Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It looks like race played a far bigger part in this primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:51 AM
Original message
It looks like race played a far bigger part in this primary
than any percieved sexism, at least according to this article


"exit poll results from several states, including California, Arizona, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana, all of which indicate that the margin of Clinton's victories in all of these was either equal to or smaller than the numbers of white voters who admitted that race was relevant to their vote, and then cast their votes for Clinton. In California, for example, Clinton beat Obama by 416,000 votes, but based on the percentages from the exit polls, there were 442,000 for whom race was important to their decision and who voted for Clinton. In Indiana, Clinton's margin of victory was only 19,000, but based on the exit poll there, nearly 100,000 whites voted for Hillary, because of race. In Ohio, Clinton won by 220,000 votes, but based on the exit polls, there were 246,000 whites who voted for Clinton at least in part for reasons of race."

"In other words, but for the votes of whites who were willing to admit that their votes were at least in part cast for racist reasons, she may well have lost all of those races, and the nomination battle would have been over far sooner. There is simply no way to interpret the vote of a white person who says "race matters to my vote" and then votes against the black candidate, other than as an act of racism, just as there is no way to interpret the vote of a man who says "gender matters to my vote" and then votes against the woman, other than as an act of sexism. When you consider the likelihood that far more whites voted against Obama for racial reasons than would be willing to admit it--a proposition bolstered by decades of research indicating that whites typically downplay their racial biases to pollsters--the relative importance of racism compared to sexism in this race becomes readily apparent"

http://counterpunch.org/wise05172008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. That kind of puts to rest Clinton supporters claiming race has nothing
to do with anything, that Obama supporters are the racist ones. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah but you know someone is going come back
that Obama black voters are racist? That their calling card
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ask them to explain how Hillary lost her 60% support over Obama among blacks.
going into Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Pat Buchanan is doing his best...
Not surprising is it? Reverend Wright 24/7 for 3 weeks straight. All race all the time. It's getting old isn't it? Well, maybe not. I guess for some pimping racism never gets old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. people just aren't as aware of sexism..
People don't see reality. We see small parts of the whole, and our perceptions can be altered or formed by a thousand million different things. Racism was an issue in peoples minds, but we had falsely believed that sexism was on the decline. The vile treatment of Hillary Clinton this past year has shown otherwise, and it's disappointing to me that so many DUers have been willing and eager participants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. So are you saying the sexism in this primary
was stronger than the racism against Obama. and at least according to this article those voters where gender mattered voted overwhelmingly for Clinton and where race mattered again voted overwhelmingly for Clinton, so where is this invisible sexism that is working against Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. First, the sexism was not invisible..
Many members of the media, and the Democratic party felt entitled to treat her with a level of disdain and disrespect that would not have been socially acceptable had she been male. People just haven't been made aware of sexism in action lately, so most didn't recognize it for what it was. I have no idea what motivated voters to vote for either candidate. I'm just saying that because people are less aware of sexism right now, many didn't realize that their opinion of Hillary was being influenced by a prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. please give me examples of this sexism
because I don't remember being on the news cycle 24/7 like Rev. Wright, did you forget about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. if sexism was obvious it wouldn't be tolerated
it's subtle, which makes it subjective. But that doesn't mean it isn't very real. Years from now my guess is historians will cite the political cartoons that make Hillary look a little worse than her male counterparts, the facial expressions on media people doing commentary, or the unneccessary add on criticisms from people like Ted Kennedy.

Read through any Hillary/Obama thread on DU and pretend one of our male condidates had done the exact same 'evil' thing that Hillary had done in that instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. wait because sexism is not "obvious"
maybe its not obvious because its not there as much as you think it is in this race. What we have seen and has been obvious in this race is overt racism, i.e Ohio, Penn, WV

and as for cartoons they all look "worse" shit they make Bush look like a monkey I don't mind and how about that Georgia guy selling Curious George t-shirts with Obama 2008 on it.

Thank God most Americans aren't bigots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. Rev. Wright's words were discussed, not his ethnicity .
NOBODY is going to come right out and attack HRC for something over which she has no control: her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Maybe she earned that 'vile' treatment by her actions and it had
nothing to do with her gender. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. if Hillary had been male, would her actions have been 'vile'
or would they have been politics as usual? Think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It wouldn't have mattered. She lost me when praising the rethug
candidate while dissing her Democratic competition. That isn't kosher, I don't care what sex you are.
She's behaved abominably imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. So I guess I can't stand Bill's actions because of sexism right?
What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Aligning with McCain ... "Not a Muslim as far as I know; I'll take him at his word."
Vile.

Not to mention IWR vote ... Vile. That goes for men who voted for it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higher Standard Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Agreed, to an extent
Certainly, there has been sexism present, but I also believe that, just as there have been those who were quick to point out racism where it wasn't necessarily present, there have been quite a few who have been willing to accuse others of sexism where it has not necessarily been there. A lot of it is subjective. People's views on both racism and sexism have been formed by their experiences, which are different for everyone. Unfortunately, rather than questioning and discussing, there has been far too much labeling. And it's when people start getting hit with labels that they decide to hit back and we start to lose all civility. It would have been a very different race if people had been a little more willing to talk to each other and a little less eager to start calling each other names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. welcome to DU, and I agree with your post..
I think it is an issue that deserves to be explored though. As Democrats, we should be the first to call ourselves out if we've slipped into discriminating behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. No way is sexism a greater problem than racism, I am a black female...
And my gender has never been a "negative" issue in my life. but when I lived in Kentucky for 2 years, people made sure to point out I was black. Once someone trued to run me off the road, I was walking. As they sped past me they scream "beat it N*gger" Yeah my being a lady wasn't the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
43. I think racism is worse in every day life
I think sexism is worse in the workplace. The same men who would use racial epithets and not have anything to do with their black male coworkers out of the office/jobsite are still more likely to accept them as supervisors than females of any color. On the other hand, as a white female I don't have to worry about Driving While Black, either.

I'm not aware of any studies which bear my opinion out, it's just my belief based on personal observation, reading and discussions of that topic. I'd love to see any studies on that comparison, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well dah, on blogs with repukeilcan posters
I see "if Obama gets in then affirmative action will run rampant over whites seeking jobs" posts. The good old repukelican lie, job loss is because blacks get jobs better qualified whites should have got thus killing the white middle class. Plays well in hard hit economy areas such as michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. it's a fact that Hillary's margin of victory in several states was racist whites
Many were actually Republicans trying to harm the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. delete
Edited on Sat May-17-08 11:30 AM by Crisco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. If race played this much of a part in the Dem primary, the GE will be a lot worse.
Hold onto your hats. The Republicans don't have the same constraints as any of the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course they didn't even ask about sexism
or for that matter ask black voters to what degree races was involved in their votes. Taking data from one side to argue a point is the dishonesty that Counterpunch routinely engages in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. quit crying if you read the article
it states she didn't lose because of sexism.

get it through your head the only reason this race was as close as it was, was due to white racism and to some extent latino racism (Did you see that Latino Clinton supporter in Texas who wouldn't support Obama because he was black)
look at my earlier post I knew it was a matter of time a Hill supporter would bring up blacks voted obama whimpering, thanks for making my prophesy come true

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. if you don't bother asking voters about sexism
shock of shocks you don't find any evidence of it. Funny how that works. There was a gender disparity that was massive in many states Obama won. Under the standards you have been using that means sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Polls have asked people
did you vote on gender or race, overwhelmingly those voters chose Clinton, this is also touched on in this article.
face it Hillary got the support of the sexist and racist voting for her, just because she is women it is still sexist isn't it. And if Blacks voted for Obama because he's black I guess you can say that's racist but Hillary still wins the divise card because there are more women than blacks in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. funny how he supplies no numbers whatsoever for those polls
when he numbers for the others are so precise. Makes one wonder. Of course, totally left out of the equation are those votes gained for Obama by blacks who used races as a reason to decide for him. Even if one doesn't consider it racism (and I don't) it is relevent to whether racism hurt Obama more than sexism hurt Hillary. The article is also totally wrong about the number of states in which Hillary carried the white male vote. She lost it in many more than a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. where is your link on it
here some stuff from me to you

If Hillary doesn't get the nomination, this man said, he'd not only vote for but work for McCain, "and I hate McCain."

"Why not Obama?"

"He's too inexperienced."

"And why else?" a woman down the bar asked.

"Because he's black."

"Thank you!" she replied.

More talk, a little heat, and the man exclaimed, "I'm not going to vote for the nigger!"

Some in the bar seemed tensed; they were "undecided." The man goaded them; that's not what they had discussed the other day. He laughed. Another man from across the bar said he knew whom he wasn't voting for: "the nigger."

The first man continued to proclaim, "I love Hillary." He and a friend said she probably should take the VP spot if it were offered; even if Obama gets the nomination, "he's not going to make it." Later he apologized for saying "nigger"; "I'm not a racist."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/wypijewski/2

It's also interesting to note that in Ohio, 1-in-5 Democratic voters said race was an important factor in making their decision. In that group, 8-in-10 voted for Hillary Clinton.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/04/730736.aspx

One-fifth of white Ohio voters said race was an important issue to their vote, and those who did voted eight in 10 for Clinton. That compares with the one in five Democrats in Ohio who said gender was important, and they voted six in 10 for Clinton.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/05/economy_is_driving_issue_for_democrats_polls_show/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. when only whites are asked
you will get only one side of the equation. I don't know why you are asking for a link. I quoted your article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. you know since both of us as it goes for DU
are being rather civil, lets just agree to disagree

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. sorry I forgot I mentioned the states
Every caucus state save Nevada, Iowa, New Mexico, and the states of Georgia and South Carolina are all places where she lost the white male vote to Obama. I think she also lost it in New Hampshire.

Here is the link to NH

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#NHDEM

You can find the rest at that site.

Given the overwhelmingly white nature of that electorate we know that a 6% loss among males necessitates a loss among white males.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. There is a big difference between racial demographics and racism ...think!
The media - CNN and the rest - demographically break down the votes for statistical purposes and NOT to flag the racism of the voters.

Blacks turned out for Obama out of pride and hope that one of them will achieve the highest office on the planet. What's wrong with that?

In 1960 I voted for John Kennedy because he was Catholic. Does that make me a religious bigot?

In these primaries I voted for Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. I am a guy. Does that make me sexist?

If Obama wins the nomination I will vote for him because I want to share in the historical dramatics involving the election to the Presidency of the first black American.

What does that make me? Oh, I think I am white. I am checking my mitochondrial DNA. I may have descended from that cute black lady from East Africa - the Real Eve.......

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0373595/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. Of course it did. And the Clintoons are the ones who made race the issue.
Women against blacks. Latinos against blacks. Jews against blacks. Then, poor people against blacks. It was her deliberate strategy to divide and conquer because she couldn't win on her own merits. She was a very flawed candidate with a lot of baggage so she divided the Democratic caucas for her own gain. What a disgrace she is as a woman, a senator and a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. "Hillary Clinton Doesn't Care About Black People"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. They don't! Fuck the Clintons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yeah. Tucker Really Called That One, Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. We knew all along Race would be a factor and will be a factor
in the GE.

While I understand the African American Pride in supporting Obama,
one has to realize there will be a reaction on the other side. Deeing
all blacks stick together makes some whites react on the other side.
This too is only one factor.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. The Only Assumption That Can Be Made From Those Figures
Edited on Sat May-17-08 11:28 AM by Crisco
In California, for example, is that twice as many of the people who admitted race was a factor in their decision voted for Clinton, over people who admitted race was a factor and voted for Obama.


The exit polls don't give us the breakdowns, by race, of people who said race mattered. Not that I've seen, anyway.

On edit -

Do you even look at the figures in the states where Obama won, where such data exists?

In Georgia, where Obama won, 27% of voters - over 1/4 - stated that race was a factor. 216k votes. Of those, 155k (72%) went to Obama.

In CT, 15% of voters said race was important. Of those, there was a 56% / 41% split FOR Obama.

In Delaware, where Obama won, of the 18% who said race was important, 59% went to Obama.

While it can certainly be said there were people voting against Obama because he's black, it can equally be said there are people who are voting for him for that same reason and it, too, is a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. The white folks who won't vote for Obama because he is black
Are dead wrong -- he's not "black"

Sen Obama is biracial, and I think this little detail gets buried in the rhetoric.

His mother was a white American. These folks could even be related to her family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. White folks get to decide who's black. And Obama makes the cut.
It's not the way it should be, of course, but it's the way it is. At the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. I keep asking where those SC ,GA, NC, etc..Polls are on the 99%...
Edited on Sat May-17-08 04:08 PM by indimuse
AA...where's the poll...OH, That's right....WE don't NEED ONE!paleeeze!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
45. How about 91% of AA voting for Obama????????
Of course, that has nothing to do with his race. No, no siree. It's only white people who are perceived as racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC