Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I figured out why the notion of Jim Webb as VP is appealing to me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:57 AM
Original message
I figured out why the notion of Jim Webb as VP is appealing to me.
I like Richardson and the other possibilities that people have put forth except for Wes Clark. I want no military careerists anywhere near the White House. I don't consider Webb a military careerist, in fact, I think he would be the Pentagon's worst nightmare.


In any case, if we ran with Obama-Webb, our ticket would have the Good cop / Bad cop thing down pat!


You got to admnit, Jim Webb would be a BAAAD cop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good piece in TPM yesterday about how Webb can help Obama
But Clinton's West Virginia landslide does mean that Obama, for reasons that go beyond race, has a problem with Appalachia's whites and the Scots-Irish who settled there and forever branded its culture.

As Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., argues in his 2004 book, ``Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America,'' the Scots-Irish are a particularly pugnacious people, self-reliant and hyper-individualistic, who place honor above profit.

These are the people whose ancestors lived and fought along the brutal borderlands between England and Scotland, and later in Northern Ireland (they are the Protestants of Ulster). Unlike other British settlers, the Scots-Irish, Webb writes, migrated ``directly to the wilderness of the Appalachian Mountains, bypassing even the rudiments of colonial civilization.''

Frequently occupying the lower rungs socially and economically, they have always been the most likely to fight and die for their country, Webb writes. They don't cling to guns; they proudly pass them on to their young sons as a rite of passage Webb likens to a ``Redneck Bar Mitzvah.'' Webb's father gave him his first rifle when he was 8 and his first pair of boxing gloves when he was 6.

Around the same time, his father laid out ``the eternal ground rules for street fighting,'' which now find their echoes in the last days of the Clinton campaign: ``Never start a fight, but never run away, even if you know you are going to lose. ... And whomever you fight, you must make them pay. You must always mark them, so that the next day they have to face the world with a black eye or a cut lip or a bruised cheek, and remember where they got it.''

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/05/its_an_appalachia_problem_not_1.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Ah, yes, my people. Webb could be talking about the things my father
gave, an said to me....virtually identical.

Fortunately, I accidentally had ONE great teacher, in the third grade, who helped me grow a brain....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If we're talking about the same people, they only do things by extremes -
either very wrong or very right, but willing to fight to the death no matter what!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Except for Webb's sexist comments years ago about women

being fit for the military - and THAT in my opinion makes him unfit to be V.P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think someone a little rough around the edges
has a definite appeal, not to mention that it gives us Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. What was Webb's position on the IWR IN 2002? I think he's generally too hawkish
I strongly think the pick should be (1) a woman and (2) someone who NEVER EVER supported the Iraq War Resolution. AND DEFINITELY NOT HILLARY. Barbara Boxer fills that bill well, although there might be others.

What do people think about Sebelius (who I learned today is the daughter of a past Gov of Ohio), Napolitano, Stabenow or others?

If Obama must "realistically" pick a centrist male, what about Schweitzer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent question - I had to do some googling, but here 's your answer:
MR. RUSSERT: Did you go see Senator Allen and talk to him about the war in Iraq before it began?


MR. WEBB: Yes, I did. I wrote a piece for The Washington Post six months before we went into Iraq, laying out in my view this was not about WMDs, it was about our troops being turned into terrorist targets, and that there was not an exit strategy because the people in this administration who were doing this did not intend to leave. I went and saw Senator Hagel, I went and saw Senator Allen. I spent an hour with Senator Allen discussing this with him. And from that point forward I decided that, although I had perhaps a, you know, a political—a personal regard for him on one level, politically that I could not support him anymore.

Meet the Transcript for Sept. 17
George Allen, Jim Webb

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14815993/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That bumps up Webb (generally to far right for my preference) to my short list nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. When he reminds Repubs that he was in Reagan's Cabinet...
That will be all many Repubs will need to vote for Obama. Many like him anyway, but with Webb on the ticket, that would be the clincher, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. My only problem with him is that he's a little too "Type A" to jive with the new administration.
I see Senator Biden being the perfect fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musiclawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've reconsidered as well
I wanted Clark for purposes of party unity etc. I was afraid of losing a senate seat. But no longer. Clark can still be offered an important position, and the upside to having Webb on-deck far outweighs any downside (the conventional wisdom being that two senators should not run). I think these are extraordinary times where certain risks must be taken. Sorry no women. No Richardson. The country is not ready for that type of ticket IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good thread
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SparkyMac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Webb is too good a man to waste as VP.

We need to put him somewhere so he can kick ass and take names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC