Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

News Media 'Political Death Watch' On Hillary Clinton Begins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:11 PM
Original message
News Media 'Political Death Watch' On Hillary Clinton Begins
Edited on Sat May-17-08 12:13 PM by oldpol
News Media Political Death Watch On Clinton Campaign Begins (UPDATED)
May 17th, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Campaigns like people go through life phases, and nothing can be more distressing to a candidate and his/her supporters as when journalists start reporting a political death rattle. That now seems to be the stage of the campaign of Senator Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
You can hear the characterizations in the reports of TV news journalists and read references to it in some news reports. MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell reported that Senator Clinton knows the race is over.

First, she won the West Virginia primary by a whopping majority even bigger than the whopping majority by which many expected her to win. Then the agony started. Former rival John Edwards endorsed Obama, wiping follow up stories on her win from the news and talking-head cycles. Then President Bush and John McCain suggested Obama wants to appease terrorists…indicating they considered Clinton out of the picture and giving Obama an opening he used to launch a political rebuttal-offensive.
The Times details what other reporters have noted this week: a perceptible change in the Clinton campaign as it realizes — despite the spin to friendly bloggers on blogger conference calls (this site has yet to be invited to a conference call from any major candidate because we have people with differing views who write on it) — the numbers don’t add up:
Famous for her 16-hour days, her unflagging energy and her willingness to shout into a microphone until her voice gives out, Mrs. Clinton finds herself encountering long odds and a dwindling bank account. (David Letterman recently joked that with her campaign $21 million in debt, she is at “the world’s most expensive fantasy camp.”) And the new tone is palpable.
It has always been difficult for Mrs. Clinton to compete against an opponent who once received thunderous applause for blowing his nose. But as Mr. Obama seized nearly every headline in the last several days, Mrs. Clinton appeared zapped of her usual enthusiasm.
The small crowd she attracted in rural South Dakota on Thursday was quiet and polite, with none of the exuberance that usually greets Mrs. Clinton at her campaign stops. (A campaign aide suggested it could have been due to the cultural mores of South Dakotans.)
This will be a week that some contend will the last hurrah for Clinton, while others insist it won’t.
New polls indicate Clinton could win Tuesday’s Kentucky primary by a landslide and could be making big inroads in Oregon. Will she embarrass Obama again and make superdelegates think twice?
The answers are yes…and apparently no.
You can tell Clinton is having trouble with superdelegates because of the arguments she’s using.
In the call to Clinton-friendly bloggers, she argued the map and not the math was important. She also talked about the terrible vitriol aimed at bloggers who support her, particularly women bloggers. Read James Joyner HERE. (However, if you read blogs passionately written by Clinton supporters you will find they were often as angry and slashing in tone in their posts about blogs passionately written by Obama supporters. Vitriol is not been limited to one candidate– or one sex’s writers. Blogosophere vitriol is aimed at writers who don’t agree with another writer.)
Why is Clinton’s campaign continuing? The list of possibilities, probabilities and facts:
–If it continues she could raise money to help pay off her debt.
–They believe deeply that voters in remaining states should have the right to cast their votes in the primary race.
–The Clintons do reportedly believe Obama is headed for defeat (but it can be argued they see things through the prism of 1990s conventional wisdom assumptions, which may not apply in 2008).
–To be there if some new blockbuster revelation about Obama or someone close to him comes out and destroys him. There are rumors already swirling around about that. (If it turned out the Clintons were behind negative material surfacing or even widely suspected, Clinton would not win the general election due to Obama supporters’ ire).
–Because anything at all is possible until the nomination votes are counted. Former Governor Mike Huckabee even said the unmentionable when he made a joke that flopped badly about Obama being shot. (Video here).
–(Critics theory) To weaken Obama so she can pick up the Democratic party nomination pieces in 2012.
–(Supporters’ theory) To go out on a high note by deep-sixing the divisive politics epitomized by her husband Bill Clinton’s most publicized and controversial campaign appearances and turning the focus more on McCain.
Campaigns go through journalistic cycles: the candidate rises; the candidate becomes the front-runner; the front-runner stumbles; the front runner is no longer the front-runner; the front-runner makes a comeback. Then it’s whether the front runner wins or eventually fails.
But campaigns also go through life cycles.
And it’s clear that the mainstream news media — and much of the new media — increasingly believe that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is now on life support.
UPDATE: Clinton is now going after the news media, The Politico reports — partially to generate a backlash against the news media so she’ll get votes:
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is increasingly aiming its punches not at her front-running opponent Barack Obama, but at the media.
On the campaign trail, in a new ad and in her meetings with donors and superdelegates, she blasts the D.C. punditocracy for counting her out and urges anyone who’ll listen to ignore the hardening storyline that places Obama as the Democratic presidential nominee.
The goal is two-fold. Clinton, a New York senator, wants to staunch the flow of uncommitted superdelegates to Obama, an Illinois senator, by convincing them she can still win the nomination. She also wants to generate a protest vote in the four states that have yet to hold primaries, as well as in Puerto Rico.
The Clinton camp believes a media backlash drove up turnout among her supporters in West Virginia, which last week delivered a landslide 67 percent to 26 percent victory for her. http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/democratic-party/19693/news-media-political-death-watch-on-clinton-campaign-begins/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reminds me of the Poor Hillary...Death By Condensation thing that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Could you possibly edit your OP to make it easier on the eyes?
Paragraph breaks are a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. and they are free
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL
Nice!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I will be surprised if most media networks do not decare Obama the presumptive nominee by the 21st
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i think that's why O will declare victory in Iowa on the 20th
what a night that will be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't think he is going to declare victory.
He will just say he has the majority of the delegates and that he is returning to where it all started to say hi.

I doubt he is going to directly say VICTORY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. would this change if Hillary concedes
if Andrea Mitchell is correct...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Eyes.Are.Bleeding. Run.On.Paragraphs.Killing.Me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes the OP needs to be cleaned up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Could we get the OP cleaned up please? Hard on the Eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. OK.. here's the part I don't get....
<snip>
To be there if some new blockbuster revelation about Obama or someone close to him comes out and destroys him. There are rumors already swirling around about that.
<snip>

If there were some huge revelation out there... as swirling rumors apparently attest... wouldn't it have come out by now? If the Clinton camp had something that would destroy his candidacy they would most assuredly have come out with it weeks ago at the latest. And if it is someone else who "has the goods" on Obama, and the Clinton camp knows about it, wouldn't they have forced the issue by now?

I just don't get how this works for her... it just doesn't make sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It doesn't make sense to you because it doesn't make sense at all.
At this point, he would have had to murder his mother or eat one of his kids in a public place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. or "turn over a new page"
republican style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Right -- he could go into seclusion with Pat Robertson for a weekend
and get some "spiritual guidance". lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. swirling rumours-close family
hopefully its not true and just Hillary desperation tatics http://digg.com/politics/Repubs_to_release_tape_of_Michelle_Obama_Whitey_Speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Rumors are what the Republicans are all about. Dont worry about their crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC