Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP uses Obama to boost its candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:02 AM
Original message
GOP uses Obama to boost its candidates
http://www.timeswv.com/headlinenews/local_story_124015923.html

GOP uses Obama to boost its candidates

Republicans clearly hope Obama is a Democratic albatross. The Republican Party and one of its conservative allies have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on ads portraying Obama as a liberal and tying Cazayoux and Childers to the Illinois senator.

“When it comes to taxes both Travis Childers and Barack Obama think alike — they both want to raise them,” says an ad by Freedom’s Watch, an outside group financed by wealthy Republican contributors.

The National Republican Congressional Committee, the branch of the national party that assists GOP candidates, has linked Childers and Cazayoux to Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. In Louisiana, the party’s ad says Obama and Pelosi represent “a radical agenda, very different from Louisiana’s values.”

NRCC Chairman Tom Cole, a GOP congressman from Oklahoma, this week said Republicans would rather run with Obama at the top of the Democratic presidential ticket than Clinton. That represents a change in attitude for Republicans, many of whom had argued earlier that Clinton would likely energize Republicans against her and thus help down ticket Republicans.


It's interesting to note that Childers had to distance himself from Obama in order to win back the Mississippi’s 1st District, a traditionally Democratic seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad they (and you) have failed in morphing Obama into Willie Horton.
Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
95. Yes.. worked well with Childers, LOL.. GOBAMA !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondbostonian Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your girl lost
She won't have a chance in 2012 either. She will never be President.

I don't care who you're voting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Andrea Mitchell says Hillary is no longer very popular in the Senate.
And therefore doesn't have much of a chance to be a power there, much less majority leader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Andrea Mitchell says ?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
61. It's obvious that Hillary has bridges to rebuild in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #61
68. Obvious?
Can you site an example ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #68
75. 'with us or against us'
Even lightweight political pundits can figure out that the Senate didn't appreciate her gas tax holiday pandering. Not just because it's a bad idea, but how she fruitlessly tried to score points at the expense of other Senators on this idea. So Hillary goes back to the Senate and rushes to get a piece of legislation started for this gas tax holiday. Yeah, I'm sure there are NO LOOPHOLES when you hastily rush legislation. No consulting with other members of the Senate. No building a coalition of support for the idea (unless you're counting just McCain). No backing from economists to bolster her claim to other Senators. She just rushed to get it started for election purposes, plain and simple. Then the 'with us or against us' along with asking every member of Congress get on the record about the gas tax holiday? A political no-no, and Hillary should have known better. You can pander all you want, but you better leave other members of Congress out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #61
76. There ain't enough duct tape, string, paper clips and concerete
to rebuild the bridges SHE'S burned....

It's over. she either steals this or she's gone. Forever.

Maybe city council in Little Rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
69. she is a gossip and you let her dupe you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. WELCOME BACK
CELEBRATION TIME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I think that should be the GOPs main strategy this fall...
Its worked so well for them...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wonder Woman? No way! More like *The Goddess of Egomania and Self-Righteousness.*
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL! It's even more interesting to note that the repukes massively failed
in their attempt to win by tying Childers and Cazayoux to Obama and Wright. No matter that Childers and Cazayoux distanced themselves from Obama, the repukes ran ad after ad and it still didn't work. As for MS-1 being a traditional dem district- so what? For the last 16 years it's been repuke and it wasn't until this year that we won it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. He said he had not asked for Obama's endorsement
He did not demand that Obama remove his endorsement of Childers from the Obama website and it remained, was even used against Childers during the election. That little game didn't work, the folks didn't care.

Guess that bothers the shit out of you, how all those expensive adds didn't help make hillary's case for the super delegates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama isn't much of an albatross
he's popular and likable.

But it's all they've got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. They tried but it back fired, Obama's coat tails are LONG!!!
Mississippi now has another Dem thanks to the Obama inspired voter turn out! GO OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. They did it and they lost.
I know you were rooting for the republicans on this one. Better luck next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. If by "boost" you mean "suicide", then sure.
Give it up. This is just pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah.. and
that worked out so well for them in Louisiana and Mississippi last week and last night. I recommend a new game plan for them. Try running as Independents. Bush has made the word "Republican" a dirty word.

That seat as well as the Louisiana seat has been in Republican possession for YEARS. Traditional Democratic seat my ASS. Read a paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I guess
Wright isn't going to work for the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Bush is a bigger
threat than Wright ever could be. The Louisiana seat was a 32 year Republican stronghold, the MS, 16 years! Those idiots had the great idea to send Cheney of all people down there to campaign for Davis. They really do NOT get how much people in their own party think they suck. I am loving every little second of it. They keep trying to frame it as a Democratic meltdown because of our long primary in order to divert attention away from their sad reality. That's the only hope they have. Ah, how sweet karma is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. One could say...
...that this strategy has failed quite miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. It obviously isn't boosting them
Using Obama in ads hasn't worked, they've lost to southern seats consecutively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. It didn't work in MS and it won't work in the general....
...McCain is too close to Bush and loyalty to Bush is what is destroying the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. and yet everyone else is saying that this seat was a Republican 'safe seat'
and the Democratic victory was a huge upset

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Albatross!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. What flavor is it?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. It doesn't have a flavor
It's a bleedin' seabird, innit, it's seabird flavor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
45. Do I get wafers with it?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Gonna stop now
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:00 AM by nxylas
Before we end up "performing" the entire sketch between us.

Edit: link to the script here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Oh Fine. Just leave me...
I'm so going to have serious abandonment issues over this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. Oh all right
Course you don't get bloody wafers with it. It's a bloody bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. I'll have two please...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. I've only got one
Umm, forgive me if I don't finish that sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. I was ready to hit the Alert Button
Thanks for playing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
70. I'll have two, please.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 10:31 AM by TahitiNut
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. Cazayoux took a seat Republicans held for 33 years
Not much of a boost. Or an albatross. Or whatever else Republicans think they're up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. After the GOP holds a seat for 13 years
It is no longer a traditional democratic seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. sorry, Obama will be the next President, and to boot the Democrats will control Congress
you are just going to have to learn to deal with that

Clinton ran a terrible campaign. Obama's campaign was brillant. That alone is an indication who is more capable

Of course if Hillary really wanted the nomination she should have recognized that her vote on the IWR was a mistake, and following up with a vote on the Kyle/lieberman ammendment only re-enforced that she learned nothing from her IWR vote

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. mega fail...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. R+10 is "traditionally Democratic"?????
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. You can look it up.
Or you can post Smilies.

1873-1877.....L. Q. C. Lamar..... Democratic
1877-1885.....Henry Muldrow...... Democratic
1885-1901.....John Allen......... Democratic
1901-1921.....Ezekiel Candler.... Democratic
1921-1953.....John Rankin........ Democratic
1953-1973.....Thomas Abernathy... Democratic
1973-1995.....Jamie Whitten...... Democratic
1995-2007.....Roger Wicker....... Republican
2008-.........Travis Childers.... Democratic

That right there is what you call traditionally Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Anything before 1950
Doesn't really count. We were much a different party than and the entire south was "Democratic"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Then, in the last 58 years it's been a traditionally Democratic seat.
46 years out of 58. 4 Democrats, one Republican.
Traditionally a Democratic seat since 1873. Or 1950, if you insist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. We took back a seat from the GOP than
Edited on Wed May-14-08 08:36 AM by Jake3463
why the heck are you people so up in arms over it.

3 special elections 3 victories.

I swear I think you people would be happy if we lost that seat to prove your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. "you people"?
Explain that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. I've seen more stupid
fighting over this by both sides of this silly primary war when its good news for both sides.

We can't even agree when the GOP loses a house seat right now. It's disgusting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
59. That's misleading. It was a Democrat seat, but a conservative-coalition Dem seat. After 1994,
all conservative-coalition Dem seats became Republican seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #32
72. "Strom Thurmond Democrats" you mean.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. All they do is motivate the Black vote in those small districts
Big time mistake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. You won the thread.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:35 AM by mystieus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. It worked great in Louisiana.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. Obama is simply UNELECTABLE in the GE!
He does NOT have the #'s NOW and WILL NEVER have them if the nom!!! It aint happening. Obama needs to drop out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I swear
the gall of you people that the guy who is winning by every metric.

You know what in 2012 no primaries at all. We'll just do an AOL poll and see who the better candidate is. Winner take all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #40
52. Some of these posts are like political Tourette's Syndrome...
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #40
78. you really should step out and get some TRUTH!
Edited on Wed May-14-08 11:06 AM by indimuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Listen
I'm not into cults. Ok, sell Hillaryland somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. oh...oh..oh..YOU R knee deep baby!
Get real!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. What is the point of that collection of pictures
You're trying to make a point, but what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
43. Fail
I guess you missed that Childers won last night, and it was never supposed to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
44. You and Hillary must be bummed
that every time the GOP tries to tie a Dem to Obama, the Dem wins. My condolences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
47. MS-01 is R+10 Your post is idiocy.
LA-06 was R+5

The Obama ads HELPED the democrats, ostensibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
91. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
49. "Traditionally Democratic" on the MS Congressional district-level does not equal
Democratic on the national level. Kerry lost the district by 25% and Gore by 19%; I'm sure Childers would have distanced himself from both of them, just as he did with Obama. He likely would have even chosen to distance himself from (gasp! dare I even suggest it?) Hillary Clinton as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #49
73. Actually, they tried to tie him to Kerry too.
They said that in the 2004 election he donated money to the most liberal senator evah, or some such meme :rofl:

The kitchen sink efforts of the GOP didn't work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
53. Worked so well for them in MS
I'm done giving much consideration to "Democrats" who say they refuse to vote for Obama if he is the nominee. Votin against your best interests is not a progressive move at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
54. We already know the GOP prefers Hillary.
Tell us something we don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
58. And yet their attempt to smear Childers with Obama gave the Democrats one of the most conservative
districts in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
60. And this is working out VERY WELL for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
62. Worked real well in Mississippi yesterday. Real well.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
63. let's not forget they're trying to make him Muslim as well (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
64. The rethugs had that seat for 13 years!
Even the democrats from that constituency are pretty conservative. It was the right move for Childers to distance himself from the party figures and associate more with the voters to win that seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #64
82. 1873 to 2008, only 12 years in GOP hands. A traditionally Democratic seat.
And Obama almost cost us the election to win it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #82
93. Almost cost us the election to win it back by 8 or 9 points?
Yea. He might almost cost us the GE too.

Stop it. You're scaring me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
65. They have tried thrice and failed thrice
I think the Repubs are sounding the ALERT that they are too WUSSIFIED to stand up to PRESIDENT OBAMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
67. Obama's coat tails are 3/3 for getting Democrats elected. Clinton is *killing* Democrats' campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
71. Newt G said GOP efforts have failed using Obama in ads. Haha..
That is good news and yes 3 out of last 3 congress races were won by a dem and rePubes were running anti-Obama ads to smear that candidate.

This is good news.. Newt says he is worried about this election too.. LMFAO..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
74. umm MS1 is an R+10 district
Its been a republican seat for a dozen years! and yes it was Dixicr.... erm I mean democrat before that:

Whitten was originally a very conservative segregationist, as were many of his colleagues from Mississippi and the rest of the South. He signed the Southern Manifesto condemning the U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown vs. Board of Education, which desegregated public schools. Along with virtually the entire Mississippi congressional delegation, he voted against the Civil Rights Acts of 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Whitten later apologized for these votes, calling them a "mistake" caused by severe misjudgment. He voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

--

When his views were too extreme to keep hi min office he evolved them but the fact in a seat won for the past 6 cycles by 10+ points for republicans that a dem won it 'even after being tied to Obama' its a good sign of things to come for democrats..

Of course the R's are claiming that they would rather have Obama, he is going to win and they have to put on their war paint. I guarantee if Huckabee or Romney won the DNC would be saying 'this fits into our master plan' its their job to spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
77. Blinding insight. They would have used this button if Hill were the favorite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
81. They TRY to use Obama to boost their candidates. Tried it in Mississippi
and lost to Childers. And, your "traditionally Democratic seat" is utter bullshit.

Ever stop to think that if Hillary was the presumptive nominee, they would try and use her to boost their candidates????

Nah, I bet you didn't stop to think about that.

And, as far as Tom Cole is concerned, of course he is saying that. He'd be saying he'd rather run against Clinton if she were going to be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
83. The point is that HE WON! They tried to tie Obama to him as a negative, but it didn't work
Dick Cheney campaigning for him probably hurt more than trying to link Childers to Obama

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-s-mcelvaine/paintin-it-blue-in-missis_b_101625.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #83
99. The point is, to win, he had to distance himself from Obama
As will many others have to do if we nominate Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
84. Their strategy hasn't worked, has it?
Let them keep it up! GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
85. Traditionally Dixiecrat is not traditionally Democratic
The seat is R+10 for crying out loud. Those that inhabited the seat prior to Wicker would not be considered Democrats in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
86. The traditionally Democratic seat
was actually Dixiecrat Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Jamie Whitten was the Dixiest of Dixicrats, however:
The seat was traditionally a Democratic one, not a Republican one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. Pre-1994 conservative-coalition Democrat seats are no different environments than Republican seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
89. The last three GOP seats up went to the Dem ran ads featuring Obama and Rev. Wright.
Brilliant strategy :silly: that I whole-heartedly endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Oh yeah?! Just think how much MORE those seats woulld have gone to the Dems
if they hadn't run those ads! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
94. makes me endorse obama all the more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
96. This GOP strategy so far has BACKFIRED getting more Democrats in office. My blessings to continue!
Edited on Wed May-14-08 05:18 PM by quantass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
97. All it does is energize young voters and black voters in these districts
GOP are better off just scaring the shit out of people with terror threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
98. Bring it on
This is a losing recipe and it's gonna prove more and more losing as time goes on.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
100. They would never bash Hillary.
Although I might not be the best person to ask about that as I spent 1991-2000 in a coma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC