Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O. wins Guam by 7 caucus votes**....NOT 7%: fraction of 1%; camp predicted 11% win.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:53 PM
Original message
O. wins Guam by 7 caucus votes**....NOT 7%: fraction of 1%; camp predicted 11% win.
O. wins Guam by 7 caucus votes**....NOT 7%: fraction of 1%; camp predicted 11% win.


What a squeakier. Congratulations O.


Onto Tuesday


http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080504/NEWS01/80504018

"When all of the ballots were finally counted -- a process that lasted through the night until well after the sun was up -- Sen. Barack Obama had the most votes from Guam Democrats in the party’s caucus held yesterday.

Obama finished with 2,264 votes to Sen. Hillary Clinton’s 2,257 votes – a 7-point difference.




Obama wins by a fraction of 1%.... but the Obama campaign expected him to win by 11%
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Obamas_projections.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. And he will win the Delegate thing 6-3 so congrats OBAMA
Another blow to the man who knows how to organize a caucus, put another way he will net 2 more from GUAM than he did from TEXAS. You only have to win by one friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. All the rodeo dancing in the world won't stop the Obama Train!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Wrong, they split 4 delegates
so they are each up two


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. There are 9 delegates up for grabs. 5 SDs, 4 PDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care
If he wonby 30% or lost by 30%. I think its silly that Guam and Puerto Rico get to way in on the nomination when they can't vote in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. I Agree
We should give commonwealths/territories the option to become states of independent nations...Anything less is imperialism...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. I think they can go independent by plebiscite but they don't pay U.S. income taxes.
They will pay U.S. income taxes if they opt for formal statehood status which is why usually prefer to maintain commonwealth/territory status. They apparently feel voting for the U.S. President is not worth paying U.S. taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. A win is a win.........ask Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. ALSO NICE TRY USING OLD "PROJECTIONS" but.......
SINCE YOU BROUGHT IT UP
HE UNDER PREDICTED LOUISIANA BY 3, NEBRASKA BY 8, VIRGIN ISLANDS BY 30(YES THIRTY), WASHINGTON BY 8, mAINE HE ACTUALLY PICKED HILLARY TO WIN BUT SHE DIDNT, AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON.
BY THE WAY HE PREDICTED HE WOULD LOSE OHIO BY 7 (IT WAS 10), TEXAS BY 4 (ON THE MONEY) PA BY 5 (IT WAS 9)
next time you go off spouting 'stats" give it some context at least. The truth is he has only missed once (when he predicted Hill to win Maine) and he has underpredicted himself many times. With all the outperforming hes done, he can borrow a few points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. 2,264 is a bigger number than 2,257
And it appears that he will also win more total delegates too. All Hillary is doing now is trading baskets with Obama, while he gets closer to 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. that magic number is elusive to obama. He will not get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Elusive, he is moving up on it
He gets 5 (possibly 6 today) plus he got three more supers Today. Remember for every 1 delegate (pledged or super) he gets she needs to get three so one a day he nets 3 she needs to 9. plus he got three supers today to zero for her. so he nets 6 today while she needed to net 18. The point her is that he is closer than you think and actually better organized. IF she won 70% of the vote from today (AND THEY JUST SPLIT The rest of the SUPERS) he would still only need 4 votes. So your thoughts about the number being elusive are rubbish. Remember for every margin under 70 she is, she needs to make it up. So that means NOW she has to win every remaining state by 72.3% and split the supers JUST To keep him within four of the NUMBER. Now if you have some math that will back up your
"number is elusive" thingy then please let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eagle_Eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary 49.9% . Obama 50.1% . It is not even up, Obama is in the lead by a WIDE margin
Obama's seven vote victory over Hillary sure shows how far ahead he is.

This is not even close.

Hillary should fold her tent and go home. She lost by such a wide margin, she should just resign her Senate seat and move to Frostbite Falls, Minnesota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. she should really
She proved again how lame her math is. She loses by seven votes, but isnt even organized in the caucus enough to prevent him from winning the SUPERS and Pledged, he will probably be a 6-3 delegate winner. Shows how damn smart he is and how organized he is and how crappy and insignificant she feels every place that votes is. If you cant get behind a guy who can win by seven votes and end up with a NET +3 of delegates, you ought to head to frostbite falls. Another state that "doesnt count" for Hillary. (at least until we get to Puerto Rico then THEY Will count I bet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Guam has only four votes. You math is off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. Damn know your facts MAN its 9 delegates today
They also ELECTED the supers today. For the other 5. Sheesh. Why even comment if you dont know what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's not how close she's is or is not winning, it is how she's getting close that
is her problem now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Damn.
I thought you said you were leaving DU. Way to disappoint. x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anticat Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
48. Wow. You just like blew my mind.
So deep, yet so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. Well since you've been tomstoned already, guess your mind is the one gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. She was? Whoa. Awwwwwkwaaaaard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Austinitis Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Guam was a pretty huge embarassment for Obama.
But his supporters shouldn't worry about him. He seems to be getting used to being embarrassed now days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. At least he doesn't lie about being under sniper fire.
Obama's worst sin was forgiving his loud-mouthed pastor and giving him a second chance when he should have kicked him to the curb. Hardly compares to the crap that Hillary is slinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. IF you call a NET 3 an embarrasment then Ill take it.
Hillary WON Texas and got less return for that. Think about that tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. Really? 31-15 over Clinton so far overall. Those are great stats if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
53. The last 2 months have been an embarrassment for Hillary Clinton.
Edited on Sat May-03-08 10:27 PM by PseudoIntellect
She has had the former president, the GOP, and the entire media on her side, and she has netted 0 delegates, even with wins in the TX, OH, and PA primaries.

A virtual tie in a territory that was destined to split 2-2 anyway isn't too bad, especially when you're getting more of the superdelegate endorsements in the place and making it even harder for the underdog to get nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. all of the threads by both Obama and Clinton sides on Guam are ridiculous
Its a fun interlude but has no significance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. But... Obama got 50% of the Catholic vote... that's a huge demographic shift!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. yes but if Cousin Bertha and her friends and the apostalic choir at the Pentacostal Catholic Union
decide to move to the Reformed Protestant Rock of Ages Assembly then the Catholic percentage will be only 42%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. you consider a NET 3 DELEGATE WIN insignificant.?
She only netted 16 from that whole six weeks work in PA, and she hands back 3 today? thats not trivial. He worked the caucuses which she ignored, thats significant as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Guam only has four votes.
The result can only be 4-0, 3-1 or 2-2. None of those are a net of three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. 9 votes, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. 4 pledged delegates welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. You forgot to add the supers for Guam. The total is 9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. the supers had nothing to do with the election today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. ACTUALLY THEY DID, the supers were voted on today as well.
Dang I cannot believe the ignorance. ANyhoo. No wonder Hillary can win texas by 4 and still lose in DELEGATES, they dont even know the totals. When hillary goes down, she is going to look back on the caucus season and realize she got her ass handed to her. Obviously her people are worried about delegate splits and what not and dont even care that supers are being voted on as well. Dang no wonder they are in the tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anticat Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Lujan, a newly elcted super has said she will vote for the winner of Guam.....
so there is a net 1 super for the winner of Guam.

Fortunately, a recount will show Hillary is the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. Some endorsed ultimately based on who won the popular vote today, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. MATH DUDE THE SUPERS ARE PICKED TODAY AS WELL
total of 9 delegates, get it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
43. Wrong
Its 8 ½-delegates. It can be 4-0, 3.5-0.5, 3-1, 2.5-1.5, 2-2. So yeah, there is a +3 result in there. But thats beside the point.

As the one you comment on is counting the supers elected today as well. And they seem to have fallen out +3 for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Pledged delegates decided today 2-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hehehehe. Who is nitpicking now?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a razor thin victory. To imagine that if a family of four had voted for her instead of him...
she would have won the state. Shades of FL 2000, only with much much smaller stakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. True, thats why every vote counts
The threshold in GUAM was something like 56+% so even had SHE won with 56% they still would have split the pledged (2 apiece) the crappy part for her was that her slate for state chair and vice chair went down and the other slate of supers picked are apt to go to OBAMA. Meaning she lost by seven but it wouldnt have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Officials say recount is imminent on missing and spoiled ballots
Officials say recount is imminent
Pacific News Center Staff Reporter 04.MAY.08
9:30 a.m. Guam – Herbie Perez, Democrat Party Nominating Committee Chairperson, says officials will look over the large amount of “spoiled” ballots in the coming days. At issue is small margin of victory for Senator Barack Obama. He beat his rival Senator Hillary Clinton by 7 votes, but well over 500 ballots were deemed invalid during the tabulation process. Perez says she will not certify the results because the Committee needs to ensure all were properly identified as “spoiled.” She says officials from the Party and representatives from both candidates will meet probably Monday or Tuesday to address that issue.

She is also looking into missing ballots. In total, over 8,100 were printed in response to reports of shortages at precinct sites. But when the final vote count was given, only a little over 4.500 ballots were used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. thanks. given that close count--not surprizing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. Huum ~ here we go again

I had a feeling when Obama was leading by such a big margin that something was going to make his win narrow.

Same old smoke and mirrors all the way over there.

Huum :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. That prediction was back in February lol
Ya think Obama has had a few attacks since then? Maybe? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. did he leave it stand as such? or is there a more recent on? Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. If he did he didnt release it BUT
Its been pretty good, especially if you look at the PLEDGED delegate total, given that vote totals are linked its surprising that his people (I doubt he actually did it) did such a good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anticat Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. Exactly. He thought no one would attack him.... just wait til the GOP gets ahold of
him.... he thought he was above it all.... yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. looks like the rest of the nation
I've never seen a trailing candidate this strong at this point in the primary contest. I wouldn't be surprised to see this number change, perhaps swinging the other way (perhaps not).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
44. on 4500 votes fcs.
1% or 11% is rather unimportant in terms of pledged delegates. And since its only once district with 4 votes, with no polling, I am betting they didn't spend much more on it than "I think we take it, but not enough for a 2,5-1,5 split. Putting it down for us with..hmm...no clue....11..More than that and it splits 1 for us. Less than that, within a 22 points of +11, is all the same...11 it is.". Bingo, Guam line filled out.

None had a clue today even. Why should they have had it 2+ months ago? We are talking 250 voters or so that could move it from +0.2 to +11 by switching sides.

All in all they ended up with the predicted number of delegates. And so far as winners - as predicted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
49. This shows how ludicrous a method the caucus is in selecting a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Funny that it only got "ridiculous" during this primary cycle, though... eom
Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
58. Caucus = cheaper than a primary, unable to be hacked, and harder for Repukes to crossover for
mischief.

Yeah, totally sucks, doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC