Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The irony of Hillary's analogy to RFK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:17 AM
Original message
The irony of Hillary's analogy to RFK
Edited on Sat May-24-08 09:18 AM by Jeff In Milwaukee
Let's leave aside for just a moment the creepiness that we get from contemplating that Hillary Clinton has done the mental calculus to determine how the death of Barak Obama would benefit her politically and personally. That's simply an ugly part of her personality and a rock that's best left lying exactly where it is.

The practical side of her analogy is simply this: What if something terrible happened to Barak Obama? Be it political assassination, an unspeakable gaffe, or some previously-unknown dirty laundry that doesn't come to light until the week before the 4th of July. What if something happens to the Obama Campaign and Obama, for whatever reason, is not the Democratic Nominee?

Does Hillary really think that after months of negative campaigning, including praising John McCain and Fox News, she could simply waltz into the Denver Convention Center and walk away with the nomination? Does Hillary not think that maybe John Edwards or Al Gore might decide that the Democratic Party would better served with somebody (read:anybody) other than she as its standard-bearer in November?

The irony in her strategy of circling the Obama Campaign like a vulture is that, in order to stay in the race, she has had to say and do some many things unbecoming a potential president -- much less a Potential Democratic President -- that she has fatally wounded her chances of ever being that default candidate.

She can recover from this politically. Politicians both Republican (Nixon) and Democratic (Clinton) have come back after electoral defeats and gone on to both great and ignominious things. Hillary is smart and determined, and I've no doubt that she can do the same.

If.

If she leaves the campaign now. Like by the end of this week. Forget the fantasy of a graceful exit -- any gracefulness remaining in the Clinton campaign was left metaphorically bleeding to death in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel yesterday. She overstayed her welcome in the 2008 campaign more than a month. If she says much longer, she will have overstayed her welcome in American Politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Spot on.
She does a good job for the voters of NY. She needs to fold up her tent and go home and concentrate on doing her best for NY'ers across the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's a very good Senator...
And I like the idea that been floated of appointing her to the Supreme Court. But she needs to understand that this particular campaign is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Believe me, she's not that good of a Senator. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I used to have George Voinovich and Mike DeWine...
You're just spoiled!

Now I am, having Russ Feingold as my Senator. Kohl is just OK, but Russ rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I really envy you Russ. He's a gem! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. If you're Fort Drum in upstate NY she's a good Senator
Brought Billions to the MIC up here. My city now exists only to serve the Base near it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. SCOTUS needs judges with experience and sound judgment: HRC lacks both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Appointing Supreme Court Jusices is like buying scratch off lottery tickets...
You really don't know what you're going to get until you've made the decision. JFK appointed Byron White, who went on to dissent in Miranda and Roe v. Wade and to allow the death penalty for juvenile offenders. Harry Blackmun was appointed by Nixon and went on to write the majority opinion for Roe v Wade, uphold the rights of homosexuals to engage in intercourse without interference by the state, and to become a staunch opponent of the death penalty. So as soon as you develop a system for predicting the effectiveness of Supreme Court Justice nominees, you let me know.

I have Lotto tickets to buy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Nope, Chemerinsky would be TONS better! Hillary would screw us on corporate personhood!

Hillary would likely be even worse than Rehnquist (who dissented at times) on the issue of corporate personhood.

That issue in my book is as important as Roe v. Wade in who our next SCOTUS selection is!

I think the best position for Hillary at this point would be for her to run for NY Governor. Earn her way back to notoriety where her decisions don't have as much national consequences, and I think it would be a good place to rebuild her image there if she can do good things for the state there first. And she could immediately appoint RFK, Jr. to replace her in the Senate who would do a fine job to pay him back for his support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. She's never lost before
so knowing how to do it sadly is not in her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. She lost the governorship in Arkansas.
35 years experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. LOL
No Bill lost that race.

Every race she's run since 2000 has been handed to her on a platter. This is very confusing to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I prefer the Greek tragic ending with the hero foiled by their own hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Rule Book
You people will have to write a new rulebook that indicates what facts can be stated and which ones can't. One for the nominee you like where that includes how to state things without any meaning that people like to hear, and one for the nominee you hate and all facts that are to be censored.
Once upon a time in America facts could be stated to prove a point, or to discuss. Not any more.
These Obama supporters on DU P are like hungry wolves, surrounding, tearing flesh, blood dripping from their mouths. I wonder how many out in the real world are the same. Makes a person pause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. "hungry wolves, surrounding, tearing flesh, blood dripping from their mouths."
Edited on Sat May-24-08 09:50 AM by crankychatter
omg

and WE are overdramatic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. "hungry wolves, surrounding, posting Wright, Ayers, bitter, proud, sweetie threads repeatedly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. You are delusional
Hard core Hillary supporters have been just as, if not more demeaning than Obama supporters have been. They have trashed peoples' hope and calls for unity. They have ignored reality.

Obama uses "facts" and rules to defeat your candidate and all you can do is whine. If you cannot take the time to examine the facts in this case and see what people are talking about, then it is you who are a fool.

Facts:
Hillary brought up RFKs assassination on at least 5 occasions to make a point.
Hillary's analogy failed to provide the real context or history. Ignored in the hopes no one would notice.
Ted Kennedy was in the hospital 3 days earlier
RFK's assassination anniversary is in less than two weeks.
Obama has been receiving death threats since he began the campaign
Their is historical precedent for assassinations to prevent Democrats from winning office.
Right wing thugs are armed and dangerous
You are an apologist, a hypocrit and a dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. and people wonder why I made the comparison with Livia a week back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Overly dramatic, aren't we?
Of course I WAS tearing flesh last night at dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. It's why I wear a bib...
don't want to get blood on my shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
39. wwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Your last paragraph - perfect summation! Every word true.
:thumbsup: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. The practical side of her analogy is simply this:
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:17 AM by Seabiscuit
Nomination campaigns often continue not only through June, but all the way to the Convention.

Period.

See: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6107402

All other meanings attributed to her comments on DU during the past 24 hours are acts of desperation and moral decrepitude.

Shame on you and your Obamanoid brethren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. When was the last time that a nomination was settled at the convention?
That's what the primary system is meant to avoid -- backroom deals that don't reflect the will of the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. That's like trying to drink from the bottom half of the glass.
She could have referenced 1988, 1984, 1980, 1976...all of which still had races taking place in June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. She should have referenced 1976. Even ignoring the RFK tragedy, 1968 was a fucking disaster...
and justifying your campaign by saying that it's no different than in some year in which we were horribly divided and lost pathetically is actually making a case about how you should get the hell out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wow great fucking post Jeff
"her strategy of circling the Obama Campaign like a vulture" great imagery here. If anything horrible like she is hoping for were to happen to Obama-Gore or Edwards would be the better alternatives because anybody not blinded by some other agenda can plainly see that she is mentally unstable and unfit to serve as POTUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good post
and it's brought some of the dead-enders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. HRC won't leave. She's just too self-righteous. She is OWED The Presidency and she will have it...
Or else!?! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
Despite Obama's statement forgiving her for her comment, I am still angry at her. To a lot of us who were traumatized by the events of 1968, her statement was beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think she will retain her senate seat.
I believe most Americans are tired of negative campaigns. I also believe Obama will wipe the floor with McCain once McCain goes all-out negative, Rove-style.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I agree.. People are not as misinformed as they once were
it's much easier to get all sides of a story now than it was even when W stole it in 2000. Most people aren't as easily fooled by Hannity as they once were, and the ones who are are going to be questioning 5 or 6 bucks a gallon for gas in Nov. I don't predict a landslide(although if he wins by 2 points he could call it a mandate :rofl: ) but I bet Obama wins easily..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. He WILL win.
:hi: The Dum-Dums don't have a chance. :D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. Well, OB could've named her to SCOTUS,but,but,but
NOT NOW !!!!
Douchebag for Liberty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Perfect, well-said, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. I felt the irony lay...
in the fact that she was explaining how she did not understand the reasons some people use for her to suspend her campaign.

While discussing how she does not understand why she should suspend her campaign she provided another reason why she should suspend her campaign...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. It was a very disingenuous moment...
Does she REALLY not understand why people think she should get out of the race? Really? If she's that tone-deaf to the opinion of the voters, how is she going to make decisions as President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. And how will she meet with other nation's leaders when she makes gaffes like this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
34. If I wantd to head to Tombstone Territory theres lots of descriptions of that Ghoul in a Pantsuit
I could use...here's a safe one...
"HAVE ANOTHER DOUGHNUT,SENATOR! LOOKIN' GOOD! You & Beer Belly Bill!"


Latest California SUPER Delegate to Endorse Obama
Senator BILL McKAY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
36. In this doomsday scenario, you'd be foolish to think another candidate
could catch up with her delagate count. She would certainly be the nominee in that unlikely scenario. I also think that expecting her to drop out of the race when the finish line is basically upon us is completely unrealistic. She will take this to the convention and I expect she will lose there with as much grace as is still possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sane readers will note there was no analogy. Back away from the thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC