Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SHE NEVER READ THE INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:04 PM
Original message
SHE NEVER READ THE INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE?
BEFORE VOTING FOR WAR?

WTF is this true!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, she did talk to Cheney, and other Republican leaders before she voted. That's just as good
ya'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. link me please, I am looking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. You Mean The NIE That Said There Was No Direct Evidence Of WMD?
That one?

No, she didn't read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I dont know what it said...
Just kinda seems like the due diligence you might take before voting for a WAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Indeed. One WOULD think a law degree WOULD tell her about "due diligence."
Her's apparently didn't "take." I don't want that in a lawyer. Or a Senator. OR a President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I am a creative director...( an artist )
& I do due diligence for all my clients.

If my clients were a country.... my god.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. It Said That There Was No Direct Evidence Of WMD
Most Democrats in Congress voted against going to war, Clinton voted to attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nope
No. Nyet. Nein. No, she did not read the NIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/few-senators-read-iraq-nie-report-2007-06-19.html

She's listed under "Did not read full report/could not recall."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's what's been reported
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. She didn't need to because she is so experienced. Plus she slept at a Holiday Inn Express
the night before voting. :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. LOL
She'll be ready on DAY ONE dammit, and not a moment sooner!!

:rofl:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep. She'll make a great president.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. This shows that she makes decisions purely for political reasons

This goes hand an hand with this stupid gas tax thing. What a pandering jelly fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary Clinton Can't be Trusted on Iraq
When President Bush launched the invasion soon thereafter and spontaneous protests broke out across the country, Senator Clinton voted in favor of a Republican-sponsored resolution that "commends and supports the efforts and leadership of the President . . . in the conflict against Iraq."

During a trip to Iraq in February 2005, she insisted that the U.S. occupation was "functioning quite well," although the security situation had deteriorated so badly that the four-lane divided highway on flat open terrain connecting the airport with the capital could not be secured at the time of her arrival and a helicopter had to transport her to the Green Zone. Though 55 Iraqis and one American soldier were killed during her brief visit, she insisted -- in a manner remarkably similar to Vice President Cheney -- that the rise in suicide bombings was evidence that the insurgency was failing.

On NBC's "Meet the Press" that same month, she argued that it "would be a mistake" to immediately withdraw U.S. troops or even simply set a timetable for withdrawal, claiming that "We don't want to send a signal to insurgents, to the terrorists, that we are going to be out of here at some, you know, date certain." Less than two years ago, she declared, "I reject a rigid timetable that the terrorists can exploit." And, just last year, on an appearance on ABC's Nightline, she described how "I've taken a lot of heat from my friends who have said, ‘Please, just, you know, throw in the towel and say let's get out by a date certain. I don't think that's responsible." When Representative John Murtha made his first call for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq in November 2005, she denounced his effort, calling a withdrawal of U.S. forces "a big mistake.Senator Clinton also took credit for strengthening U.S. ties with Ahmad Chalabi, the convicted embezzler who played a major role in convincing key segments of the administration, Congress, the CIA, and the American public that Iraq still had proscribed weapons, weapons systems, and weapons labs. She has expressed pride that her husband's administration changed underlying U.S. policy toward Iraq from "containment" -- which had been quite successful in defending Iraq's neighbors and protecting its Kurdish minority -- to "regime change," which has resulted in tragic warfare, chaos, dislocation, and instability.

Prior to the 2003 invasion, Clinton insisted that Iraq still had a nuclear program, despite a detailed 1998 report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), subsequent studies that indicated that Iraq's nuclear program appeared to have been completely dismantled a full decade earlier, and a 2002 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate that made no mention of any reconstituted nuclear development effort. Similarly, even though Iraq's chemical and biological weapons programs had been dismantled years earlier, she also insisted that Iraq had rebuilt its biological and chemical weapons stockpiles. And, even though the limited shelf life of such chemical and biological agents and the strict embargo against imports of any additional banned materials that had been in place since 1990 made it physically impossible for Iraq to have reconstituted such weapons, she insisted that "It is clear ... that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

In the fall of 2002, Senator Clinton sought to discredit those questioning Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice-President Dick Cheney, and others who were making hyperbolic statements about Iraq's supposed military prowess by insisting that Iraq's possession of such weapons "are not in doubt" and was "undisputed." Similarly, Clinton insisted that Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 2005 speech at the UN was "compelling" although UN officials and arms control experts roundly denounced its false claims that Iraq had reconstituted these proscribed weapons, weapons programs, and delivery systems. In addition, although top strategic analysts correctly informed her that there were no links between Saddam Hussein's secular nationalist regime and the radical Islamist al-Qaeda, Senator Clinton insisted that Saddam "has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members."

http://www.alternet.org/audits/70416/?page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Zunes' article lays it out very well. She's a LIAR on that as well.
"She now claims that it wasn't necessary for her to have actually read the 92-page document herself because she was briefed on the contents of the report. However, since no one on her staff was authorized to read the report, it's unclear who could have actually briefed her."

Lie! She's despicable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Its a must read article ....... its the lying that gets me
which is one consistent character trait that should be apparent
to anyone that has paid attention to the Clintons and this evil regime and war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. There's lying and there's lying. While I dislike all lying ...
... I find that lying due to moral cowardice and self-aggrandizement is among the worst. That's Hillary.

She LIES in an attempt to make it easier on herself ... to avoid standing up for core principles. I really doubt she has any.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pompano Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. I know....
but wouldn't you think a Resolution for War, where human beings die and others are gravely wounded, that it is not too much to ask of a United States Senator, to perhaps pencil in a little time to read something this important. This isn't like a public works project funding bill for 2026. It's a War. Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable.

Despicable, you got that right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. It's funny really
She was misled by faulty intelligence which she never bothered to read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary Clinton Can't be Trusted. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. The 90 page NIE report?
No, she did not read it before voting "yes" on the IWR..she, of course, voted yes on the kyl lieberman bill, too, since she'd be willing to get herself into trouble by Rattlin' more Sabers with her pronouncement that she would Obliterate Iran.. Who even talks like that? Neocons??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
18.  Was She Too Tired Or Was She Still Dodging Sniper Fire?
Has she ever given a reason for failing to do her job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. OMG
She didn ’t read the National Intelligence Estimate,

Jay Rockefeller read it,



but she didn’t read it.

I don’t know what all that experience got her because in my experience if you have a National Intelligence Estimate and the

Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee


says,

You should read this, this is why I’m voting against the war



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Obama really needs to take this and run with it. This is embarrassing for Hillary and
tragic for our nation. She is a disgrace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Wasn't Rockerfeller, was Sen. Bob Graham of Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Actually....Rockefeller Voted Yes
Rockefeller voted to authorize IWR - Obama got this one wrong in a speech slamming Hillary for her vote. Rockefeller now states he regrets voting yes.
http://blackpoliticalthought.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-praises-jay-rockefellers.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
53. Obama was right
While he mentioned Jay Rockefeller (who voted yes, but at least he read the NIE), he was referring to Bob Graham, who was the chairman of the Intelligence Committee at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. She didn't need to read it. She trusted Bush would do the right thing.
She claims she talked to people in the WH she trusted and they assured her Bush wouldn't go to war. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That would make her a LIAR and a FOOL.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Correct.
The Code Pink video from 2003 is infuriating to watch as she oh-so-confidently explains why Saddam should be removed from power and talks of trust in her fellow hawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. She looked into bush's eyes and read his soul.
Bloody bunch of incompetent fucktards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Reading is for losers. Photo ops after the Pretzeldent gives you the "scoop" is where its at
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
32. She was briefed by the people who wrote it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. sez who?
her?

thats like watching the video instead of reading the book, think maybe they changed the ending?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Unfortunately, those people didn't brief her on what was actually in the report.
Nice try there, but no.

It was her responsibility to know what was in the report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. well I am sickened. eom
this stabs directly into the heart of the experience argument imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
38. Obama didn't read it either before forming his opinion.
At least she had a high-level briefing on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. The UN at that point had better information, entirely public
Nobody needed the NIE then - the stink of what was going on was everywhere if one had eyes and ears open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
50. Because anyone with their eyes and ears open knew what was going on
The Bush administration is filled with people that has been advocating a war against Iraq since the mid 90's. The evidence for WMDs was hilariously weak. Must have been a professional low point for General Powell to do that show and dance for the UN.

If you thought the US administration made their case, you were not keeping yourself sufficiently informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
51. Oh please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
39. That is correct. But only 6 Senators did read it, so she wasn't alone in negligence.
Sen. Bob Graham pleaded with his fellow Senators to read the full, 92-page classified NIE, which differed considerably from the filtered unclassified version, but so many failed to do so -- including both the Senators on the Democratic ticket last time around, both of whom also voted for the war.

Personally, my belief is that if we say we want to hold accountable those who led us into this disastrous war, then we cannot only go after Republicans. Some blame lies at the feet of our Democratic leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
41. What she read was the polling
Where most Americans thought that Iraq attacked us with Al Quaeda and did the politcally expedient thing and voted for the war thinking it would be a success. She thought this would make her look tough for her eventual Presidential run. Kind of gratifying that doing the wrong thing was rewarded in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. No, she did not. She got "briefed" about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
43. It's OK
She was lying when she said she hadn't read it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
44. She should have read my book.
I mailed her a copy, along with her 99 playmates.

Tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. 23 of those "playmates" did just fine without yr book, Will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. 28 short
*sigh*

I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
46. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
47. Wow. Did your hibernation period just end?
Or is this a faux OMG moment to post something that has been known and talked about over and over and over and...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. Sorry
Canadian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #47
61. Sorry
Canadian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
49. She don't need no stinking expert opinions - just look at the Clinton/McCain gas tax holiday.
Like Bush, Hillary thinks with her gut, not her brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
54. I stand corrected.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 07:43 AM by cornermouse
Bush either withheld vital information on several votes or only delivered several volumes of information about an hour before the vote. It's easy to remember because I was so angry about it at the time. That said, it is still more accurate to lay the blame at Bush's feet on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
55. Shameful and sad, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
56. K&R for the dead and maimed
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
57. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
58. She probably just figured we would obliterate them and all of this would be
cleared up by now for her run for president. Hey whats a few hundred thousand dead Iraqis men, women, and children.... It's not like their rich people or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
59. Common knowledge, yep... she admitted it long ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
62. No. But, she did read the all-important polls.
And, voting for the war seemed like the "smart" political thing to do.

Either that, or she's just plain stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
63. She was too busy
trying to increase her testicular fortitude to be bothered with such nonsense. We don't need no stinking intelligence estimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC