Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Hillary's lead in the popular vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:18 PM
Original message
So Hillary's lead in the popular vote
which states does it exclude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Every single one
Edited on Mon May-19-08 09:19 PM by Andy823
That she lost! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ok ok ok ;)
but seriously. does it include every state that's voted so far?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
38. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. none - but it includes caucus estimates for some states that refuse to release vote totals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not her version of the popular vote
When you add in the estimated totals from the caucus states, Obama leads even if you give her all of her votes from Michigan and give her none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. what are the estimates from Washington, Nebraska, Iowa, and Maine?
used in her popular vote lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. papau okay who is correct here? what are the estimates for those states?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. And that's ok why again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. No, it doesn't. It does not include the estimates for those 4 states. It completely discounts them.
That is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. It's not that they refuse to release them, they are not available
There is no popular vote total in most, if not all, caucus states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Washington, Nebraska, Iowa, and Maine
Those states don't release vote totals from the caucuses. It also gives Obama 0 votes from Michigan. Regardless of why he took his name off the ballot, it would be tough to argue that giving him 0 votes is reflective of the people of Michigan. Splitting it 50-50 is probably more representative than that, though I do think they should seat the delegates in a way that gives her some advantage, since she got 55% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
36. That just got me to thinking
that the Edwards endorsement might have been aimed also at the MI legislature. Obviously most of the uncommitted vote went to Obama and Edwards. By Edwards endorsing Obama in MI, perhaps they could conclude that Obama deserves most of if not all of the uncommitted vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. WA for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. does it include any votes out of Washington state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Colorado and Wyoming, IIRC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. someone here give us the list that adds up to her lead
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Stole this from another poster (I apologize but I forget who it was)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. wow. What a great run-down on all the possible ways to count the "popular vote" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. the Hillary supporters have now left the building
well, this thread anyway, before giving us any solid numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Every single caucus state. There is NO popular vote tally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, North Dakota, Iowa, Nevada, Nebraska, Washington, Maine
and Wyoming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. He may have to run national campaign commercials to explain this
if hillary keeps pushing her numbers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
But if it must, it must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Who is Hillary?
Is she that former presidential candidate? Bless her heart.

Remember how competitive of a race it was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Monica's laundress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here, this is what you want... RealClearPolitics results page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. she wins by counting Michigan and giving IA,, NV, ME & WA zero votes
that's her idea of counting all the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. So does that mean that voters in Iowa, Nevada, Maine, and Washington DON'T COUNT?!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. She's ahead by 38K votes IF you exclude the 4 states inlcude MI & FL as is & he's ahead otherwise
Period... Under every metric he is ahead, unless you discount the 4 states already mentioned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. It gives her 328,309 votes in Mi. to Obama's 0
Of course that's BS because Obama wasn't even on the ballot and uncommitted got 40%, but that's the math they are using. Only in Hillary world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. but i'm willing to almost grant that one if she counts all the other states
but i'm hearing that she doesn't count the other states yet goes on and on about fairness in counting all the votes.

what gives? how can she claim to want to count all the votes and to be ahead in them and at the same time speak of numbers that don't count all the votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Who cares. She's finished. Kaput. Done. Over. Toast. Washed-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. she's casting aspersions on the legitimacy of Obama's victory when it comes
that really needs to be dealt with.

if the impression is that she didn't lose fairly, it will hurt him, just as if he didn't lose fairly it would harm her chances.

this is a really, really, big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I get it. But...
I really DON'T CARE anymore. If some stupid a**hole wants to vote for McCain just because their deceitful, racist, elitist candidate didn't win the nomination, more power to them. Maybe McCain will ask Hillary to be his running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. i understand how you feel
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. It excludes WA, ME, IA, NV, and the MI uncommitteds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. got it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Realclearpolitics keeps track of all this stuff and is updated several times a day
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/

check out the box in the upper right corner

click on popular vote

she's ahead just under 27K counting MI and FL and not counting caucus states and not giving Obama any votes in MI.

By any fair count, he's up as much as 700K (not counting FL or MI and counting an estimate for caucus states)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. forget the WA caucus
And go with the WA primary, that every Hillary apologist claims was a much fairer result.

He can afford to give up the delegates, and he'll take the popular vote that the WA caucus hasn't released.

Meaning he's ahead in every possible measurement, even with the phony MI & FL elections.

And who cares anyway. By the time the popular votes are done, he'll be the nominee.

The popular vote was supposed to help her sway superdelegates, and he's been getting their support faster than ever the last 2 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. There is NO popular vote
Please don't even give it credence in any way, shape, or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC