Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton is lying about the 92 Primary ending in June.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:58 PM
Original message
Clinton is lying about the 92 Primary ending in June.
"... Clinton effectively won the Democratic Party's nomination after winning the New York Primary in early April."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992#Democratic_Party_nomination


Why does she get away with making statements like this? No one challenges her. This part of her comments are
relatively insignificant compared to the rest of her statement. But I am so sick of this pattern. She says whatever
serves her purpose and often gets away with it. She has been saying this for months as one more justification for
her staying in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the 1992 primary lasted to June, then she's comparing herself to Jerry Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Who, if I'm not mistaken, lost.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jerry Brown Campaigned All the Way to the Convention
Where he was nominated, then seconded himself ... and cried at the podium when he spoke of his father, Pat Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. On the subject of lying
I lived back in 1992. My state voted late in 1992. My ballot had Clinton and Brown on it. Brown was still contesting states, including both mine (Ohio) and his (California) in June of 1992. I know this because I actually was alive and voted in that race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Democratic_presidential_primary

Although Brown continued to campaign in a number of states, he won no further primaries. Despite this, he still had a sizable number of delegates, and a big win in his home state of California would deprive Clinton of sufficient support to win the nomination, which Brown apparently thought would revert to him by default. After nearly a month of intense campaigning and multiple debates between the two candidates, Clinton managed to defeat Brown in this final primary by a margin of 48% to 41%

end of quote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I lived way back then too.
I also have a clear memory that Clinton had the race locked up early as the above quote says.
Yes Brown stayed in but had no real chance of winning the nomination. I remember...he was my candidate.
I wanted him to win. I did not like Clinton. Although of course I voted for him in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. so where is her alledged lie?
He stayed in as you admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. He stayed in. So did Huckleberry.
Neither had a chance to win. She did not just say he stayed in. She said her
husband did not wrap up the nomination until June. History says he effectively won
in late March or early April.

She has been saying twisting the facts about this since February to justify her continuing.

You ask does Hillary lie. Oh just a little now and again whenever she needs to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. and he didn't statistcally
He got the last delegate he needed to have a statistical lock the night of the california primary as your link pointed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. It wasn't "locked up" until after the Calif Primary in 1992
Clinton was ahead but he didn't have the majority of delegates until after the Calif primary. There was a possibility, albeit a slim one, that a big win by Jerry Brown could have denied Bill Clinton the nomination. He wasn't "officially" the nominee until after the Calif primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And I doubt if there such a concerted effort to drive Jerry Brown out, either
In fact, I remember seeing Bill Clinton and Jerry Brown in a debate where Jerry Brown slipped in his 800 number, and the moderator tried to stop it, but Bill just laughed and said, "we all know it by now". I remember it particularly, because Bill Clinton rose in my estimation at that very moment. Of course, Bill relished competition. He wasn't afraid of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't blame me, I voted for Charles Woods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. In March of 1992:
.......
Tsongas, running low on money, withdrew earlier than had been expected, saying, "the alternative was to play the role of spoiler... That is not what I'm about. That is not worthy. I did not survive my ordeals in order to be the agent of the re-election of George Bush."

......
"Everybody hoped we'd have a nominee early," said Dee Dee Myers, Mr. Clinton's press secretary. "Now we're not there yet, but I think we're one step closer. Now the job is to define George Bush and to make this a two-person race."

.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bill Clinton Had it sewn up by March 17
<img src="">

February 10, 1992: Iowa senator Tom Harkin wins his state's caucus. No surprise here. No candidate was challenging him.
February 18, 1992: Former Massachusetts senator Paul Tsongas wins New Hampshire. Clinton finishes second and brands himself the "comeback kid."

February 25, 1992: Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey wins South Dakota.

March 3, 1992: Mini-Super Tuesday. Clinton wins Georgia. Former California governor Jerry Brown wins Colorado. Tsongas wins Maryland. Harkin wins the Minnesota and Idaho caucuses.

March 7, 1992: Clinton wins South Carolina.

March 10, 1992: Super Tuesday. Clinton wins six southern states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas. Tsongas wins Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

March 17, 1992: Clinton essentially ends the contest with a win in Illinois (though Brown would briefly reemerge with a victory in Connecticut one week later).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Good Post. Can you lead me to a link for the 68 calendar and the rest of 92?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Here's a link to 1992. Bill had 3372 delegates, Jerry Brown 596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Link to 1968 Primaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. "Essentially" does not mean "officially"
Bill Clinton did not have a majority of the delegate counts until June.

It's the same now... Obama has "essentially" won the nomination but has not yet won it officially.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. The queen of distortion strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I worked on the Jerry Brown campaign in Calif in 1992
Bill Clinton did not have a majority of the delegates until the Calif primary the first week in June, 1992. Yes, it was expected that he would win the nomination but he didnot actually have a majority of delegates until June.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. I worked on the Jerry Brown campaign in Calif in 1992
Bill Clinton did not have a majority of the delegates until the Calif primary the first week in June, 1992. Yes, it was expected that he would win the nomination but he didnot actually have a majority of delegates until June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Didn't have a majority? Bill had 3372 delegates, Jerry Brown 596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. That was going into the convention, after the Calif vote
Edited on Fri May-23-08 06:54 PM by housewolf
Did you read the Wikipedia article? Did you see this part re Jerry Brown:
"Despite this, he still had a sizable number of delegates, and a big win in his home state of California would deprive Clinton of sufficient support to win the nomination,"

I was there.... I know what of I speak....





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Even without The california vote Bill had about 3,000 delegates to Jerry brown 596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, looks like the OP is wrong. I have heard Bill Clinton recently say that it was June.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Was he wagging his finger as he said it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Excuse me.
If Bill Clinton said it.....than that would be true. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. a truly unimpeachable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. Clinton was the presumptive nominee by March 18.
Clinton defeated Tsongas and Brown in the Illinois primary on March 17, and that was the end of the real contest. There were still a few odd twists (Clinton finished behind both Brown and non-candidate Tsongas in Connecticut, and there was a flurry of speculation that Tsongas would re-enter the race), but once Paul quit, it was essentially over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. But it wasn't "locked up" (as Hillary put it) until June
Bill Clinton didn't have a majority of the delegates until after the Calif primary in June. I was there... There was a possibility, albeit a slim one, that a big win by Jerry Brown could have denied Bill Clinton the nomination.

It was like now... Obama has "essentially" won the nomination but not "officially." Bill Clinton didn't "officially" win it until June 1992, after the Calif primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. 1992 had a very different dynamic
Tsongas won NH, MA, RI, AZ, UT, WA, ME, DE, MD, tied Harkin in ID and MN, and collected a good chunk of delegates in IL, MO, CT, CO, FL, GA, TN, NY; Harkin won IA, ID, and MN, Kerrey won SD. There were a lot of non-Brown delegates floating around out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4HowardDean Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
29.  2145 delegates were need to win in 1992. Clinton had about 3,000 before calif.
election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. ah well....she 'Mis-remembered'
she does that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. You're embarrassing yourself by citing Wikipedia.
That's like using the National Enquirer on a Works Cited page on a college research paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
34. Why? Because Hillary is a LIAR. Because she routinely LIES.
She's incapable of NOT LYING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hillary is lying about "fill in the blank"
She claims to have been vetted but the truth is she's been treated with kid gloves through out this whole primary. She f*cking lost, she needs to act like an adult and accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC