Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you still feel the same way about Hillary's alleged fake crying as you used to?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:35 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you still feel the same way about Hillary's alleged fake crying as you used to?
In light of all the things that have happened since then, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. The ONLY fraud on the Democratic side is BO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, his story about ducking sniper fire is fake and Hillary's is true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. how so, exactly?
If you're going to state something like that, I would hope you can back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Just for openers..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. LOL. Nice objective "news" source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Welcome to the failboat. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Intellectually dishonest.
1) This took me to a vehemently anti-Obama site which spoke MOSTLY about his "cult of personality" and "Obamania". There is NO DOUBT in my mind that the site you pointed to is FAR LESS than objective. Citing biased links is intellectually dishonest.

2) Many of the sources cited WIHTIN the blog I am unfamiliar with or know to be less than reputable, i.e. "BostonNow" - never heard of this, Taylor Marsh - Pro Hillary shill, etc. Citing articles written by complete unknowns or Hillary shills is not assisting your point and is intellectually dishonest.

3) Re: "Democrat for a Day". It's surprising that your side would bring any of this up considering the outrageous effort of LIMBAUGH (a well known figure) to get his idiot supporters to go out and vote Hillary. Operation Chaos netted MANY MANY Republicans turning out to the polls for Hillary. The goal to get anyone - Republicans, Independants, Undecideds, Non-committeds, etc is called smart campaigning and reaching out to ALL americans and moving beyond party politics. Using an ENEMY of the democratic party and progressive issues to get thugs to come to the polls is quite different. Pointing out the splinter in Obama's eye while failing to discuss the BEAM in Hillary's eye is intellectually dishonest.

4) The blog makes ridiculous connections and assumptions that just because Axelrod has worked for a few male candidates that it is his specific agenda to make sure women DON'T get elected. That is slanderous and intellectually dishonest.

I could go on and on, but what is the point?...

Would you care to cite any REPUTABLE sources for your claim instead of a loony blog? It would be appreciated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Don't send us elsewhere, give us one credible FACT, not opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Double Toilet flush for you ... buh bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is she crying again?
She's obviously going to pull some bullshit today to screw with the elections. What will she pull out of her bag of Rovian tricks this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Just a little while ago, I thought of another Rovian trick she might have used.
What if the Kantor "these people are shit" thing was her own Rovian trick? It sure pushed the racist robocall scandal off the radar of the mainstream news. I think it's within the realm of possibility because the right-wingers gave the fake document about Bush* in the National Guard and had the debunking at the ready hours later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. that's what I thought
that in light of the robo-calls, wouldn't it be a clever distraction to pull one of these fakesters from the rovian convenience stores, and then be able to claim a "SHAME ON YOU" moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. The guy who posted the thing is a known entity, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. She's going to have Reagan's body exhumed and campaign with it
throughout Indiana....in the back of a pick-up....doing shots of whiskey...that ought to help her with the 'Reagan Democrats' x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Win one for the Sipper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Ha ha Beautiful!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. On the morning shows today she was showing her "manic" side. I'm concerned the fix is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't care whether it was fake or not. It was a bogus issue. Distraction. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Distraction? The crying, yes the sniper fire, yes; the lies about the sniper fire; NO, NO, NO.....
I do NOT want another president who thinks lying to the American people is business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. I agree. I was only talking about the crying. The sniper fire claim was obviously an outright
lie by Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think it was fake and I'd find it callous to think so, however I don't find it relevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. It's not the crime, but the cover-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Present
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. I never thought it was fake, and that's still my take on it.
But I think the moment it occurred she seized the opportunity to give the impassioned "I just care about this country SO MUCH" line.

I know she cares, I honestly believe that, and I think the tearing up (it was hardly crying) was a result of all the pressure, frustration and exhaustion of running this balls-to-the-walls campaign.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. I never thought it was fake
It seemed like a genuine moment. I'm not a big fan of Hillary but I don't think this was staged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. Nothing was faked - It's Clinton Derangement Syndrome
They simply have to say and make the foulest distortions where a Clinton is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. Fake - That woman poops plastic novelty turds n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DMorgan Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. In January, I didn't agree with Hillary but thought she shed a real tear or two.
By March, any indication that Hillary is EVER honest with the American voters was no longer possible.

She lied, she cried. She lied when she cried, let's move on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC