How Clinton Lost the Lead in Superdelegates (NYTimes Graph)

[nomorewhopper]

hillary has picked up 13 superdelegates since march 4. seems that nearly all of her SD support came during the "inevitability" phase of her early campaign

[Yael]

1. And she lost 3 since May 7th

The "inevitabily" meme was in doubt on Feb 5th and sealed shut with Wisconsin.

[Scurrilous]

2. K & R

:thumbsup:

[nomorewhopper]

9. kicking

[rainbow4321]

3. Ahem...they need to correct the "won TX primary" part

When all was said and done, he got 99 delegates to her 96 and he kicked her ass in the caucus part of our primary. Are they just going to report "wins" using her 3 day faux victory lap that she and her media lapdogs did that week and NOT USE OUR FULL PRIMARY RESULTS???


Come, NYT, report accurately and correct your graph!!

[nomorewhopper]

5. actually it does say "TX Primary" so i thin kthat's fine

[rainbow4321]

7. Not really..

They are disregarding half the TX votes. They are misusing the word primary.

Our primary was a 2 step so they need to include all of the results.
Would you take any other state's "primary results" and only count 1/2 the votes cast?

Bottom line, he got 99, she got 96. Delegates are what count no matter how long HRC holds her breath to get her way.

[Kittycat]

4. I love graphs & charts

They're just something so true about them *beaming*

[nomorewhopper]

6. the nytimes has good ones

:)

[nomorewhopper]

8. momentum

[L0oniX]

10. Kickey

[nomorewhopper]

11. whats the current tally of Supers?

barack got a lot of them today

[Cha]

12. Read it and weep, mark penn, bil clinton,

terry mcauliff..while you guys were ridin' on the inevitability campaign..Obama broke through to the other side.