Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russert: Clinton now wants to seat ALL of the Michigan delegates- no punishment at all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:39 PM
Original message
Russert: Clinton now wants to seat ALL of the Michigan delegates- no punishment at all
The rules are very clear: Those states that vote too early are NOT ALLOWED to seat more than 50% of their delegates. Clinton says we're not playing by those rules anymore.


And Obama wasn't even on the ballot.


How Clinton supporters might try to characterize seating ALL of the Michigan delegates as fair, after Michigan broke the rules and the voters COULDN'T EVEN VOTE FOR OBAMA, I have no idea.


This is just bullshit, Clinton folks.


You're tearing yourselves and the party apart, finding excuses to not play by the rules and hurt other people. Drop out already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's the only way she gets close
It's her nuclear option.

It's what she's playing for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. its one way to blame others for her loss, put it off on the DNC. Not sure
why she would want to do that. I don't think there is a vast left wing conspiracy but I wouldn't put it past her to invent one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that happens, Ill vote McCain. FUCK HILLARY
I dont give a shit if shes a Democrat, or a DINO really. Hillary is a VERY dangerous person, not fit for the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No you won't because AINT gonna happen. So don't worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. As awful as Hillary has become, I don't think she'd appoint Supreme Court justices
who would overturn Roe v. Wade. I don't like Hillary, but McCain is 100 x worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I understand what you are saying, but I cant express
how truly dangerous this woman is, she scares me. Maybe I wont vote McCain, but I will NEVER vote for her, and will laugh my ass off when she loses the general, if she ever gets that far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Realistically, I don't think you'll have to make that choice
because she isn't going to be the nominee. But I really can't imagine voting for McCain under any circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I'm not so sure about that.
She seems to have reinvented herself as a GOPer-why wouldn't she do the same in her administration and her choices? I would never have believed 6 months ago, a year ago she'd warp into what she has but now that I've seen it with my own eyes, I would not put anything, and I do mean anything past her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Voting mccain would help her..... she wants to run in 2012.


So if she steals the nomination by breaking the party rules, and the party lets her do it... then I'm done with the party.

If the party overrules the voters and the delegates, they will have made it clear they do not want me, my voice, or my support.

I'll go independent, and won't vote for president in 08.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Super Delegates will end this before long
Next week with a big win in Oregon Obama will get enough delegates to win the majority of the pledged delegates and the Super Delegates will do the rest as they have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. She can keep dreaming until dooms day if she wants, AINT GONNA HAPPEN !
Rules are rules. Period ! They'll get a compromise or get nothing and Obama will be the nominee either way. If Team-Hill wants to go down in history as the sorest loser and biggest RAGING WITCH in the history of the Democratic Party, just go ahead and try this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton appears to be a fan of Soviet-style elections
I wonder what kind of President she would make. How many Obama supporters would end up in her Gulags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Egyptian ones, too. Hey, anything to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton has ALWAYS been fighting for MI, right? I mean, that is what she said.
See my sig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. It would all be funny if it weren't so tragic...
Her intentions could not have been more clear. She means to tear this party apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. yes, just fuck off into to the night
please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. No punishment at all?!?! Couldn't they at least get Cheney to waterboard them a little?
You know, I see this Michigan and Florida thing more along the lines of a civil than a criminal matter. One big question in civil disputes is, what's the damage?

As it turned out, WHAT DAMAGE did Michigan and Florida cause by jumping forward? What ill-gotten gains did they gain? How were Iowa or New Hampshire hurt? In fact, turns out, if Mich and Florida had stayed late, they would have been guaranteed far more influence, thanks to Dr. Dean's Rube Goldberg maddeningly-proportional nominee selection machine.

No damages. So I really don't see the need for all this Old Testament justice, all this "punishment" that Obamatrons are thirsting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think the entire Primary system is stupid
however, the fact that she's suddenly wanting to count a state where she was the only option is completely pathetic and laughable.

Castro would be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Not seating 50% of the delegates would be called "punitive" in the civil courts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hillary can want in one hand and shit in the other ...
... and guess which one fills up first? (Not that she can tell the difference.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's cheat to win
that's the official strategy of the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. I Know Where Hillary Can Stick Those Goalposts
Someplace where they'll never move again ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama took his name off of the ballot voluntarily.
I am sure that helped him in the primaries of the anointed 4. But he shouldn't be whining about that decision now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Along with Biden, Richardson, Edwards...
and Kucinich..way back in October!! I think they should get delegates too! Split the delegates up among all the candidates!!!

Kucinich Files Affidavit To Remove Name From Michigan's Primary Shortly Before Deadline

October 10, 2007 8:19 a.m. EST
Ayinde O. Chase - AHN Staff
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008781843
Dover, NH (AHN) - The Kucinich for President campaign Tuesday afternoon officially requested that Kucinich's name be withdrawn from the Michigan Democratic primary ballot. The affidavit came by way of to the Michigan Secretary of State's office.The Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidates
National Campaign manager Mike Klein said in the statement, "We signed a public pledge recently, promising to stand with New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and the DNC-approved 'early window', and the action we are taking today protects New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary status, and Nevada's early caucus."
The statement continued: "We support the grassroots nature of the New Hampshire, small-state primary, and we support the diversity efforts that Chairman Dean and the DNC instituted last year, when they added Nevada and South Carolina to the window in January 2008. We are obviously committed to New Hampshire's
historic role." Klein who actually recently moved to Dover said, "We will continue to adhere to the DNC-approved primary schedule."

Governor Granholm and other Michigan Democratic leaders have openly criticized the decision by several presidential candidates to keep their names off the state primary ballot. The Michigan lawmakers are taken back by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Edwards and Bill Richardson's decision to withdraw their names from the January 15th ballot.

The only ones who remain on Michigan's primary ballot are Hillary Clinton, Mike Gravel and Chris Todd.



Editorial: Follow DNC rules on seating delegates
February 25, 2008
By Editorial Board

On September 1, the campaigns of Clinton and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) issued press releases stating that they had signed pledges affirming the DNC’s decision to approve certain representative states and sanction others for moving their nominating contests earlier. But now that the race is close, Clinton — whose top advisor Harold Ickes voted as a member of the DNC to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates — is pushing for the delegates to be seated.
Her argument is that not doing so disenfranchises the 1.7 million Florida Democrats who voted and that her pledge promised only that she wouldn’t campaign in the states, not that she wouldn’t try to seat the delegates. However, the results of the contests in Florida and Michigan are not necessarily representative of the voters’ preferences in those states. Given that most of the candidates removed their names from the
Michigan ballot, and that many voters stayed home from the vote in Florida with the understanding that their contest would not affect the final delegate count, the delegate totals that the candidates accumulated in these states may not accurately reflect the will of the voters. Had there been no restrictions in Michigan and Florida, the turnout, and thus the results, may have been different.

The Four State Pledge all candidates signed on Aug. 28 stated, “Whereas, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will strip states of 100% of their delegates and super delegates to the DNC National Convention if they violate the nomination calendar...


Therefore, I ____________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules ...pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window.” When the candidates pledged to campaign only in approved states, they were also agreeing to the terms listed above, which explicitly mentioned stripping noncompliant states of their entire delegation.



House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) recently said that the Florida and Michigan delegates should not be seated if they would decide the nomination. Other compromise proposals include holding new nominating contests in these states, but such contests would be expensive and cumbersome. The irony is that had Florida and Michigan not moved up their primaries, they would have voted in February and March, when they would have been even more important than in earlier months in determining the Democratic nominee — and would not have created an enormous controversy that has the potential to divide the party.
http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/2/25/editorialFollowDncRulesOnSeatingDelegates


Potential presidential nominees who did not want to appear on the Michigan January 15, 2008 presidential primary ballot could submit an affidavit with the Secretary of State by 4:00 p.m. on October 9, 2007. The January 15 date violates DNC rules, and five Democrats did submit the required affidavit: Biden, Edwards, Kucinich, Obama and Richardson. Clinton, Dodd and Gravel will appear on the Democratic ballot.

http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/chrnothp08/mi100907pr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's what worries me about this...
We've just had 7+ years of a president and an administration who believe that laws and rules don't apply to them.

Now here's Hillary, saying "those rules don't/shouldn't apply."

If she so cavilierly wants to disregard her own party's rules for her benefit, can she be trusted to restore dignity and adherence to the nation's laws if she's in a position of power?

I kind like don't think so... especially with her history of secretivness.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yep. Hillary "Banana Republic" Clinton.
Dear God, she is just such a horrible, miserable human being. She doesn't have a shred of decency.

Thank God that I renounced the Clintons long ago. I was always a strong democrat who could admit that the Clintons have always had problems with the truth. It's a good thing that *I* am a man of principle.

It is appalling, however, to watch those two sewer dwellers confirm my worst suspicions of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Those plus Huckabee's and Ron Paul's delegates might get her close.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. They could have written him in if they really wanted to vote for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC