|
is that people justify the comparison to Wright being a worse situation than Parsley and Hagee as a way to "get out" of offering anything but a superficial analysis of what the effects on McCain's campaign could be. I mean, can't we even pretend to evaluate the McCain situation independently? McCain rejected the remarks, but said he was "happy to have the endorsement", until he decided that people were noticing. How will this affect the way the religious right regards him? Will his previous statement about how people should not pander to the religious right versus his current blantant attempts to court the religious right in these instances (I honestly regard most of the religious right as wackos, but these seem like particularly bad choices for the McCain camp to make if he were to pull anyone from the religious right as a means to pander) be used as an example of increasing hypocrisy that counter his image as a maverick? Will this affect his VP choice now that he may have pissed off the religious right, maybe provoking him to consider someone who has pull with evangelicals like Huckabee? Nahhhh. It's just appropriate to say that this is a much better situation for McCain than Wright was for Obama, and good for him for "cleaning house!"
I thought that David Gregory was going to maybe "go there" on his show yesterday, because he said "It's funny. Hagee has said controversial things like this before, but it was only when McCain was courting Jewish voters that he thought it appropriate to reject the endorsement." But then he completely backtracked and said "Don't get me wrong. I in no way think that this reflects on his character or integrity, I just think it's funny. That's all. I don't mean what I say. Never mind" (Ok, this obviously was not exactly what he said, but pretty much).
The thing that most bothers me about Gregory is that he asks the questions he should be asking to the Democrats on the panel to the Republicans, and asks the Democrats the dumber questions .
|