Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about the timeliness of a a female President.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:52 PM
Original message
Question about the timeliness of a a female President.
With America's number one enemies being from a culture that makes a point to degrade, undervalue, or downright mistreat women, how do you think America would be viewed by those Middle Eastern countries to whom we hope to be diplomatic if we have a female President?

Someone brought up this point up in conversation recently, and I recanted that it didn't seem to hinder Madeline Albright when she was the SOS, and that person is more or less the diplomatic face of the nation.

Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't give a shit about what they'd think. If Clinton were (IMHO) the best candidate I would have
voted for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess I phrased it wrong...
Do you think it would have made a difference in our interactions with those nations? Keep in mind that our "allies" in that part of the world have the same views of women. Look at the Saudis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think it would've made a difference if we had a leader they respected,
rather than the chimp, whether that leader be man or woman. * was and still is the laughing stock of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. There are other countries with female leaders.
They have to command respect as leaders, not only as women.

I think it would be like saying that Obama cannot be the nominee because people will not vote for a black man. Do we need to deny the nomination to African Americans forever because of bigots? (There are other reasons I prefer someone else as the nominee). Do we kowtow to bigots, or to countries that demean women? If we were still dealing with apartheid countries, would that mean we would avoid having people of color in leadership positions just to "respect" to a resource rich ally? Are we republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I don't think we can base our decisions on the backward cultural practices of other parts of the
world. I'm sorry if that offends anyone, but the treatment of women in most Middle Eastern countries is not just "different". It is flatly wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not an issue
Edited on Wed May-14-08 03:01 PM by nichomachus
the leaders of these countries -- who are the people she would deal with -- are not anti-woman. They just pretend to be to play to the ignorant masses. Just as the leaders of the GOP really aren't against abortion or aren't really Christian. They just pretend to be to get votes.

I had a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia. He said it was an experience being in first class flying back and forth. As soon as the plane left Islamic airspace, the women would ditch their burqas for their designer clothes and the Manolo Blahniks, the men would start tossing down the top-shelf booze. On the way back, it was just the opposite. It would start out as a party flight and once they approached Islamic airspace, the booze would disappear and the burqas would go back on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would never support acting in fear of the judgement of bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Which is the same as saying
that we shouldn't nominate a candidate just because he or she will get more votes from racists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. as many arguments can be made for as against
making it meaningless except to people concerned with surface instead of substance.

In the world political stage it is the very height of folly to assume one knows for certain what cultural factors influence credibility, given that there are as many exceptions as there are rules in the game of gender-based credibility.

In the end, presently, and when we are hoary old history merely one generation or administration hence, we are nothing more but words on paper. If the words mean something, if what follows from those words means something, that is what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think anyone at this point
that represents a clean break from Dumnya's policies would be more welcome. When I see Dumya overseas, it looks like the other leaders are amusing Dumnya, because he is like a fragile child that may throw a tantrum at any time and blow up the world. His last trip to Saudia Arabia, the local papers there were all bashing Bush as a mindless idiot (of course, they never printed it in English)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. a female President like a Black President would be a disaster
A President who happens to be a President will be a great reason to celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Madeline Albright did NOT EVER play "the victim" nor "the mercenary"
Edited on Wed May-14-08 03:45 PM by ShortnFiery
She is balanced. HRC is NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chalco Donating Member (817 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Albright is balanced and HRC is not?
What the hell are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. That is hardly a decent standard for picking a leader here.
That would be akin to Roosevelt removing all Jewish cabinet members and appointments during WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC