|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:18 AM Original message |
Poll question: How about Gary Hart for Vice President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. OMG no. NO. Are you freaking serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Very serious. Why not Gary Hart? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. His affair is too Bill Clinton-esque. Fair or not, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Hart wouldn't be at the top of the ticket, so nobody would care about "monkey business" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. No. It's a shame, but no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I don't think voters would care about that now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Think again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That was then, and this is now. The electorate would shrug at this now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
8. He's McCain's age. No thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yanez Houston Jordan (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
9. Nothing says "change" like a candidate who quit a presidential race 20 years ago due to sex scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. But who cares about that today? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. They seemed to care about the false plagerism charg against Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
11. Monkey Business is a joke by now. He'd be acceptable, but only barely. There's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
13. I think he's acceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Strongly agree on all counts, MonkeyFunk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. So the media could focus only on one thing? Not a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wetzelbill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. maybe not as a VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
17. As long as we're kickin' it old-school, how about Ferraro? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
18. I certainly believe he would be up to the job. I'm not so sure he would be up to the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
19. While I like Gary Hart... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
20. Stupidity. NOBODY forgets a sex scandal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
21. Gary Hart should have been President in 1984 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
22. Voted 'Yes.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC