ANYONE who has watched CNN's campaign coverage has encountered Lanny Davis, a former special counsel to Bill Clinton. Lately Mr Davis has tiptoed towards the edge of the deep end, but I think we finally have proof that he's gone off. The die-hard Hillary supporter has compiled a list of "Four Things Obama Campaign Couldn't Resist Doing To Anger Clinton Supporters He Needs In General Election If -- If -- He Is Nominee". Read it, you'll laugh.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/The_conversation_Never_say_die_.html (I found number three especially ironic.)
Mr Davis's childish list is just the latest indication of an attitude that has poisoned the Clinton campaign from the very beginning. Mrs Clinton and her supporters saw the primary process as a coronation, not a competition, and the fact that Mr Obama ran a better campaign and emerged victorious simply isn't fair. This is theft on a grand scale, never mind that Mrs Clinton never owned the stolen property or that Mr Obama did nothing illegal to obtain it. Reason is no match for the bitterness felt by many of Mrs Clinton's supporters.
At least she is owed the vice-presidency, they are now shouting. Alas, no. But if and when Mr Obama officially spurns these entreaties by announcing a different running mate, the resentment will only increase. Another case of larceny in their eyes.
Is five months (perhaps less) enough time for Mrs Clinton's supporters to clear their heads? Only with Mrs Clinton's help. When the time is right, after Mr Obama has reached the magic number of delegates, she (and Bill) must recognise her opponent's win as fair and legitimate, and quash the inevitable cries of "if only the press wasn't biased", "if only America wasn't a sexist nation", "if only for a better deal on Florida and Michigan". Otherwise, all of the acrimony of her supporters will be aimed at Mr Obama, who, they'll say, was abetted in a crime by these outside factors. Will Mrs Clinton take the fall for her own defeat, or poison the party by placing responsibility elsewhere and thereby painting her loss as a theft?
Link:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2008/05/those_bitter_clinton_supporter.cfm