Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frances Perkins: FDR's secretary of labor in 1932

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 08:18 PM
Original message
Frances Perkins: FDR's secretary of labor in 1932
FDR's biography, part 2 is on PBS at 8:00 central.

They mentioned his secretary of labor and said 'she'. Which kinda blew my mind. A woman in the cabinet way back in 1932!

She was the first woman in the cabinet and served longer than anybody else, for twelve years. Wiki says:

"s Secretary of Labor, Perkins played a key role writing New Deal legislation, including minimum-wage laws. However, her most important contribution came in 1934 as chairwoman of the President's Committee on Economic Security. In this post, she was involved in all aspects of the reports and hearings that ultimately resulted in the Social Security Act of 1935."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Perkins

Kinda funny that I never learned something so bodacious in school.

It's a miracle that I found this show while channel surfing last week, although I might have found it sooner if PBS had a better show at 7 than the antiques road show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldleftguy Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really, really cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. FDR
Was the President of the 20th Century. He is on par with Lincon and Washington.

JFK would have been great too had he had 8 years. The 3 he had were very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. it was quite interesting to get that overview and see contrasts and similarities
The press sorta coddled him for the most part. He was able to hide a fairly severe handicap without having somebody spill the beans or dig it out and expose it. The secret meeting with Churchill and the statement that they wanted to find an incident that would induce the American public to support entry into WWII. The way he ran in 1932 without offering any specifics as to what he would do, and the way the 1936 election was about HIM rather than his policies.

Also, now that I reflect, the lack of militarism in 1930s America. By necessity he kinda switched us over to major armaments manufacturing and we never really switched back. That's probably a huge exaggeration though since it's probably not more than 10-15% of our huge economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC