Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Quiet About Own Radical Ties-Faulting of Obama Called Hypocritical

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:59 AM
Original message
Clinton Quiet About Own Radical Ties-Faulting of Obama Called Hypocritical
Clinton Quiet About Own Radical Ties-Faulting of Obama Called Hypocritical

By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 19, 2008; Page A04


When Hillary Rodham Clinton questioned rival Barack Obama's ties to 1960s radicals, her comments baffled two retired Bay Area lawyers who knew Clinton in the summer of 1971 when she worked as an intern at a left-wing law firm in Oakland, Calif., that defended communists and Black Panthers.

"She's a hypocrite," Doris B. Walker, 89, who was a member of the American Communist Party, said in an interview last week. "She had to know who we were and what kinds of cases we were handling. We had a very left-wing reputation, including civil rights, constitutional law, racist problems."

Malcolm Burnstein, 74, a partner at the firm who worked closely with Clinton during her internship, said he was traveling in Pennsylvania in April when Clinton attacked Obama for his past interactions with William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, members of Students for a Democratic Society who went on to found the bomb-making Weather Underground.

"Given her background, it was quite hypocritical," Burnstein said. "I almost called the Philadelphia Inquirer. I saw what she and her campaign were saying about Ayers and I thought, 'Well, if you're going to talk about that totally bit of irrelevant nonsense, I'll talk about your career with us.' "

In her campaign for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, Clinton has said little about her experiences in the tumultuous late 1960s and early 1970s, including her involvement with student protests and her brief internship at the law firm, Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein. She has said she worked on a child custody case, although former partners recall her likely involvement in conscientious objector cases and a legal challenge to a university loyalty oath.

But her decision to target Obama's radical connections has spurred criticism from some former protest movement leaders who say she has opened her own associations to scrutiny.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/18/AR2008051802101.html?nav=rss_politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. My,my,my
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. civil rights, constitutional law, racist problems for Hill - bombs for Obama - yep - equal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. When did Obama bomb anyone?
Do tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. hey, pal, what do you think those people at that firm were defending?
they were defending the same kinds of radicals. check your history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Bullshit.
And you KNOW it's bullshit.

You know fucking well that Ayers was NEVER charged nor convicted of ANYTHING. And Obama was in 3rd grade in Hawaii when Ayers' group was playing radical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. i think this is stupid, which is why I said she should not run this crap against Obama
because she had perhaps a great connection in Oakland.

but it is stupid, it's a stupid way to pick a candidate, based on this type of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Yes, it is stupid and harmful
Clinton should never have started spreading this McCarthyite horse shit in February. It had to come around on her sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. by her standard she should not be running due to faulty associations
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Are we surprised? Yet another example of classic narcissistic behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfaprog Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ouch
THAT one's gonna leave a mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Primary is over. We can leave Hillary alone now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. oh come on, you don't get to choose your law firm!
but you can choose your...wait a minute...:wtf:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Truly, who cares at this point. Its over. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. The WaPo, for one, it seems. Could be a lesson in
being careful of what is said in the future, because people have skeletons (hear that, McCain?) they may not want dug up.
I'm glad this came up myself, though it's weeks too late/after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't care about this. It's over.
This only antagonizes Hillary supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. We do need to be open about this
Because Clinton may run again in four years if Obama loses, in which case all this will be trotted out again.

You shouldn't try to win a primary in our party by portraying your opponent as a left-wing nutjob based on guilt by association. The Clintons should retire to private life, which has been highly renumerative for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Clinton Quiet About Own Radical Ties
The folly of Clinton's accusations of Obama's 'guilt by association' with radicals of the 1960's is brutally apparent in this latest Washington Post piece.




Clinton Quiet About Own Radical Ties

By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 19, 2008; A04


.....

But her decision to target Obama's radical connections has spurred criticism from some former protest movement leaders who say she has opened her own associations to scrutiny.
"The very things she's accusing Barack of could be said of her with much greater evidence," said Tom Hayden, a leading anti-Vietnam War activist, author and self-described friend of the Clintons.
Robert Reich, who went to Yale Law School with Hillary Rodham and Bill Clinton and later served in the Clinton administration, called Hillary Clinton's attack on Obama "absurd," adding: "That carries guilt by association to a new level of absurdity. Where does guilt by association stop? I mean, she was a partner of Jim McDougal in the 1980s, for crying out loud." Reich is now an Obama supporter.

In response to the assertion that Clinton is a hypocrite for calling out Obama's ties to Ayers, campaign spokesman Philippe Reines said: "The comparison is patently absurd." The campaign played down her friendship with a noted student protest leader and defended her work with the Oakland firm. "At the time she worked there, the firm was primarily at the forefront of civil rights advocacy cases, which was a good fit with Senator Clinton's long-standing interest in civil rights and constitutional law," Reines said.

Clinton's associations date to her years as a student leader at Wellesley from 1965 to 1969. It was the height of student opposition to the Vietnam War, and Carl Oglesby, the president of Students for a Democratic Society, came to campus to speak.
"I gave a talk at Wellesley, where she was a student," Oglesby said in a telephone interview from Amherst, Mass., where he is recovering from a stroke. "I can't say that I was a close friend of hers. It was more of a passing acquaintance. I liked her. I think of her as a good guy. I think she has a good heart and a solid mind. And I support her in the current primary."
Oglesby had been close to Ayers and Dohrn, but the couple split with the more moderate SDS factions to form the Weather Underground, which engaged in a bombing campaign to try to stop the Vietnam War. The FBI monitored Oglesby throughout the period.

The Clinton campaign suggested last week that she did not meet Oglesby until the 1990s, long after his activist years. But in recent interviews, Oglesby has made clear that she stood out in his memory as he traveled across the country speaking at rallies.

.....

Oglesby now talks warmly about Clinton. In an interview with Reason magazine, he called their association "a friendship, a comradeship, within the context of the movement. She and I, for a while, were warm with each other. She and I were semi-close."
But Oglesby said he has not contacted Clinton because he is afraid that he could harm her candidacy.
"A friend of mine mentioned me to her not long ago, and according to him she got a case of the shakes. I think it was because she could imagine if any of her considerable enemies on the right wanted to do her in, they would be happy to discover a relationship between her and me," he told the magazine.

.....





Has she given any thought whatsoever to how she is damaging herself and dismantling the credibility of her Senate career? It is a truly sad spectacle.



A bit more from the Post:



Clinton interned at Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein while attending Yale Law School. The firm defended the Black Panthers, including Angela Davis, and Clinton had been editor of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action, which included articles about Black Panther leader Bobby Seale's murder trial in New Haven, Conn.

.....

In her autobiography, "Living History," Clinton details little of the firm's background. She wrote that she "spent most of my time working for Mal Burnstein researching, writing legal motions and briefs for a child custody case."
But members of the firm have different recollections. Burnstein recalled her working on a case involving Stanford University students who refused to sign an oath attesting that they had never been communists.
Walker said that Clinton probably worked on cases to help young men avoid the draft. "We did a whole lot of conscientious-objector work," she said.

Hayden, one of the Chicago Seven who were acquitted of inciting riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention, said he is disappointed that Clinton has tried to taint Obama with guilt by association.
"Once you introduce the concept of guilt by association, everyone is in trouble because there is no end to it," he said. "The goal is to render Barack so unelectable that the party has to turn to her. Because the goal is so narrow and obsessive, she's not aware that she's also going to be collateral damage."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. This might have been useful a month ago. Now? Not so much...
I just don't see that any of this matters at this point. It was clear that Hillary wanted to say anything that could sway the tide, whether it made sense, was hypocritical or whatnot. This is just one more among many. But the race is over at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. she still does`t understand the 60`s and she never will
..for all the "hillary was a radical" she was far from it. this one the main reason i loathe her political philosophy and admire obama`s. she can go back to being the jr senator from new york and help solve the mess that 40 years have done to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC