Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What more is there to say about Wright! Enough already.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:44 AM
Original message
What more is there to say about Wright! Enough already.
This has been hashed over ad absurdium for weeks. There is nothing left for Obama or the media to say. But it is still topic one for Russert. The MSM is a dog with a bone they won't let go of. There is nothing left in this story, and yet they keep it as the ONLY issue in the campaign.
Give it up already, it's becoming pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's an America Hater!
booga booga booga
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama's standard reply when asked should, from now on, be...
..."I covered that on Meet the Press". period...question aswered...move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The media tells you when had enough. Got that Mr.?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. EXACTLY. It's over when Tim Russert says it's over!
Our Liberal Media Is So Awesome. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't even start threads on it. And neither should you. It just keeps it out there longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. This isn't about Wright.
It's about the failure of the Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes, but everytime you post that name, it's equivalent to posting that name on the front page at CNN
That's the whole theory behind advertising.

Keep the brand in the public eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Wow, my post
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:28 AM by edhopper
on a Dem site is as widely read as CNN. Argument ad absurbium.
The more the MSM dwells on Wright, the more they need to be denounced. It should be apparent that staying silent is not making this farce go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. But when you dwell on what's his name, it's different? I'm not trying to chastise you about this,
just saying that every time you put his name out there, his name is put out there one more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You are now certifiably
famous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. But the cable news networks had their hour-long specials on Wright all ready to go!
Why waste them, even though Obama has firmly denounced his comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, please! They're just getting WARMED UP. They lured him into using Wright as proof he wasn't
Muslim, and then says, "Oh, I didn't REALLY know him that well...nevermind my naming my book after one of his sermons"

fer chrissakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. That poor dead horse
is getting flogged into mincemeat.

Timmy, we don't care. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. This could easily go away
if Obama sat down and really explained why he chose what people think is
a separatist theology (BLT) when the foundation of his whole campaign
is that he is the great unifier.

Wright is just a symptom of the issue. The real issue is a deeper contradiction
that Obama must address head on. That's the only way this is going away.

This isn't rocket science, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Which he has done
at least a dozen times by my count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. He hasn't answered the obvious question
Edited on Sun May-04-08 03:20 PM by TheDudeAbides
Black Liberation Theology focuses on blacks (the oppressed victims) and
white (the evil oppressors). Please do not bother disputing this until
you've read James Cone's book on BLT; he is the creator of the theology
back in the 1960s. I think most experts agree that it is a separatist theology.

So, this choice by Obama is a direct contraction to the Obama "brand"
of the great unifier of people of all races, genders, etc.

We need him to make voters feel more comfortable with this contradiction
between Obama (the man) and Obama (the person).

There's nothing racist about this; people are stuck because it simply doesn't
make any sense. It makes people think that his "brand"...his presentation...
does not represent the real person. Furthermore, this choice also
calls into question Obama's judgment. Why did he not choose a theology that
focused on unity rather than black/white differences?

How does teaching children to view the world in this way prepare them
for our integrated society?

When Obama answers these questions, people might move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. What about Hillary's participation in an extreme rightwing prayer group?
Which is she ... a rightwinger or a democrat/progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Why are we changing the subject when I asked an important question?
can we come to a conclusion here first?
or is that how we deal with difficult questions here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Oh, I see.
These questions only apply to Obama. Hillary is exempt. Gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. They've emptied their guns and now have nothing left
All their bullets are gone. They could have saved some for later, but now have no choice but to go limp on the subject. I hope it was good for them because it's over now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I only wish that were true
but I fear they will not let go of this. Showing an angry black man shouting to a crowd is just too irresistible for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because it's all they have.
It is beyond clear they want him to lose and they have nothing else on him. I think they don't realize it yet, but in the long run this is hurting them more than it is Obama, because I have started turning the channel when they mention his name, and I cannot possibly be the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Have you checked out the NEW pastor?
(as you brought the topic of pastors up)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. its racist race-baiting so the hillary camp will continue because they love that.
proves what they are all about. and DU admin sanctions the race baiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDudeAbides Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Isn't it Obama supporter who keep posting these threads? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Hillary was asked about the Wright controversy this morning during
the town hall meeting on This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Her advice: "Move on".

STEPHANOPOULOS: And we are back with Senator Hillary Clinton. I want to get right to another voter question. Michelle Skinner , are you there? Michelle attends Butler University. She's a Republican, who's voting in the Democratic primary and is supporting Barack Obama.

VOTER: That's right.

Sen. Clinton, my question is do you think that the discourse that's going on, the controversy with Reverend Wright, do you think this is relevant to Obama and his policy? Do you think this has accomplished anything? Or should we just -- should we drop it, should we move on?

CLINTON: Well, we should definitely move on. And we should move on because there's so many important issues facing our country that we have to attend to.

And she moved on. So should we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Good for her.
I'm glad she learned from her mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Good response
Obama needs to swear off pastors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. It won't be enough until Obama
has milked it for all its worth...millions of free publicity and an opportunity to get his ideas out to the public...can't blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. He needs to swear off his addiction to pastors for a start.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Gosh, I don't know...maybe if they just played those clips again I could decide...
whether I've had enough that is...his fashion sense really needs an upgrade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC