Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Camp: Media ‘in the tank’ for Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:26 AM
Original message
Clinton Camp: Media ‘in the tank’ for Obama
Edited on Tue May-13-08 12:00 PM by sabra

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/mcauliffe-says-media-in-the-tank-for-obama-2008-05-13.html

Terry McAuliffe, campaign chairman for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), said Tuesday that the former first lady is hamstrung by a biased media.

“Clearly it has been a biased media, no question about it,” McAuliffe said on Fox News. When asked how much of the mainstream media is “in the tank” for Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), who leads Clinton in the race for the Democratic nomination, McAuliffe estimated that about 90 percent of the media favor Obama.

“It is what it is. We’re not complaining,” he stated. “We have to deal with the hand we’re dealt with.”

McAuliffe added that “every independent study has said that this is the most biased coverage they’ve ever seen in a presidential campaign.”

He also praised Fox News, which is often viewed as a conservative media outlet, as “one of the most responsible in this presidential campaign.”



edit: Video available here > http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x131533
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes, and like their leaders, the shillbots will follow, fox is now their favorite channel...
Edited on Tue May-13-08 11:40 AM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're so in favor of Obama that they saturated the airwaves with Wright and Bittergate
Sorry, Terry, but I'm not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. We NEED the media focusing on Obama and McCain not dragging out her loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cause Bitter Pastorbation has been so positive thus far.....
The media tried to take Obama out. They just weren't successful.

Hillary, et al knows this very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. haven't even started
They haven't even started on him. You really think it's going to be a cakewalk, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Bitter much?
Even Gingrich warned the Pubs that pastorgate is not going to do for them.
For sure they will throw the regular rotten garbage Obama's way. It just is not
going to stick like it did to Kerry and Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. pastorgate
I agree; pastorgate was a red herring, and certainly lost any momentum once we got to know Rev Wright, even if you don't agree with his politics. The one nice thing about pastorgate, however was that the media FINALLY gave some air time who explained events in a way that was anything but the official version.

Bitter? No, just disappointed my candidate didn't win. But it's kind of like a football game; your team can't always win. I guess if I had nothing else going on in my life, I might be bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. I completely agree that the media did attempt to take Obama out.
Having failed they are now grudgingly acknowledging his amazing victory. At least the print media is.
It would seem the cable news is not ready to let the HRC campaign go. In many cases they are still
pounding the war drums for Clinton. But it will all be over in a couple of weeks and then they
will be on the drums for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like complaining to me
And I don't think it's even true anymore. Maybe early on in the process, and for the past week, the media has been more favorable to Obama. But they were pretty tough on him for the 2 months in between Ohio and May 6, and especially in the week before May 6. I don't think the Clinton camp can make the argument that he has coasted to the nomination without scrutiny anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't see it....
...when Hillary is doing well they say she is, when Obama is doing well they say he is, when they are doing lousy they say that too.

McCain is the one who gets the media pass- they're not even paying attention to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Terry is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. 90% of the media? Praising Faux News? The smell of desperation.
God, I had hoped they would go out with class.

Or at least all their marbles intact. This is indeed delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. Delusional was the word that came to my mind, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Reality: Votes "In the tank" for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. But we can't trust the Democratic electorate: they're biased for Obama!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wahhhh
Yeah that two full weeks of Pastorgate was so Obama friendly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds just like Bushco complaining there is no "good news" coming from Iraq
The coverage is going to be "biased" toward the winner unless the media starts making up stuff and forgets how to add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'd say the candidate who runs the positive campaign will get
nicer comments than the candidate who runs the negative campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. ROFLMAO!!! Yeah that must be it, if they can't distort reality to see things the bizzarro hillary
way, they must be "biased". Man talk about drinking the koolaide.:rofl:


Getting to know this king of fools mcauliffe, I can see why the party did so poorly under his leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Poor Hillary! I guess Saturday Night Live is dead to her now.
I sure she thinks George Stephanopoulus is Fair & Balanced, though. Uh-huh. Riiiight (Or is that "wright"?)

She's SUCH a victim! A contemporary Lazarus! :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. “We have to deal with the hand we’re dealt with.”
I hope that's a misquote. That extra "with" is really irksome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Well, after all, we have to go to war with the army we have with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. Hillary's been dealt a Queen high. Time to fold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. one excuse after another with these clowns.
Hillary had every advantage. She lost. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. The last time they made this argument, they used SNL as a counter....
...saying that "Look at SNL! Even THEY can see that the media is in the tank for Obama!"


I don't think they'll use that argument now.


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Funny how the DLC & bluedogs want to take on media bias all of a sudden.
Where were they on the issue of media bias during the Iraq war or during the last 4 elections?

Where was the support & cries of "media bias" from the DLCers during John Conyer's basement media hearings?

Another example of "the fighter" only fighting when it is her skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hmm, so all the media is biased except for the "responsible," 'fair and balanced' Faux News?
Well, McAuliffe certainly seems to be defining himself with his assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. Right. Fox, MSNBC, CNN, are all part of a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy!!
Edited on Tue May-13-08 11:44 AM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Against the poor, hapless, Clintons.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
22. The pro-Obama bias has been noted by FAIR, CMPA & Pew Research
FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), on Obama mania in the media already by early last year:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3094




A St. Petersburg Times article about the pro-Obama, anti-Clinton bias as documented by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, and the Pew Research Center:

http://www.sptimes.com/2008/03/09/Opinion/Media_tainted_by_anti.shtml



This isn't something the Clintons made up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. That was "early last year"- Before weeks & weeks of Pastorgate, "elitism", Weathermen, etc.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The CMPA and Pew Research findings were this spring. FAIR's
assessment of the pro-Obama bias among pundits was early last year. The bias has been obvious all along.

I've heard Obama backers say the media showed bias in favor of Clinton simply for referring to her as the obvious front-runner at a time when she was, and it was merely a statement of fact, about poll results. But those statements about her popularity among voters were very often followed by criticism of her.

The fact there was coverage of what Reverend Wright said -- in part because of Wright himself fanning the flames -- does NOT outweigh months and months of pro-Obama, anti-Clinton coverage.

And you know, I don't for one second believe that if the delegate stats were reversed and Clinton were slightly ahead, the media would be urging Obama to get out of the race. They'd be praising him for staying in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Thet must have blocked Pastorgate from their TVs & newspapers then...
Edited on Tue May-13-08 12:28 PM by Dr Fate
Because besides the Bosnia thing (which blew over weeks ago)- I've not seen the media single out Clinton for a "scandal" and then proceed to w/ 24/7 coverage for weeks at a time.

Frankly, I dont think either DEM candidate is getting much positive coverage- all that goes to McCain...

Hillary's coverage is a moot point anyway-and Speaking of McCain- I'm ready to start fighting him whenever you are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. More whining from the Clinton camp? Bill told Obama to toughen up &
quit whining, when Obama never even said anything. Hillary told him if he can't stand the heat..blah blah blah. I am so sick of the doublespeak coming from the Clinton camp. They were so confident that bittergate and pastorgate would end Obama's campaign, and when that didn't happen, they started to blame the media & everyone else for not taking him out.

The media sure got over snipergate quickly. It's almost as if it never happened. Obama has been made to denounce and disavow people who were creating mischief before he was even a gleam in his father's eye. Hillary has not been made to do that. And she still hasn't firmly denounced Mark Penn's activities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Hillary has made a career out of double speak. Time to exit - stage right of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. Cry me a river...
:nopity:

The media has been keeping the USS Hill afloat since Super Tuesday, Terr. :eyes: Any other candidate would have been laughed out of the race a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. The media is in the tank for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. That is correct. The media, of course, being a wholly-owned subsidiary...
of the MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. hmmmmm, I guess I was distracted by the ABC debate and the Rev. Wright-a-thon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. Correction: Media 'in the tank' with the winner.
GTFO already Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. She didn't mind when everybody was bashing Obama with Wright
That is one poor campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. The media is all for infotainment. If there's controversey they will EXPLOIT IT. No one safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC