Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN Exit Polls: WV 65.12 - 31.9

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:32 PM
Original message
CNN Exit Polls: WV 65.12 - 31.9
Delegate breakdown should be close to 19-9 for Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. is 34 43?....
oh, it was 43 on 5.08.08....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. if it's 65-31
I'd be more than content with that actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. actually 31.9 is pretty good ... considering n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I called it a 63% yesterday I wonder if it will change
later on tonight? I hadn't seen any numbers up yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Bill Clinton said it would be 80-20. Wrong again, Bill. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. I think it will, that Edwards will get 4-5%, so 63 for Clinton looks right to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whoopdee freaking dooo... A whopping 10 delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm willing to congratulate Clinton on her decisive win.
It doesn't change the delegate race much but I'm sure it feels good for her and her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Me too, but I dread to see how McAuliff is going to spin this....
McAuliff reminds me of Karen Hughes during the 2000 GE. No matter WHAT Bush did, she would crow out "He hit a HOME RUN!!"

At one point, after Bush Jr had appeared at a debate or something, she went out to the attached press pool and told them that according to the media in that state, Bush had hit "a home run." The problem was this: the event hadn't been seen by the media in that state yet because of a time difference.

Whenever McAuliff starts his Spin-O-Rama, all I can think of is Karen Hughes pathetically crowing out "He hit a HOME RUN!" every time Bush did anything, including taking a dump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Here's the thing. No media pundit wants to look like an idiot...
So while they may entertain the notion of a Clinton comeback, their hearts won't be into it. It makes them look foolish. Terry M can't spin a new narrative out of this one. It's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Hasn't McAuliff defiled the position of DNC chair?....
I was thinking today that, as much as Bill has defiled his own legacy, he has also defiled the standing of all past presidents to some degree.

Same with McAuliff. He's not just defiling hs own legacy, he's defiling to some extent all past DNC chairs' legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Another 16 states and she will erase Obama's lead
Oh wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. 16 West Virginia's?
There is but one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. For now, Obama would win 39% of the male vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. IF the exit poll math is accurate and IF the delegate breakdown accurate....
Obama nets +18 delegates for the week since NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. isnt that whats been expected? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Actually, Obama only lost Catholic voters by 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good for Hillary. I hope this at least puts some coin back in her coffers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Jeepers, she got a NET GAIN OF 10 DELEGATES!
Big f***ing deal ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yep MSNBC is live until 2am for 10 delegates
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. 19-9 is what I am coming up with as well
4-2 in each district (3)
5-2 in Pledged Addons
2-1 in PLEO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes
The downside would be if one district had Obama below 25% with the others bringing his average to 32%. In that case it would be 20-8 but that is fairly unlikely. It is even more unlikely that Obama could have taken a district over 42.3% to take another district and even if he did there would almost certainly be a district below 25% balancing it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's a ten delegate pickup
She needed this right after Super Tuesday instead of losing 12 in a row.

End of the day, this ends up being a +18 delegate week for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Compare it to these states
The races, so far, in terms of margins. Obama won them all except the two in italics and now it sounds like Clinton can add WV.

1. Virgin Islands (84.4%)

2. Idaho (64.4%)

3. Hawaii (52.6%)

4. District of Columbia (52.0%)

5. Alaska (50.6%)

6. Kansas (48.4%)

7. Washington (36.8%)

8. Georgia (36.2%)

9. Nebraska (35.4%)

10. Colorado (34.6%)

11. Minnesota (34.6%)

12. Dems Abroad (34.0%)

13. Illinois (32.8%)

14. South Carolina (29.1%)

15. Oklahoma (27.4%)

16. Arkansas (27.1%)

17. Maryland (25.8%)

18. North Dakota (25.2%)

19. Mississippi (25.0%)

20. Wyoming (23.8%)

21. Lousiana (23.8%)

22. Vermont (23.4%)

23. Maine (19.3%)

24. Utah (18.4%)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Put it in a thread by itself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. About exactly what was expected
A net loss of 10 delegates sucks, but it could be worse. We knew all along this would be a bad one for team Obama. Feels kinda like ripping off a scab.

Well, congrats to Team Clinton

Next week should be more fun for everyone! Today was kinda like I expect Mississippi was for the Clinton fans.

David

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good, I was expecting 19-9 so he'd still be up by over 160 del's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. If it's 19-9...
Then Obama's magic number shrinks to 24.

All he would need is 24 more pledged delegates to clinch the majority of PDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I'm getting 26.5
He currently has 1591.5 (this includes the switch from MD). 1627 is the number needed to claim a majority. With 9 tonight Obama will move to 1600.5 and need 26.5 more to get a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. 1618 is what is needed to claim the majority.
Regardless, he'll cross the that line on the 20th.

The 20th will be the last day Clinton will be able to leave the race with any dignity intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. 1627
There are 3253 pledged delegates. Half would be 1626.5, plus .5 to have 50% +1 makes 1627. Perhaps you meant the number guaranteed to have more delegates than Clinton, not the majority. Obama could lead in pledged delegates without having a majority because of Edwards 19 delegates. That drops the pool to 3234, 50% +1 would be 1617.5 (I'm guessing you rounded this up to 1618). So 1617.5 for a plurality or 1627 for a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. He picked up 3 pledged earlier today to add
2 in Ohio's certification and 1 pledged DC Al-Large (not super) switched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Those are in the GP numbers already
The Ohio certification moved the initial net gain of 9 for Clinton to 7, but The GreenPapers had already moved to this estimate based on results as they updated. They have also already adjusted their numbers for the MD PLEO that switched today (not DC). 1591.5 is the latest count for Obama, plus 9 tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. What's with this "majority" stuff? It's irrelevant.
Short of 2025 "pledged" delegates, it's going to the Convention, unless someone drops out. And when it does, because it doesn't look like anyone's dropping out, ALL delegates, both "pledged" and "super" are free to make up or change their minds right up to the final vote. Sorry to disillusion you. But. That's. How. It. Works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. He picked up 3 pledged today (2 in OH and 1 in DC) along with the ~9 tonight
That is a net 12 pledged (no supers).

I have 1594.5 + 12 (1606.5) or 20.5 short
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. I can't believe it was only 51% female. That's, like, not a question you can lie on. It could have
been a lot worse for O'Bama, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. that number will probably increase
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. 10% of her voters would vote McCain in the fall over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. 49% say most important candidate quality is "can bring change", interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
39. Just want to point out that young people are polling at a higher voting rate than people over 30----
18-29 is 12% of the population in WV, and they are polled at 14%.
It's just a stupid exit poll, but the young people are seriously voting today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC