Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Angry Clinton Backers Vow to Undermine Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:22 PM
Original message
Angry Clinton Backers Vow to Undermine Obama
With Dems like these..... :argh:


from The Politico:



May 15, 2008
Categories: Hillary Clinton

Clinton backer backlash


My colleague Beth Frerking reports on something we're likely to hear a lot more about in coming days: Grumblings from the almost-half of the party, disproportionately women, whose candidate is losing.

An Ohio-based group of Democratic Hillary Clinton supporters say they’ll work actively against Sen. Barack Obama if he becomes the nominee, arguing that Clinton has been the subject of “intense sexism” by party leaders and the media.

Led by Boomer-aged women, the group, Clinton Supporters Count Too, is holding a press conference in Columbus at noon to release this statement.

Organizers Cynthia Ruccia, 55, and Jamie Dixey, 57, both from the Columbus area, say they’re coordinating women, men, minorities, union members and others in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan – all important swing states next November – to impress upon Democratic party leaders what they think has been outright discrimination – and not of the racial kind.

“We have been vigilant against expressions of racism, and we are thrilled that the society has advanced that way” in accepting Obama as a serious candidate,” Ruccia said. “But it’s been open season on women, and we feel we need to stand up and make a statement about that, because it’s wrong.”

With growing calls for Clinton to leave the race, she said, women feel like “we’re being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program.”


Hard to know what to make of any given group, but the sentiment is clearly out there, and putting the party back together will be Obama's, and Clinton's, challenge.

Oh, and they're doing O'Reilly tonight, of course.


http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Clinton_backer_backlash.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those aren't democrats. If they are, they'll
come to their senses and support the Democratic Nominee without causing any damage to the party. Or they can live with McCain stripping them of their right to choose by appointing RW judges. Not to mention the whole Iraq war thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Whatever. They are going to do what they are going to do. Let's move to the GE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
90. From what I have been reading on the Blogs ....
There are millions of them! November may not be pretty for us if this continues. I think the John Edwards endorsement was staged and intented to be a slap in Hillary's face....That unfortunately has caused great pain for our Party!

We reap what we sow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #90
138. Millions? In their dreams
If there are millions of them, how come HRC can't raise funds like Obama can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #90
140. LOL, Millions?! They couldn't get 50 people to show up for a Clinton protest
in New York City, a city of 8 million, which Clinton represents in the U.S. Senate! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #90
147. we didn't sow this HRC did
Millions of women support Obama, and those who support her JUST because she's a woman are fucking idiots.

Have they considered what she has NOT done in the past 7 years in the Senate at all.

HRC is about HRC and the ONLY fight she has shown has been for her own power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #90
187. right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
143. These ARE Democrats. And it has been open season on women this primary.
Both the media and Obama supporters have been worse than I could have ever imagined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #143
148. open season??? No, people don't like HRC because
of what she's done:

IWR
Patriot Act
Going along with Bush to get along and get ahead
Triangulation
Assumption of inevitability
Poor loser
Kitchen sink

Hillbots just want to blame her gender because they can't handle the TRUTH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #148
156. Yep. They just can't grasp the fact that some people don't Hillary for herself and couldn't care...
....less about her sexual organs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. ... and stupidly vow to undermine THEMSELVES!
Hate Obama all you want - but if you like Hillary because of her positions, then it is utterly stupid to not vote for Obama. He & Hillary are about 2 inches apart from each other on issues... the difference is the vehicle that the issues arrive to Washington in.

The difference between McCain & Clinton is astounding. But, if you want to "punish" the DNC or Obama for stealing away Hillary's "right" to be president - go for it. Sit through 4 more years of a Republican.. and then watch Hillary still not get elected in 4 - 8 more years, because now MORE then half of the country hates her (it used to only be half).

But whatever.. i know many who like to cut their noses off frequently.. so, cut away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They want John Mccain controlling their uterus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
96. And not just their uterus...
The next pick to the Supreme Court is about giving the far right a clear majority on every issue. Privacy, equal rights, separation of church and state, the commerce clause... the list goes on and on. This is just sheer stupidity on this part. I'd actually be able to admire Hillary a little if she puts an end to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pompano Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
100. Or their pay...
as opposed to their male counterparts in the workplace.

Not to mention Mc Hundreds hundred year war? Say goodbye to Rowe v. Wade. Say hello to $10.00 a gal gas. Say goodbye to organized labor as whats left of it.

For the women that choose to be homemakers well they can become tent makers or cardboard box makers as the McIdon'tknoweconomics policies more than likely triple home foreclosures.

That'll show those Obama supporters, won't it? Na-Na-Na-Nuh_Na_Na.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. I think they're doing huge harm to the cause of feminism
with this.

It reads as nothing more than sour grapes. From a group of people who would eagerly put their hurt feelings above the good of the country. And to what purpose?

Hillary Clinton is not a feminist icon. She doesn't (nor could any one person) represent all the hopes and dreams of feminism. Her opponent would be at least as likely to further gender equality. But they don't like him, because he's not their candidate. So they'll toss the whole thing and stamp their feet. That'll show us all!

Despicable. Time for this bunch to grow the hell up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. "Clinton Supporters Count Too" .. honestly sounds like a 7th grade girl's club.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 03:31 PM by votesomemore
Call me sexist all you want (I'm not). She is lying about racism not being an issue in the race.

I am SO PISSED to be part of the demographic they are lumping to Hillary. I can't stand her or her dupes.
SORE LOSERS. Team playing is not taught to girls. That should be corrected, but it is obvious from the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
93. Geez, what have 7th grade girls done to you?
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. ran against the democratic nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. It absolutely does
harm it. Even if she were the icon they've made her out to be, it paints women as emotional, irrational, sore losers. It was Hillary who said if you can't stand the heat, and all that jazz. My GOD more women should speak out to women like this because they're embarrassing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
92. Gee, what cause are smug Obama supporters destroying?
Geez, when you hear of some guys doing something you don't like, does the cause of mankind take a beating? :sarcasm:

It's not up to you to decide for others who is or isn't a feminist icon to them. Maybe it's time for you to grow up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. They can join Joe Lieberman
These Clinton supporters are so blind to Hillary's dark side that they can't see that they are walking the same path as Joe Lieberman.

Karma is a B*tch and Hillary is finding out that its a bigger one than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. screw all 8 of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. LOL....
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama's best course is to expect nothing from Clinton supporters, and campaign accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Clan takes many forms
it has to be more subtle now and can't just run around with the white hats.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24588813/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Female Clinton supporters are Klan members?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. And ALL male Clinton supporters
are Storm Fronters.
Seriously folks - the bottom line is always respect. That and the very REAL need to keep key issues up front and visible.
No-one needs to be pushed to the edge. If democrats have learned any lesson over the past decades it is that we all matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Question: Is it more sexist to not vote for Clinton because you dont like her?
Or is it more sexist for a group to try to undermine an entire election because she's a woman that couldnt win on her own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
139. word
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayouBengal07 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not quite.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 03:28 PM by BayouBengal07
"women feel like “we’re being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program.”"

No, women aren't being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program. Democrats are being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program. Their gender has nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's HILLARY'S responsibility to make it clear that this is not appropriate.
No more "wink wink nod nod"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Absolutely spot on
If Hillary doesn't tell these people to stop, she should be forced out of the nomination process by the DNC.

Hillary needs to:

- Concede defeat at some point before the convention
- Endorse Barack Obama directly at point of concession
- Remind her supporters that getting a democrat in office is the number one priority of any Hillary Clinton supporter

If she fails to do that, it's clear what her intentions are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
85. Agree
Man, it is an election process - sometimes you win, or lose, or draw, and I am not interested in people who lose and automatically pretend it is sexism (or racism or add your fav "ism").

There are far more people who act like kids throwing a tantrum now days than I ever remembered seeing when I was going up and growing old. I don't like the trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
102. Hillary doesn't control what we say, think and do....
Obama may have control of YOU but Hillary doesn't control me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
99. Hillary doesn't get to dictate how people vote...
neither do you, or Obama or anyone else.

I'm not obligated to sit down, shut up and do what I'm told by the Democrats or anyone else.

I don't OWE anyone my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #99
105. You're willing to vote for Hillary because you believe in her but when
she says to vote for the Democratic nominee regardless of who it is, you don't believe her or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. I don't do hero worship....
I don't "believe in" Hillary. I agree with many of her positions and I appreciate what she has done for women and children throughout her life. I don't worship her, I don't blindly follow her. Maybe, as an Obama supporter, that's tough for you to understand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #106
136. So then whats your problem with Obama ?
their positions for the most part are pretty similar. Unless you like the warmonger stuff from Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #136
159. Do you feel better that you got your slam
into the discussion? I guess that's the end of this otherwise rather civil discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #106
161. Did I say anything about "worship'? I did not. Don't put words in my mouth.
As an Obama supporter, I like you, believe in my candidate. Unlike you however, I am a Democrat and realize that if a Democrat does not win this year, the US is fucked. I would vote for Hillary if she were the nominee but that doesn't look likely now does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #106
188. You certainly have no problem with her proven lies.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #105
121. she'll throw her fellow women under the bus without hesitation out of sheer bitterness.
clinton would have no use for such a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #121
160. Maybe the female Obama supporters are the one's guilty
of throwing their fellow women under the bus. Why should I feel any loyalty to them when they felt none? If they were so worried about their reproductive rights maybe they should have supported the woman who has made that so much of her business. yet, they preferred to vote for someone who voted PRESENT on those issues. Your pathetic attempt to try and make me feel guilty failed hugely.


Did someone invite you to what was previously a civil discussion? Feel better now that you got to vent against me since you seem to love to seek out my posts to make your snarky comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #160
164. Obama has a 100% rating for NARAL. Do you have a response for that?
I don't seek your posts out, but if I come across them, I feel compelled to say something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #164
176. Hillary Clinton has a 100% rating from NARAL also
v
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #99
162. hey, you want to call me a "lowlife piece of shit" again like you did yesterday shillbot?
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:29 PM by dionysus
why aren't you doing your job being the site administrator for capital shill?

you people are so pathetic you have to use the DU PM system to screen people who sign up for that pathetic pile of a web site...

"due to obama supporters trying to join our site please PM me, blackvelvet04, on DU"

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. They aren't Democrats they're Limb-bots
These are the dregs of Operation Chaos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Go for it. Get ready for President McCain...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. They're playing right into one of the negative female stereotypes
...the vengeful, spiteful "woman scorned".

That might get a short-term result, but it won't garner long-term respect.

And if Hillary wants to hold onto any of her political capital, she'd be smart to own up to, or if she's incapable of doing that, at least reach out to repair the damage she's done playing the "Don't pick on the girl" card she and Bill play when it suits her in between rattling her "Obliterate Iran" saber and getting lauded by her surrogates on her impressive "cojones".

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
62. Only uneducated, misogynist right wingers fall for that
Which one are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. when are some of you peeps gonna get it>>>>Politico is a rightwing site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
71. I'm glad someone else said this, I'm a female boomer from Ohio, I'm
very active in politics (precinct chairman))and I have never heard of this group so I'm am inclined to believe the poster who said they or limbots and rightwingers trying to cause a ruckus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
78. LOL! Talk about hypocrisy. You only criticize the source when it suits you.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 07:06 PM by JTFrog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #78
137. Got it long ago
that ones gonna leave a mark.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
178. Hear hear
v
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sour grapes isn't a feminist response to losing -- It's a sore loser response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Loud-mouthed fools, all of them.
At least as stupid as anyone else who will vote against their own interests and the good of the country because of one, relatively minor, hot-button issue.

Let them try to undermine Obama. Those of us who see the bigger picture will sweep them away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Clinton's loss had little or nothing to do with her gender
It had to do with her poorly run campaign, and her arrogant attitude that she was the inevitable nominee, and thus did not have to work for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can we dispense with the illusion that Hillary is some "poor defenseless oppressed woman"
How about the reality that she is a willing member of an organization which has undermined the Democratic party for over 20 years?

How about the fact that her husband's term, which she erroneously claims as HER experience is responsible for NAFTA, the 1996 Telecommunications Act, The Indefensible Marriage Act and many other things which still affect this country - and not in a good way - to this day?

How about the fact that she has, and continues to (as recently as West Virginia) use race baiting and makes blatant claims about getting the WHITE vote??

It's not her gender that is the problem. It's her twisted dark soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
149. exactly... you said it so well
Edited on Fri May-16-08 06:48 AM by Carolina
but Hillbots can't accept the truth so they cry foul sexism. How stupid.

Anyway, millions of women truly do support Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. *BREAKING* Small Group makes Big Noise ..... Nobody Cares ... Film at 11 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. I hope they enjoy it when abortion is outlawed
by McCain's new supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Most of Them Probably Won't Be Directly Affected
If abortion were outlawed, after young women of child-bearing age, young men who've become accustomed to casual sex would be the most affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Clinton supporters couldn't do more to undermine feminism
if they choose this tactic. Third wave feminists who support Obama will have one more reason to dismiss these women and see them as a problem, not a solution. And those who go along with them will find they will lose female votes in the future.

My opposition to Clinton has NOTHING to do with her being a female. Is it really so hard for some women to understand that simply being a woman does not mean other women must support someone? How anti-feminist is that?

I am looking at candidates and evaluating them on the basis of my opinion about what is best for this nation. I do not think dynastic politics are best for this nation. I do not think a continuation of the Clinton political machine is best for this nation. I do not want Hillary in office because I do not think she is the best candidate to deal with issues that are important to me.

I want to see a female president in my lifetime. Clinton is not that female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ruccia is a piece of work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Good find, Ruccia also employs gutter politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. She's only used those tactics against Republicans
If you're a Republican, I can understand why you wouldn't like her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
75. I'm sorry but Democrats shouldn't use homophobia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #55
168. She is threatening to help the Republicans beat us if Obama is the nominee
If she wants to help Republicans and hurt Democrats, especially in a crucial election like this one, then she's fair game. She should be treated just like Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity or any other member of the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. She sounds pretty courageous, good for her
Anyone with the guts to challenge the GOP's fair haired Ohio guy, John Kasich during the dark years of GOP repression gets my support. Where is Kasich these days?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good For Them!
I'm sorry there are people who don't see the necessity behind this and who don't or won't see the sexist and gender-based attacks that were freely utilized this cycle.

If women don't stand up against this now and promise the party some payback if the shit doesn't stop, or if there isn't some form of make good, sexism will remain an accepted campaign tactic against female candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. yeah, good for them! Planning to throw their support to a man who called his wife
the "c" word, and who's vowed to appoint justices like Scalia. Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. not to worry cali-i keep hearing O has it in the bag on Du. besides no where
does it say they will not actually vote for mccain. so keep cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
73. Get off these boards, you McCain lover. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
141. If you support these idiots, then please fuck off!
Seriously.

Roe V Wade and other issues regarding women's privacy and reproductive health may mean little to you, but it does to millions of other women. You want to destroy many accomplishments made during the feminist movement, go right ahead...but do it elsewhere. This board doesn't welcome supporting republicans or third party candidates during presidential elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #141
146. Roe v Wade, Roe v Wade, Roe v Wade
I swear ... y'all must think we're all freaking Pavlov's dog.

Find another bell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #146
165. If you don't understand the significance of a permanent conservative majority on the SC
you are too stupid for me to waste my time with.

As I said. If you support these fuckers, adios. Go support McCain's grand invasions. After all, your candidate did say he is qualified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. Brand recognition loyalty.
That's all it is in so many of these instances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. That'll teach us women a lesson!
How to cut off our my nose to spite my own face is a lesson I've always longed to learn. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. There are better qualified female VP picks than Hillary. ..
Edited on Thu May-15-08 04:11 PM by mystieus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. I disagree with some here
in that I think that there are a lot more of these women/Clinton supporters who feel this way than you think. Have any of you even peeked at the Hillary Clinton forum? There are a lot of them there. I am NOT saying that I agree with them - quite the opposite. But right now they are so upset and feel so ignored that they are going to these extremes to make sure that they're heard. i think the dems need to reach out to them, listen and try to understand what they're saying. Not necessarily give in to demands that "hillary should be made the nominee", but don't ignore them and tell them that their vote isn't important. That's ridiculous.

Let's face it BO is going to be the nominee and they're hurting. Both he and Clinton need to address this soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. of course some of her supporters wont vote but we have to move on at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. If you have to go on O'Reily to get your message out, you may not be a democrat.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. It makes no sense
Going on the television show of a known sexist pig.

What are they thinking?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
179. When asked Obama said he is going to go on O'Reilly or has
he done so already? I rarely what that TV show. It is worse than GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. I can't believe how stupid, selfish and hateful some people are,
and I've been around a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
44. Piss on 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. 27 electoral votes slipping away. Piss on 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Way to show that Obama supporters aren't women bashers...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. bashing THOSE women, yes
not ALL women, so unwad your panties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
180. Heaven forbid that Obama supporters would bash women!
Never never never...well.. just Hillary maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
81. Whoa, is that language necessary?
I am an Obama supporter but as a woman I am offended by the use of the c word. It's not acceptable, period. You really make Obama look bad with crap like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #45
142. Piss on you!
Actually piss on all of us, if this is the way you and other supporters of your whiny loser of a candidate feel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. they'll try, and they'll fail
this party is better off without Lieberman Democrats like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. yeah, look how we fucked Lieberman...er wait a minute. never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Good point.
Indeed if Clinton stages an independent run for the presidency we will lose in November. That was your point, wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
51. So they prefer a woman's right to choice to be overturned by the Supreme Court?
b/c that is exactly what will happen with McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. They prefer a candidate who respects ALL women's issues
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:11 PM by OzarkDem
and knows there are many more issues important to women than birth control and the right to an abortion.

Shame on any candidate or group of people who trivialize women in such a manner, as if their only identity and importance is related to their reproductive organs. Eff off with that.

On edit: I always find it interesting that the men in the Democratic party only care about the women's issues that pertain to some man being the unfortunate participant in an unplanned pregnancy. Your selfishness is duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #54
74. They're knuckle-dragging morons if they support McCain.
Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #74
123. But Hillary respects "all women's issues", and you're "selfish" for bringing up Roe v. Wade!
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:48 PM by impeachdubya
Yes! She respects ALL womens issues, not just the ones you bad selfish mens are on about! ALL of 'em!

ALL of 'em!

What they are, specifically, I can't really say, but there are lots of 'em, they're important to women, and Obama doesn't give a shit about 'em!

Really!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #74
135. Did you really say "Period."?
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #54
120. What PRECISE "women's issues", as you put it, does Obama not respect that Hillary does?
Please.

Be specific.

Really, I'd like to know what's more important that birth control and the right to an abortion. I'm all ears. Specifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #54
134. McCain opposes equal pay legislation
Clinton and Obama both support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #54
150. and WAR is a woman's issue???!!!
Hillary, the warmonger, the IWR aye-voter, they saber rattler against Iran...

The woman who as Senator (which is her only real experience not derived from being Bill's wife) has mostly gone along with Bush to get politically ahead.

Spare me, HRC fights for HRC and power only.

Interesting that Marian Wright Edelman, a real fighter for children and families and FORMER Clinton friend, has not said a word or endorsed the woman that Samantha Power correctly called a monster!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
56. Then I hope they stop calling themselves Democrats.
And Ms. Ruccia, what you're being told is that Obama is winning. I'm sorry if you can't accept reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. They're the best kind of Democrats
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:12 PM by OzarkDem
the ones who stand up for the candidate who represents the base of the Democratic party - women voters.

As info: 52-55% of Dem voters are women. Since when do we need more men telling us they can lead better than we can lead ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Sorry, but I don't support Hilary. And guess what? I made up my
own mind.

To use your logic, I should support Hilary ONLY because she's a woman.

I'm sorry you aren't strong enough to make up your own mind, but are only buying into the groupthink that says a woman, any woman, is the way to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:18 PM
Original message
There are a few exceptions
but most long-time, loyal Dem women voters are making a stand to support a woman president, and for good reason.

If you don't like the Democratic party, leave it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
65. What I don't like is people trying to cram someone down my throat
just because she's a woman.

You want me to turn my mind off and blindly choose someone because we share the same gender.

Ain't going to happen.

Oh, and do not EVER tell me to leave the party. You are way out of line on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Then respect other Democrats' choices
as they respect yours. And accept that this race is a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. I do respect choices. I don't respect people who are trying to ignore
the reality that Obama is ahead, and are using claims of sexism to get their way.

AND THE RACE IS NOT A DRAW.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. Clinton ahead in the popular vote
Number of people who have voted for Clinton: 16,710,298 or 47.7%. Number of people who have voted for Obama: 16,680,827 or 47.6%. SO IT IS A DRAW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #79
88. No, it isn't, and popular vote is not how we decide candidates.
You may not like that, but it is what it is.

AND AGAIN, IT IS NOT A FUCKING DRAW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #79
89. I don't know where you got that figure, but actually we don't know how many votes...
either candidate has got since four caucus states did not report votes, only delegates. So we don't know how many votes either candidate got in those states. Therefore, it is inaccurate to say that Clinton is leading in popular votes since it is impossible to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #79
126. Ah, that's the new lie, isn't it?
Cough. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #126
171. Got something in your mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #171
173. Even Hillary's people admit shes not ahead in the popular vote
Even if you use the twisted math scenario I've seen so many times on this forum.

Heres a clue, states that have caucuses count just as much as states that have primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #173
174. I don't know what you mean by "Hillary's people"
Hillary is ahead if the votes of Florida and Michigan are included. After the final primaries end June 3rd she will be ahead by any measure. Obama is suffering from buyer's remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #174
192. Where are you getting this math?
The only way shes ahead in popular vote, even with MI/FL included is if you discount the 4 caucus states that just send in delegate totals, not votes. So you are discounting the votes of 4 states in the interest of making you flimsy argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #171
181. LOL
ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #79
190. No, she's not. Your figures are wrong.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #79
191. And the number of people that voted in illegitimate contests...
...from states that broke the DNC rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #67
152. a draw my ass... so that explains why HRC has to beg for donors
millions truly support Obama while HRC is just a power hungry sore loser.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
175. Why?
her candidate is winning the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
125. If they refuse to vote for the Democratic Nominee, if they support the Republican, they're ASSHOLES.
ASSHOLES.

They're not "best kind of Democrats", they're ASSHOLES.

Did I mention they're assholes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #125
182. Takes one to know one
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #57
158. The best kind of Democrats don't actively campaign against the party's nominee.
I'm a woman and a feminist and I don't see ANYTHING Hillary brings to women's issues that Obama does not. Making this about "sexism" after the race is lost is just bitter and petty, and most of all not believable. I find the whole argument that Hillary is the victim of ANYTHING in this race completely baseless. If anything, Hillary has gone after Obama's race and religion to prove her point that she thinks he is "unelectable." Show me where Obama did anything of the kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #158
183. Obama has not brought a damned thing to women's issues
with the exception of unproven rhetoric. Show me anything else he has done for women except what every pol running for Top Job has done, cheap talk. Clinton has worked for health care for women and children, children's advancement/learning programs, Women's reproductive rights (NARAL 100% rating) and will probably continue to do waht she can for those issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
58. Gay baiter
One such case is in Columbus, Ohio. For almost 14 years it had passed without comment that the local Congressman, John Kasich, the powerful chairman of the House Budget Committee, stretches his paycheck by sharing a Virginia town house for the two or three nights a week that Congress is in session. His housemate? His male chief of staff. Last month Cynthia Ruccia, Kasich's Democratic challenger, called for a Justice Department investigation of what she said was "a serious appearance of impropriety" because Kasich, who is divorced, lived with someone whose government salary he controls.

That was the official question. What it unofficially implied was that the two men might be otherwise involved. Though Ruccia denies that she intended to leave that impression, Kasich's office inevitably found itself having to deny that either man is gay. No federal investigation is likely. (To begin with, the Justice Department does not examine "appearances.") As it happens, Ruccia had long been a high-profile supporter of gay rights and Kasich an occasional ally at best. (He voted yes on AIDS funding, no on gay marriage.) But by raising the issue, she stands to benefit from whatever doubt she creates in the minds of voters hostile to gays.

Even Democrats were crying foul. "It was the worst sort of gutter politics and gay baiting," says Bob Fitrakis, Kasich's 1992 Democratic opponent. And the gay community in Kasich's congressional district also sensed an invitation to gay baiting. "It's disappointing to see it from a party that has been the most progressive on the issues," says Phil Martin, president of Stonewall Union, Ohio's largest gay-rights organization, which counts Ruccia as a member.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,985297,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. Ohio's largest gay-rights organization, which counts Ruccia as a member.
Ruccia is a fucked up shitdustbag. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Shaddup. Sit down!
:D

Just wanted to see what that felt like, since apparently it's all the rage with us non-Hillarites.

I'm thinking maybe I'll send Ms Ruccia all the leering articles I can find about Hillary and her aide, see if the hypocrite pops her cork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. You don't like her because she's in a gay rights group?
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:35 PM by OzarkDem
What's wrong with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #68
128. You mean you don't care that she's in a gay rights group and attacked John Kasich as gay?
I guess you Shillbots don't care about being hypocrites as long as you get your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
61. So men aren't told, "Sit down, shut up, and get with the program"?
I beg to differ.

That said, I have NO problems if the Clinton campaign campaigns without bashing our nominee. More power to them - that becomes a positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
63. They have NO RESPECT for the voters who chose differently.
I guess those women are NOT SERIOUS about the issues. Or a woman's right to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
72. This will pass - if allowed to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
76. Hillary Clinton has said she will work her heart for the Dem nominee. Hope they follow her lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
184. She and Obama are working in concert to raise funds for DNC,
also. She is a better Dem than some of her detractors on this sorryassed forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
77. Wow, they sound pretty fierce.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
80. I am a Hillary supporter...
and not all of us are like that. I will vote for whoever our nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #80
185. I am a Clinton supporter but I' m not sure I want to vote for a
dark horse. I want to hear more from Obama, who his backers are, who he is proposing for cabinet positions, more detail of his proposals on issues etc. I take my vote seriously and will write in if he disappoints me, especially who he plans on having close in his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #185
193. I don't think he'll release his cabinet picks before the election
Candidates don't typically do that...it opens up a can of worms and gives the other candidate ammunition to vet and exploit any skeletons in any of the cabinet appointees' closets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
82. You would think Obama has run a nasty campaign against her
And he hasn't done that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
83. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
84. Will their 15 people reach the other 300,000,000 that dont give a shit
what they say because Obama has won this fair and square.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
86. These are those not so nice tactics
women use on their mates, when they don't get their way.

Withhold and threats to withhold, sex, cooked meals and access to the bed. Threats every other weekend, to end the relationship.

Winning and being acknowledged, is seemingly more important than doing what's right.

So, they win enough times and end up alone and lonely, or with mates resigned to staying but getting their needs satisfied elsewhere.

I talk to young women all the time about this. These and similar tactics are petty and detrimental to ANY relationship, business or romantic.

I often debunk the 50/50 relationship rule. It is wrong to just give half and wait until that person meets you there. You aim is to give 100% of yourself all the time.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #86
113. What an unmitigated load of horse-shit!
:rofl:

:rofl:


:rofl:


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #113
145. Obviously, I hit your sore spot? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #113
186. Hey I have met some women like that. Unbelievable, but true.
ugly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
87. Hillary needs to slap these "democrats" down...now!
If she refuses?

hmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
91. Let them join Lieberman and the other assholes supporting the senile McCain
Good riddance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
95. Sooooooooooo....we are supposed to give the Nomination
to Hillary because of the fact she is a woman?

What was the point of having a competition if in the end the person that did not run a successful strategic campaign is given the win because she is a woman?
She and her campaign failed critical junctures:

Didn't plan for what happens after the first Super Tuesday
Ran a poor campaign
Mismanaged her money
Her chosen staff damaged her everyday
She used race baiting to win WV

As a woman, this defeats the purpose of the womens movement, is it just me?

This is beyond selfish......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
97. I won't undermine him, but I won't vote for him either. Nader.
or:

To the convention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #97
109. Well... thanks for nothing.. I'm sure the families with children in Iraq
and families with no health care, and people losing their homes and people suffering from the recession appreciate your vote :eyes:

What? Obama piss in your Cheerio's this morning? Or is it his supporters who insulted you into basically voting for McCain. Is your pride more important than people who are actually suffering and dying under neo-con rule?

Don't kid yourself, you vote for Nader you may as well have voted for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
98. Women: We have done this to ourselves by trying to act vigilant in the faces of men.
Every time we tell a woman to keep a stiff upper lip in the face of serious sexist behavior in the workplace and in politics, we eliminate yet another opportunity to fight it. We set up younger generations of women to suffer the same treatment, and instead of facing this stuff head on, we wrongly tell fellow women to turn the other cheek.

Women: Men aren't going to change when we try to act like them by trying to appear unflinchingly "tough." Looking the other way is NEITHER strength NOR female empowerment. All this will do is make sure that the behavior is ready for yet another woman who unfortunately comes by way of the misogynist. If we continue to do this, I guarantee, NOTHING WILL CHANGE.

These women are standing up against what they feel has been a Democratic Party that has looked the other way to very blatant displays of sexist behavior. I don't blame them, in fact, good for them for doing what so many women refuse to do under the false pretense of "not playing the victim."

For every action is an opposite and equal reaction. This is but one. There will be more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. You are so right...
this has nothing to do with loyalty to Hillary. The Obama supporters refuse to get it so I've quit trying to explain it. They don't want to get it, they just want to try to manipulate and coerce us to their way of thinking.

What they don't realize is this isn't our first rodeo and probably won't be our last one either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #101
104. I wish this was not happening during the heat of a campaign so more would feel comfortable accepting
the obvious. If Clinton were running for a company position - say a CEO - and she faced similar treatment through corporate emails and signs posted on employees' cubes, several would be fired. The situation would be public, and there would be a public outcry.

As it stands, several use their political disagreement/dislike of Clinton as a reason to dismiss blatant displays of sexism. How different this would be if they didn't have such an emotional, vested interest in seeing her opponent win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #98
111.  Who has said anything at all about a stiff upper lip?
And, do you feel comfortable sending other women out on a fool's errand? They are clearly picking on the wrong target. What a waste.

Reactivity is not a movement builder. Nor is attempting to change one gender in hopes the whole culture will change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. The attitudes of one race changed after transcending racist thought.
Why can't it be so for men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #114
116. When was racist thought transcended? I must have missed that.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:39 PM by sfexpat2000
And, the dynamics of the two situations share some features but aren't the same.

There's also that old saw: if you want something done, you have to do it yourself. Which pretty much rules out expecting other people to change the world for you.

Edit: Writer, I'm sorry if I sound cranky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. When have men transcended sexist thought?
These are two sides of the same coin: a need to fight against discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. Discrimination is the umbrella but you are looking at two different situations.
People of color didn't get closer to social justice by changing white people. They fought to organize, to enlist allies and to change the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #118
122. Whites marched with African-Americans during the civil rights movement.
And it took white men in the courts (along with Thurgood Marshall) to establish the laws that overturned institutionalized segragation. That, along with the activism of MLK and others, brought about civil rights.

It took EVERYONE, and it will take EVERYONE to combat sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #122
129. Um, de-segregation has been a huge failure. And, not everyone
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:11 AM by sfexpat2000
was enlisted. Allies of all backgrounds were and politicians who could sense a shift made changes in their positions, like LBJ.

But at no point was EVERYONE working this problem. That's simply not true.

And while a certain segment of the feminist community seeks to change MEN, nothing much will change. First, the project cedes too much power to men and second, unless you are a brain surgeon, you can't force other people to change their thinking. Third, unless you're willing to be the change you want, you're spinning your wheels. Nothing keeps a conflict going as well as insisting that it's someone else's fault.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #129
130. First, let's strike a difference between desegregation and civil rights.
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:30 AM by Writer
As civil rights is represented by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution that calls for "equal protection under the law" which not only accompanied the 13th Amendment that abolished slavery, it also served as the legal precedent for Brown v. Board of Education. It's also the same amendment used to support the Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973.

Desegregation has failed predominately because of the economic barriers still in place for many African-Americans. Cross-cutting cleavages of both racial and economic injustice have created a high barrier for poor African-Americans in this nation. Furthermore, the reduction of manufacturing jobs in urban centers have exacerbated the problem.

However we're discussing discrimination against WOMEN and sexist behavior. And according the the 14th Amendment we should all be treated equally under the law. Both African-Americans AND women. Women should not have to face sexist behavior when they go to work, as African-Americans shouldn't face racist behavior, nor should homosexuals face discrimination against their sexual-orientation. We're all protected under the same amendment, and we all deserve an equal hearing when we believe our constitutional rights have been violated.

While it wasn't institutionalized, both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have faced anti-constitutional discrimination while they have been campaigning. Unfortunately racist, sexist, and homophobic speech are legal according to the First Amendment (hate speech) despite the fact that such speech is used to undermine both candidates as they campaign.

However, for many, hate speech for one carries more weight than hate speech for another. And that's where we've erred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #130
132. So, now you've abandoned the (failed) populist argument
for the law. That's fine but it's also opposite to your earlier claims which equated the civil rights movement for people of color to the women's movement. And then, you jumble the First Amendment with hate speech.

No wonder you folks are upset all the time.

The fact of the matter is that Hillary Clinton has been given special treatment because she is Bill Clinton's wife and because as his wife, she demanded that treatment -- she still is demanding it. Her own abilities and strengths were more or less strangled in the cradle over the political pull she could siphon off from him. That was her decision and I think it was a stupid one because she is an able person. But, that wasn't my call to make -- it was hers. That it didn't work is unfortunate but that strategy isn't one I'd ever recommend to my daughter when she's trying to show that she is a leader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #98
153. these women are fucking fools to
support a candidate JUST because she's a woman.

Hillary doesn't give a shit about anyone but Hillary.
Hillary doesn't give a shit about anything but power.

Hillary is NOT a victim of anything but her own hubris.
But the fools who support her in this "bite your nose to spite your face" manner will be when McCain wins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbrenna Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
103. I do not understand how
a woman could vote for John McCain knowing he will put judges on the supreme court who will overturn Roe V Wade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #103
107. Not just overturn Roe, but Griswold as well, the privacy decision
Overturning Griswold, as Scalia wants to do, would criminalize certain sex acts among consenting adults even married couples (oral sex).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. And the birth control pill too
I think enough people understand the precipice we're on now in judicial appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbrenna Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #107
170. Yes-you are correct.
I had not considered that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
108. nah! I doubt it once they start hearing Bush jr. (McCain) running his mouth off about
only 5 more years or 100 hundred years left in Iraq (for openers) talk about shooting yourself in the foot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
112. Hell, the HRC boosters here brag about doing just that everyday - look at all the gushing love
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and the rest of the stars of right-wing Hate Radio get from the HRC boosters here. They are licking their chops at the prospect of supporting McCain now that their Queen's coronation has been derailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
115. Proof positive they are Republicans posing as Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
119. uh, haven't quite a few O supporters here threated not to vote for hill? oh, nevermind....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #119
124. yes, they have, and i have two words for them:
'fucking morons.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #119
127. She gets the nomination, I will absolutely vote for her. I've always said I'd support the nominee.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:52 PM by impeachdubya
And I've always said that anyone who won't is an ASSHOLE.

There's way too much at stake this year for this sort of whiny, petulant, Waaaaaah-I-didn't-get-my-way bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #119
155. that is the defense of a child...
Edited on Fri May-16-08 07:21 AM by Teaser
"But mommy, they're doing it too."


It's one thing to point out an inequity. But it is not a defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #155
169. it was not a defense. i was just pointing it out. i could give you a defense, but i'm not going to
bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
131. Does this surprise anyone????
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:42 AM by Beacool
I kept telling you people that you bashed Hillary at your own peril, but in your arrogance you didn't want to hear it. Last night my phone was ringing off the hook with people calling me to say that they would not vote for Obama, and one going as far as saying that he would vote for McCain.

Why? Edwards's last minute endorsement and the booing by the crowd. People are fed up.

The party leaders are living in an alternate world if they think that they can keep trashing Hillary and there won't be a backlash by the 49% of Democrats who voted for her. The comments by Kennedy, Pelosi and some others have only stoked the fire.

Everyone knows that this will probably be done by June 3. So, what's the rush? Why try to humiliate Hillary and kick her in the teeth? The more she's forcibly pushed out, the more many of us will dig our heels and refuse to vote for the other guy.

You want party unity? Start by treating Hillary and her supporters with respect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
133. Anything from politico is suspect. It makes no sense that those who supported
Clinton would not support Obama if he was the nominee

Why would they have supported Clinton if they didn't believe in choice and womens rights?

Both Obama and Clinton believe in womens rights, mccain doesn't

It is as simple as the supreme court

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
144. This is exactly why parties with primaries this long almost always lose, it's a SERIOUS problem
This is a serious problem if they'll be campaigning for McCain and working against Obama in the general election.

It's definitely really stupid and self destructive to feminism what they're doing, I think unfortunately the only way that Obama can effectively fight this group is if he can get Hillary to privately meet with them and convince them to support Obama because of how horrible McCain will be for women's rights compared to Obama, or get Hillary to campaign against them and praise Obama for being great for women's rights.

What the group is doing is like a man owing you $100,000 dollars, and saying "well listen, I'm only going to be able to pay you back $50,000, I'm not going to be able to raise the other half". And then you saying "no, I'm getting all of my $100,000 from you, and if you won't give it I'll go go court and sue, no matter the cost". And then you sue the guy and win, but the guy spent his $50,000 on a lawyer to defend him from your lawsuit and he's bankrupt then, while you yourself just lost another $50,000 dollars paying for your own lawyer. Basically what I'm saying with this example is it's best to accept the second best thing you can get, rather then going "screw this, I want the #1 best option or nothing, I'll screw you over for not giving me the #1 option even if it'll screw myself over in the process".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
151. Why hasn't Hillary denounced and rejected those supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #151
194. 2012, baby. 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
154. Guess what, "sit down and shut up" comes at the end of a primary when your candidate doesn't win
This isn't a new phenomenon when the end of a political primary season comes along, and it's not a thing invented by Obama's campaign.

It seems a lot of her supporters want and expect her to run a Lieberman-style "independent" campaign at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
157. One of the two rock stars they put up on a pedestal has fallen.
If Edwards or Biden or a number of other candidates in this race were given the kind of treatment these two were there might have been more than the two man race the media shoved down our throats. Stop your damn whining and get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
163. They didn't provide any legitimate examples of sexism against Hillary.
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:50 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
They merely pointed out some calls for Hillary to get out of the race, yet none of those calls came from Obama himself, who they want to take it out on.

And apparently, they don't understand that whoever has the most delegates *wins.* It doesn't matter what your gender or race is.

Besides, Hillary had every conceivable advantage otherwise going into this race, yet lost them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
166. the democratic party is not always right, especially in this election
this old vote the party line if one's candidate loses is BS. Why would anyone that knows if obama is the nominee he will be the weaker of the two and why would folks give their support to him when folks know he is not ready. Do the dems wanna win or make a statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
167. These people anger me even more than the right wing because they should know better!
Edited on Sat May-17-08 03:12 AM by Pushed To The Left
They are willing to have 4 more years of Bush policies and a right-wing Supreme Court over a stupid, petty and childish primary grudge. They care more about pulling a stunt than they do about abortion rights, gay rights, the war, etc.

If more lives and civil rights are lost in the next few years due to right wing policies, these people are just as much to blame as the right wing voters. In fact, in some ways they are worse; at least the right wing voters actually stand for something, as loathsome as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
172. That's because
McCain is such a great candidate.

Some people (not all!) do not care about what happens if McCain is elected. The religious kookiness. The cabinet appointees. SCOTUS.

It is a cult.

When blind devotion is the guiding light than you have

a

cult.

I will vote for the Democrat nominee.

I support Obama but if by some wild chance Hillary is the person on my ballot, you bet your ass I will vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
177. Right-Wing Stooges
"Useful Idiots," as Rush likes to call them.

every one of them - no matter how good their intentions may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
189. I'd love to hand a bloody coat hanger to every single last one of them
If they want to make the Repigs successful in their never-ending wars and want to help overturn Roe V. Wade, then they get the bloody coat hanger warning.

If they continue, then they are not Democrats. They are in the way.

I would venture to guess that these people are all talk and no action anyway...and are in small numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
195. So.. it's the "If my candidate doesn't win" I'm going to Cry attitude, eh?
Great. This was bound to happen anyway.. if Obama lost - then surely there would have been just as many on his "team" that would have decried racism instead of sexism.

It's a lose-lose for the Dem's. The irony of course is that the women throwing this fit are only going to help McCain win - which in turn will get a few more conservative SCOTUS nom's that will then over-turn Roe v Wade, and those 60 year old women can then sit back and watch thier daughters & grand daughters feel the ramifications that they helped obtain. But, no one said that Hillary's supporters were the brightest in the bunch.. just the most hard headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC