Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't Clinton stop the constant, persistent superdelegate flow to Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:13 AM
Original message
Why can't Clinton stop the constant, persistent superdelegate flow to Obama?
And, how many superdelegates look to Karl Rove for the data, references, and sources?

And one last thing.
Who do the Clinton surrogates think they are influencing here at DU with there conference call talking points bashing Obama?

Classic Theater of the Absurd.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't Clinton close the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. That Karl Rove reference will backfire on her
It's as if her campaign can't think more than 5 minutes into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. She doesn't care about the SDs now. She has been pissing them off
for several weeks now. And everytime she does something outlandish and low, they send their message of disgust by embracing Obama. Yesterday I predicted more SDs for Obama after reading that clinton said it will be a slap in the face for Obama to declare victory tonight (like she would if she were in his shoes). Like clock work it happened. Today there will be even more after her outlandish embrace of karl rove.

Hillary is definately setting up either a demand to be on the ticket (which she would no doubt intentionally sink if she were on it), or to run in 2012.

She's signaling to her hardcare femist supporters that she won the popular vote (which is an outlandish lie) and if she doesn't get the nomination it was stolen from her. Therefore, her hardcores should not vote for Obama so that he can lose so that she can run in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Still not stopping - more today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. She can't close the D hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC