Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Timmy Russert just said (paraphrasing): "He can't pick another woman, if he wants a woman..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:43 PM
Original message
Timmy Russert just said (paraphrasing): "He can't pick another woman, if he wants a woman..."
Re: VP pick

"He can't justify to people, if he wants to pick a woman, to pick another woman, and not Hillary."

Why not? Why not just say, "He can't justify picking anyone other than Hillary."

Are there no other women politicians? Is gender the main consideration? Is Hillary unassailable?

I'm confused.

Fuck Timmy. As a feminist, I found his whole line of reasoning quite offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. He can so.
Edited on Fri May-23-08 05:44 PM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because Women Think Guys Are Assholes When They Trade In For a New Model
And the old one works just fine. Does that spell it out well enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Bad analogy.
When was Hillary ever Baracks current model? They've never had a political relationship of that nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I was just about to type the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. No, Not Really
Edited on Fri May-23-08 06:11 PM by Crisco
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.

Because women think men are assholes when they trade out for a new model and there's nothing wrong with the old one, but women know men are assholes if they think women should do the same thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I'll have to read this again in a few hours.
because that went right over my head. But I will allow for the possibility that I am in the wrong frame of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. Nope. Still doesn't make sense.
Ah well then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. and you guys think Obama's supporters . . .
are sexist.

(He can do better).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. But Clinton DOESN'T work just fine. That's the whole issue. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was thinking that Tim's crazy if he believes Obama would even consider HRC now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Russert is an owlfaced enemabag. You can tell he doesn't know what he's talking about when
his lips are moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. bwahaha!
Edited on Fri May-23-08 05:59 PM by ima_sinnic
:spray:

"owlfaced enemabag" just --BWAHAHA -- just struck me as -- heeheehee, hahaha-- :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. Aw, don't besmirch Big Russ' baby boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Lol that has to be one of my favorite SwampRats :D n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, and why the HELL would that be?
ARRGH! Only one female contender allowed at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You've hit the nail on the head - "only one female contender at a time"
What punks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. After todays major gaffe, he can go out on the street and pick any woman for VP... Hillary...
is screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He just said this on MSNBC!
Like, five minutes ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Well, he's wrong. That line of thinking is so three hours ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. He can choose whoever is the right choice for his administration
In spite of whatever Timmy pontificates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Timmy is nothing but an arrogant jerk
To think that he gets paid big bucks to spout off his worthless opinions!!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Russert is forgetting someone obvious.
I can't believe no one's floated this idea yet...an outspoken woman...not Hillary herself...because that might mobilize the GOP...but someone associated with her campaign...someone who can bring Hillary's supporters back into the fold...Yes! Obama should select Geraldine Ferraro!

But more seriously: you are not confused. You're spot on. Obama is either obligated to offer it to Hillary or he can offer it to anyone he damn well pleases, regardless of gender. Personally, I vote for the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. "There can be only ONE"...
I truly hate this line of reasoning - that because Hillary has girl parts, this of course disqualifies all other potential candidates with girl parts.

Unfortunately, we get the same reasoning here from Hillary supporters. The bottom line of all this is we NEVER think this way about men. Can anyone EVER imagine Paul Tsongas's supporters getting mad at Clinton for Picking another candidate with guy parts?

What's truly amazing is how this view has been translated into commmon knowledge which everyone agrees on. Hillary supporters will OF COURSE be offended, and everyone will OF COURSE think that Obama is only picking a token candidate.

So tough luck Sebelius and Napolitano. There can be only ONE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. You've got a point . . .
If Hillary were winning, would they say she couldn't pick any other man or veep than Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. That is extremely offense to women everywhere who aren't named Hillary Clinton
Edited on Fri May-23-08 06:42 PM by Cali_Democrat
Tim Russert: You can only pick a woman if she's the wife of an ex-president. Women can't do it on their own and they need to ride their husband's coattails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm kind of conflicted about this
In a way, I guess I could see how some women would think it was a naked pander to them to garner their favor. But ultimately, it completely underscores their argument that they support Hillary Clinton because she is the best candidate and not because she is a woman. If their reasons for supporting Hillary (in addition to supporting her because she is empowering to women) are mostly because they strongly believe that her qualities for president qualify her in a unique way, why should they be especially offended if the VP choice is a woman? If someone is that adament about Hillary being on the ticket, then it is offensive to me that they were be even MORE offended if a woman is on the ticket than if a man is on the ticket. They should just be offended that Hillary is not on the ticket. Though it does become personal I suppose if people especially think that Hillary Clinton should have been "the first" to make history in this regards, that a different woman would possibly make it and Hillary would not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. As a man, I dream of a day...
where the selection of a VP is chosen based on logical arguments. This involves:

- Matching to the President's style
- Shoring up weaknesses (exec experience, etc.)
- Help bringing votes to a state or region
- Help with a voting block

The help with a voting block could be independents, low-income voters, Hispanics, women, etc.

But the choice of what sex parts the VP has should only be considered in relation to those issues listed above. NOT whether or not the woman's slot has already been filled, or whether the minority slot has been filled. This is just specious crap.

And those who call themselves feminists who buy into the reasoning that all other women are now off-limits really need to check their assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I am a borderline radfem
And I totally agree with your post.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Guess what, timmy the russert?
It's not about being a "woman", a "Black", or a pinstripe..it's about being the best for the job. So please take you rabid analysis and stick on the prong of useless information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bull shit!
I am so god damned sick of this idiotic "Queen Bee" syndrome where we all assume there is only one seat for a woman at the table. It's anti-feminism in a very ugly incarnation and way to many of us buy into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. I heard that.
It was an idiotic thing to say, but then, he's been known to do that more than once!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hillaryists =/= feminists.
They don't give a shit about women. To them, Hillary is the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. well, he certainly can now.
Today, she made that possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yep. She sure did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. Any woman picked...
...should be an experienced politician, dedicated servant of the people, and of the Democratic party, who came up the hard way, worked hard to get the nomination, only to be shouldered out of the way by a media-darling interloper.

And the nomination she didn't get -- U.S. Senate, NY, 2002.

I give you US Rep Nita Lowey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. Says Mr Potato Head Russert? Because there's only 1 electable Dem female in the country?
What an idiot!

Yes, that's right everyone. Tim Russert has declared that there is only one electable Democratic female in the entire country and her name is Hillary and if Obama even wanted to consider a female he has one choice and one choice only. Says Mr. Tim Russert. The pundit. The asshole.

We have 1 female that Obama is allowed to select. How about that?

WOW! My head is still exploding! You condescending . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. His comment is perfectly logical. He can't pick a woman other than Hillary.
Edited on Fri May-23-08 09:32 PM by TexasObserver
Because if he does, Hillary's supporter will throw an even bigger hissy fit than they will if he chooses a male for VP.

I don't think Russert implied that Obama would pick Hillary, simply that he would not pick another woman over Hillary for VP. I think Russert is correct about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Don't worry about Timmy, Lucy. He went to the Christmas party at Rumsfeld's when they caught Saddam.
And he was so thrilled to be one of the first 100 neocons to learn about it.

Russert can't wait to bash Obama and tell everyone what a fucking hero McCain was for getting shot down over Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well, he can now.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. only one woman per election cycle!!! don't you know the rules??
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. Amen
There are plenty of talented women who know the Congress and/or have administrative experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. I've determined that Russert is just shitfaced all the time
And says anything that pops into his noggin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's a Cross Promotional Tie-In: the same people who own Hillary own Timmeh
Edited on Sat May-24-08 04:17 PM by kenny blankenship
He's obligated to push the product --NO SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED!

Chris Matthews admitted the bias for Hillary, and interestingly also for the War (another cross promoted product), that he felt from his employers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
43. 1) Hillary uses assassination as a campaign strategy. 2)...
she lies and can't be trusted. 3) She so desperately believes she is entitled to be president that she will do anything, including court assassins, to get her way.

Obama's a nice guy, but he's not an idiot. He's not going to have as VP someon who just sent a shout-out to bigotted assassins.

And Russert is completely out of touch with reality if he thinks that anyond would blame Obama for not picking Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. Why not? Are we all the same now?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
45. You want sexism? Here it is
Tim, we treat people as individuals, not a group defined by sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC