Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So sad to watch Hillary's long, slow, spiralling plunge into the ground.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:48 AM
Original message
So sad to watch Hillary's long, slow, spiralling plunge into the ground.
Kind of like a stricken Sopwith Camel trailing a streamer of oil smoke.

The woman carries the seeds of greatness, as does Bill. But both of them have a fatal flaw in the form of a dedication to expediency. When their ship starts taking on water, they jettison the heaviest thing they can find in an effort to stay afloat. Unfortunately, they both find their ethics to be that heaviest thing.

I believe that Bill had decent liberal instincts at one time. But in the interest of retaining power through the Gingrich years, he violated his liberal precepts one after another, and ended up voting for NAFTA and pushing through Tommy Thompson-style welfare "reform," going to war in Bosnia under dubious circumstances, and continuing the low-grade war against Iraq throughout his years in power. The number of crimes subject to the death penalty increased during his reign, and he failed to end discrimination against gays in the military.

Even during her White House years, Hillary showed signs of her flaw. The most egregious example that comes to mind is the monstrosity she created and called a health plan. I think we're lucky it didn't pass. Remember Ross Perot's diagram? When laid out as a flow chart, Hillary's program looked like the circuit diagram for a Pentium chip. It looked like that because of all the compromises and sellouts to the health insurance industry that it contained. Yes the insurance industry finally sank it with their Harry & Louise campaign, but not before they had already negotiated it into a misshapen Frankenstein monster.

So, all-in-all, I do not look forward to the return of the Macbeths to the White House (even though I guess I would have to vote for them in preference to Voldemort).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. so much for the faithful sopwith camel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seeds of greatness? Hardly.
Let's see, she's run up $30M in campaign debt and had a woefully mismanaged campaign. She refuses to listen to advisors who have her best interests at heart because it clashes with what she wants. It is the exact same behavior as George W Bush has exhibited time and time again. There is no greatness in that. The only way she could ever hope to even touch greatness is to bow out now. Today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Agree, but it's enlightening and funny to see who crawl out
of her ass to defend her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. should have been able to fight the campaign on the issues alone
but she hasn't been able to do that. The only way has been to chip away at her opponent's integrity and that has failed too....so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, McCain's not exactly the equal of Voldemort . . .
Edited on Sat May-24-08 08:56 AM by MrModerate
What's the name of the henchman, the one who was Ron's rat for the first few books . . .

I agree with you about the expediency issue although I'm not so quick to label it "ethical" expediency as "policy" expediency.

The health care mess came about, IMO, because of the Clintons' relative inexperience (they hadn't faced Really Big Guns before), and a misguided optimism that they could triangulate around their opposition when that opposition was utterly committed to smashing them to bits (and their little dog, too).

As it stands now, it's hard to imagine any single force in America more inimical to our survival as a free (and reasonably healthy) people than the health insurance industry. They're the Death-eaters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Peter Pettigrew/Wormtail.
And that's exactly what I was thinking as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I fight the bastards every day.
Or rather, my OP mental health clinic hires someone practically full-time to do that. As both a provider and consumer, I hate and despise the health insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Absolutely maddening and inexplicable at the same time . . .
How did we create a system whereby an industry that delivers no value whatsoever sucks up so much of the health care dollar?

I say nationalize the lot of 'em, with investors getting about 3 cents on the totally obscene dollar valuation.

Then disestablish 'em wholesale. Retrain the workers (about a tenth of them, that being all you'd need) to process billing paperwork, keep 1 percent of the middle managers just because someone has to fill out performance evaluations, and tell the senior management to find a career doing something useful (if they can).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bill Clinton said in 1992 that he was offering a better version of NAFTA....
Edited on Sat May-24-08 08:56 AM by Eric J in MN
...than George H. W. Bush.

NAFTA wasn't something Bill Clinton decided to support after Gingrich became Speaker of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Point taken.
Thanks for the correction. I hadn't remembered those circumstances. I do remember that lots of the Dems in Congress opposed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ok, Great title to the post. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have never seen seeds of greatness in her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Like Britney, guess who is responsible for this?...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Maybe we should start referring to Hillary Clinton
As the Britney Spears of politics



Meltdown city
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Meanwhile, in the real world, she's whupping Obama.
Gallup: Clinton leads McCain and Obama

Clinton leads McCain 49-45.
McCain leads Obama 47-45.

Rasmussen:

Clinton leads McCain by 3
McCain leads Obama by 2

Newsweek:

Clinton leads McCain 48-44
McCain and Obama tie 44-44
http://hillary1000.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/bill-clinton-has-never-seen-a-candidate-treated-so-disrespectfully-just-for-running/#more-572
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Clinton is still losing to Obama
Your post says she is whupping him ....but you offer NO EXAMPLE.

The fact is that Obama won Iowa and never looked back ...to say Hillary is 'whupping Obama' is absurd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. The Clintons sold out way back in Arkansas when they took money from Jackson Stevens
haven't you been paying attention?

Jeez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Good people corrupted by wealth and power.
A story as old as civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Great post, salient points. They are both people who, standing at the fork in the road,
took the wrong path. Seems it led them both into a devlish Hell, although I believe as well they were both destined for greatness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC