Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama won 15 states by the Margin Hillary Clinton won WV by.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:38 AM
Original message
Obama won 15 states by the Margin Hillary Clinton won WV by.
Why is there even an ability to ignore that and pretend that this mattered as a loss?

Can some one explain this to me?

Why does it matter that Hillary Clinton won by this margin or even this delegate division?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's recent. People short attention span.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Precisely....this is expected because it is recent memory..no one remembers last weeks news...
let alone months back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Simply because "The Clintons" are considered Political Royalty ... they get umpteen "mulligans"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Don't think anyone's ignoring it- but the fact that this demographic is voting against him
-and not neccesarily for Clinton portends problems for the GE in key states like Pennsylvania, Ohio and possibly Michigan.

That should give pause to anyone who doesn't want a Republican in the whitehouse until 2013.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. His losses in OH and PA were single digits.
I don't know enough about MI to comment. He didn't run there.

So the narrative that this demographic is sizable and is voting against him seems to be mostly hype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They were still sizeable losses- to Hillary of all people
Edited on Wed May-14-08 04:02 AM by depakid
The only thing that gives me any hope of carrying those states and hence the GE is having the youth vote counter defections from the blue collar vote- and potentially winning in a squeeker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. People also vote for winners. If his campaign continues
to build momentum, Democrats will get behind him. And, the Republicans are looking to lose big this year. I think we'll be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer of 41 Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Vetted since + caucus
= anti-democratic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. Since she claimed victories in FL & MI
her entire campaign has been nothing but one delusion after another. It's as bad as the run-up to the war. I don't know what is wrong with the people in this country. No wonder it was so easy to sell everybody a war. I'll never wonder how the holocaust happened again either. People who want a particular outcome for personal reasons will believe anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure the bulk of those states were unrepresentative caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC