Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards: Clinton didn't choose words well on race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:34 PM
Original message
Edwards: Clinton didn't choose words well on race
Edwards: Clinton didn't choose words well on race


Posted on Sun, May. 11, 2008 02:02 PM

The Associated Press

Former Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards said Sunday that Hillary Rodham Clinton probably didn't choose her words carefully when she suggested Barack Obama was losing the white vote.

Edwards also hedged on whether he might still endorse one of his former rivals, but said he thinks Obama will be the nominee. He cautioned that in Clinton's continued push for the nomination, she "has to be really careful" not to damage the Democratic Party's prospects in November.

"I know how hard it is to get up and go out there every day, speak to the media, speak to crowds, when people are urging you to get out of the race. I mean, it's a very hard place to be in. But she's shown a lot of strength about that," said Edwards, a former North Carolina senator who dropped out of the race in January.

"But I think the one thing that she has to be careful about ... going forward, is that, if she makes the case for herself, which she's completely entitled to do, she has to be really careful that she's not damaging our prospects, the Democratic Party, and our cause, for the fall," he said in a taped interview broadcast on CBS' "Face the Nation."

more...

http://www.kansascity.com/445/story/615187.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it wasn't an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary Clinton is one of the most calculating women who ever drew breath
she knew EXACTLY what she was saying. And she keeps repeating it. So do her surrogates. Edwards is obviously being generous here because he's trying to score his own little side deal. There is no mistake that she said what she meant and meant what she said or she'd end all discussions of "white, hard-working BS" immediately by both herself and her band of toadies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She's a trained, skillful lawyer and an expert at parsing
I agree with you that she knew exactly what she was saying. Bill Clinton too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. "he's not muslim, as far as I know" right
Edited on Sun May-11-08 02:43 PM by rosebud57
Can you imagine if Obama, said, "she's not a lesbian, as far as I know"

If you haven't seen the Hillary lesbian tabloid covers you haven't been to the grocery store
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And can you imagine if Obama had said
"she's not a lesbian."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Obama got scolded all over the place for
saying "she likeable enough". I'm thinking he was determined not to come anywhere close to that again.

It doesn't matter..people can read between the lines. We all know what hilary's done and how much more she's capable of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Right wing talking point: "most calculating women who ever drew breath"
Created to scare the misogynists in America when they re-defined her and then attacked her for their re-definition.

Made up out of whole cloth...and you, based on absolutely know evidence (how would you know how "calculating" she is?) you continue to repeat that right-wing talking point as if fact. And then attack her for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. ok - she's the most calculating "politician" running as the women presidential candidate
Hillary is first to point out how historic it would be to have the
first woman president elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. she was the first person to point that out? Really? When, how?
I know I thought it. I did not realize she was the FIRST PERSON TO POINT THAT OUT. How horrific of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. All it takes to know she's calculating is eyes and ears.
How else do you explain the parsing of her support for the war, saying it was a bad idea to go to war but refusing to acknowledge the vote was a mistake? That's hardly the only case: her opposition to banning the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas, her opposition to a ban on landmines, her yes-no-maybe position on torture, her jumping on Kerry for his joke in 2006 the same way the Republicans deliberately misread it... If it gets her one millimeter closer to the supposed political middle, she'll jump on it.

Oh, wait, I'm sorry. You didn't actually want to acknowledge facts, you just wanted to brand any non-supporters as sexists. My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Your version of "facts" of course is twisted, distorted, and very very
biased. But, don't let a good sexist hate-fest get in the way of facts. You have chosen to hate her and to believe the right-wing talking points re-defining and re-characterizing her.

There were many many democrats who supported IWR--Edwards was never called "calculating" Kerry was never called calculating.

She admitted IWR vote was a mistake and that is not enough for you. "Parse?" You ignore every thing Obama has ever said, or you would call him calculating too.

Opposition to baning cluster bombs: well, I know that she has worked her whole life for children, so when you characterize her a someone who likes clusterbombs, I need to know more about that vote. And, I trust her judgement.

Torture: yes / no / maybe? YOu are now making crap up. She has been firmly against torture constantly.

And, your condesnding smart ass attitude...shove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Sexist
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. John Edwards retaining grace and dignity even if his non endorsement
maddens me. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. She knows exactly what she is doing
She has been at this for too long not to.

Senator Edwards just blew the dog whistle. Hopefully, her surrogates hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. Of course she knows what she is doing. I'm hoping Obama
knows what he is doing. Sincerely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. It didn't matter what words she chose
the subject matter is not allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. subject matter: demographics is suddenly not allowed?
Why? Obama has been talking about it for awhile now. Remember the "bitter" comment? That was all about demographics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Well you see in 1964 when Johnson signed the Civil Rights act & the Dixiecrats left
for the GOP. Since that time catering and capitulating to whites who for whatever reason are manipulated by racially divisive campaign rhetoric has not been a democratic party strategy. I believe it would be a mistake to start now in this post Macaca time. Especially since those would be the whites that vote for the GOP. Has been for many election cycles.

Long story short, if you are a racist white you don't belong in our party. And since younger voters are less racist, that is a good long term vision for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Yeah. I remember Clintonistas raking Obama over the coals for the "bitter" thing.
So what comes around, goes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I meant it is forbidden for the white candidate to talk about it
"She's playing the race card", is the inevitable reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. He probably didn't appreciate Clinton characterizing of southern whites
Edited on Sun May-11-08 02:41 PM by anonymous171
I spoken to a lot people from the South. They say that they have been fighting those kinds of stereotypes for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. I know...Not only is she dissing Blacks
but she's dissing Southern Whites. hilary can't win for race baiting. Not your last century Jesse Helms races, hilary. Wake The Fuck UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. he's only speaking up now?
too little too late


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Love the way The Carolinian phrases things.
I hope there are folks in the Clinton camp with ears to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I do too
I think he was too kind. Lawyers are wordsmiths as are Obama, Clinton and Edwards.

Words are their craft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yes. Agree. Hi there and happy Sunday afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. The meme that she has every right
to run seems to be a reaction, (from MANY, MANY people)IMO, that people have tried every which way but loose to get her to please suspend the campaign.... It is getting very bizzare at this point.

People are talking and people are hearing, but the Clinton campaign is not listening.

HAving a right to run is one thing, but damaging the party's ability to win in the GE is another. I think Hillary Clinton and her campaign are actually showing themselves to be very selfish at this point.

Flame me as you will... but this is how I feel. If you know a republican who you can talk to about something like this, ask them how they see it from the outside looking in. You might see what I am saying.

MY father is a straight republican voter... always will be. HE WAS going to vote for John Edwards --- voting a (d) for the forst time in his life.

But now, he went back to his camp, and he is just watching the lunacy of it all. Sad.

She doesn't have EVERY right to do whateer she wants idf she is a member of a party.

She COULD have done whatever she wanted to if she were an independent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. I wouldn't care one way or another how long she ran--
--if only she would quit using the goddam REPUKE FRAMING!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just to honest if seems like he was a lot tougher on hillary
when he was in the race vs. when he came out of it, but maybe he's trying to transition into a more neurtal role to help broker a peace at the end, although for reason I doubt hillary will be as warm to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't think anything she says is an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. President Clinton as well has been fanning the flames of division with his words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. she chose them well. she said exactly what she intended to say.
she knew exactly who she was speaking to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Massively generous of Mr. Edwards
And a clear warning shot that she needs to wise up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Agree on both counts.
:thumbsup: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorewhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. hillary's words about whites will wound obama deeply and help mccain
when you tell the white vote that barack obama is NOT your guy, where else will they go? only two people in the race, and one of them is a republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. You give hilary too much credit..she's
rendered herself invalid. hilary's words hurt hilary..who cares what she says anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. That's one way to put it..
Edwards: "Clinton didn't choose words well on race"

John's a diplomat as well as Obama and that's good. The only one who doesn't give a shit is hilary.



Rec'd~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. She knew what she was saying. It was no more a "mistake" than her vote for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC