Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary is winning older establishment Democrats who happen to be white.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:45 PM
Original message
Hillary is winning older establishment Democrats who happen to be white.
I do not believe racial motivations are responsible for Hillary's slight lead in this demographic. These "white working class" voters are older, safer, establishment leaning, and numerous in this country's rust belt states. They have fond memories of Bill Clinton's two previous presidential terms. They lean Clinton because they know them and truly believe them to be the better candidate (there's nothing wrong with that). Obama is newer, fresher, and to those not willing or capable of researching it a perceived "roll of the dice".

Obama has to work hard for these voters, no doubt about it, but it's not a racial thing (evident with his mountain west showing) -- even though it's unfortunately spun that way by many. If we are to continue on, Obama needs to court these voters and we need to immediately drop this impression that "white voters" will not back Obama. Once we get on to the GE, with a little work, and coalescing of all party factions, we'll quickly start to see the fruits of a unified party (read: smashing McCain and the Republicans).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. It leads me into one thing about Obama that is a problem
With all his talk of a "purple" America, I do not see that his ties to the Democratic party per se are that strong or deep. I think he runs as a Democratic because it's his gateway and, to be fair, because he's clearly NOT a Republican.

But I've never heard of him campaigning for other Democrats (as Hillary has for years, she's been in Washington state many times raising money for candidates) and I've never heard of him working on anyone else's election. My sole exposure to him in connection with any party affair was the 2004 convention.

At our caucus, the old time Dems, party regulars, were marginalized and not allowed to speak. And these were women in their 60s and 70s who probably are the ones who faithfully attended meetings month after month in the lean years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Obama
Edited on Thu May-08-08 01:21 PM by Jake3463
Worked his ass off for other democrats in 2004 and 2006. He had an uncontested primary in 2004 and was a rockstar on the trail for Kerry.

In 2006 he worked very hard for downticket races.

He also helped a democrat take Hasterd's seat in a special election this year.


He wasn't a national figure before that so how could he campaign for people when no one knew him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I understand.
Edited on Thu May-08-08 01:24 PM by cottonseed
Obama's message is definitely resonating with his core constituencies, the support there hasn't budged, and it is aggressive (which I think has its advantages). I do believe that he'll do a decent job of reaching out if/when the nomination is secured.

I think his relative newness kept him from making too much of a significant impact in working for other's campaigns nationally early on. His organization is growing however, and he'll definitely be able to throw that weight down ticket from here on out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. 20% of this country is still against interracial marriage.
That number shoots up among white people over 65.

As a white person over 65 myself, I've no doubts that many of these people are racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Some of that may go back to Biblical thinking
There is something in the Old Testament about no inter-racial marriages and I think some older Christians take this literally. I always thought it had more to do with Jewish history and the inter-marriage between tribes. Some have taken that literally I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC