Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the "i don't think she meant anything by it/gaffe" meme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:28 AM
Original message
the "i don't think she meant anything by it/gaffe" meme
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM by beezlebum
she meant it.i don't believe she meant she was "hoping" for it. but she definitely meant something. and you can not convince me that her "explanation" was what she meant.

yes, the kennedys have been on her mind- since january.

it was the FOURTH mention of it. it is a talking point.

she knew this would not go over well, but imnsho, she did what she intended to do:

it is a subliminal suggestion to super delegates that "just as with the last hope and change/sky will open up candidate, and as the first viable black candidate, obama might get assassinated, so (they'd) better back (HER)." in the same vein as "obama is black and can't win over the klan, so (they'd) better pick (HER)."

how many "mispeakings?" "tired-gaffeings?" how many? how many???? how many "suggestions" has she not meant? how many times has she lied unintentionally and yet repeatedly?

i am not overreacting. i am fed up.
i am not kneejerking. the longer it goes on, the more justification and excusing i see, the more wrong she is.

this was not an innocent mistake. i refuse to pity her. i refuse to excuse her this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. She is trying to sow fear and doubt in the Supderdelegates.
IMO, she is saying to the supers, be careful. Obama is not durable or electable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. And that all those white, middle-class, gun and bible toting voters of hers
Don't like him very much and you never know what could happen with those people. For god's sake they're already threatening to vote republican so who knows what else they might do, you know? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:31 AM
Original message
I don't think that Hillary
was trying to use subliminal suggestions to encourage such an act.

I do think she used that word as part of her strategy -- kind of like her "as far as I know" remark -- to get people thinking 'what if?'. Gosh, what IF the unthinkable happened to Obama, we NEED Clinton around if something like that were to happen. Like that. The fact that she's cited RFK's assassination previously makes me think I'm right. Otherwise she could have just said "Both my husband and Bobby Kennedy took their campaigns into June..."

There was a reason she used that word. More than once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Exactly...
I agree with you... what a surprise that is;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. you can't know what she meant
in the context of what she said, your theory seems ridiculous to me. It seems clear to me exactly what she was talking about, that is, she was talking about races that went late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Er... that's why we have LANGUAGE - to know what people mean...
And it's as clear as day that she meant: one reason for her to stay in is because of the lesson learned from RFK being assassinated in June.

That's why language EXISTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezy2736 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. I've been looking for a way to say it as simply as
"...one reason for her to stay in is because of the lesson learned from RFK being assassinated in June."

Would you mind if I borrowed those words? I've been trying to find them, but you did it perfectly well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Rock on - just be prepared: some people take exception to my words...
I can't for the life of me figure out why, of course, but they do. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezy2736 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Ah, don't pay attention to 'em.
Words don't count any more, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Problem is Enrique
The word assassination, had no reason to be in the context of her statement. She could have just said. Robert Kennedy had also ran a campaign into June. That is all...the word assassination was not needed. Everyone knows what happened to RFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not a gaffe when you do it over and over and over. It's a fucking TACTIC...
It doesn't even pass the laugh test for gaffe-dom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. KO had a list of about 100 things she's been excused for over the campaign
Yet she still claims she's the victim and being treated unfairly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Unforgivable
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:33 AM by sniffa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. I really resent being blamed for seeing this incident clearly for what it is.
I resent being accused of overreacting for thinking that she meant what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. so do i.
it's making more angry, being accused of "overreacting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh goody, it's not official until it's a "gate" and a "meme"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. UNFORGIVABLE!
KO was right. This is the kind of thing where an apology just doesn't cut it. Hillary has just shown that she is completely unsuitable to be President.

She needs to get out now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. "the 'i don't think she meant anything by it/gaffe' meme" meme
Again? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. '''"i don't think she meant anything by it gaffe" meme' meme' meme?
again really?1

i have seen that countless times. are you calling them out too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. You've nailed it perfectly.
This was no accident. She knew exactly what she was saying and meant to say it. She was just arrogant enough to think it wouldn't cause this kind of a shitstorm, especially since she's been able to get away with the same sentiments previously. The Clintons rarely, if ever, say anything publicly by "accident." There's always a calculation and purpose behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. oh i think she knew there'd be a shitstorm
but that she could get away with it anyway, because she's still planted & fertilized that seed of doubt/worry.

agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. Have faith, you are not knee jerking
There is a definite pattern. And it needs to be called out for what it is, wedge politics from a candidate who cannot see what is in front of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM
Original message
for the most part we're arguing with republican operatives
they're coming out of the fucking woodwork

there is NO unity problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. i was encouraged to see some
longtime DU Clinton supporters recognizing that there is no justification to be made, and, i do believe you are right- rep operatives are wasting my time and energy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dog whistle to scare the SDs
that's exactly what they're doing

been doing it all along

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Are you Sylvia Browne, Kreskin or Dr. Joyce Brothers?
So much supposed psychic ability....do you make money of this "gift" of reading people's thoughts and intentions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Thankfully, you don't have to be. You just have to be a competent English speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Bwwwaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:49 AM by Notorious Bohemian
:rofl: Half the people here can't even spell. :rofl: :rofl:

BTW: John McCain's had FOUR bouts of skin cancer since 2000. Funny how that slipped past everyone's attention....it's not like there's not wall to wall coverage of THAT, now is it? Oh wait, they never mentioned it - MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. more like
an average sentient voter who has observed some very nasty tactics over the last 5 months and noted the repeated suggestion among others.

it's pretty obvious, one doesn't need much insight to see what she is getting at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
29. When I said once is a mistake, three times is a pattern,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. he is good.
i knew that. :)

:hi: bloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
31. not only is there absolutely no excuse
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:59 AM by Carolina
for her words, but even her alleged timeline argument is flawed. In 1968 and 1992, primary campaigns didn’t really get started until ~February. In fact in 1968, RFK didn’t announce until March much to the ire of those who felt he was undercutting Gene McCarthy who had won in New Hampshire and shown how weak LBJ was. That’s why LBJ announced, also in March, that he “would not seek nor would he accept the nomination of his party…” I remember it like it was yesterday since I worked on RFK's campaign and lived in DC.

And while CA may have put Bill officially over the top in June 1992, he had already essentially sown up the nomination in April.

Hillary is a liar and her words truly revealed her ugly and craven heart. There is no excuse or absolution for them.

edited to add: She is also not fit to serve in RFK's senate seat!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. I'm not giving her the benefit of the doubt
She is showing us who she is and I refuse to take her for granted. She knew exactly what she was saying as she had no problem repeating it over and over. Obama's bitter comment was a gaffe and people knew exactly what the man was saying. I only know of one time that he made such a comment but you couldn't tell the hillbots that who were pushing it for all it was worth on this board. What she said was no gaffe, she repeated that nonsense. She gets chance after chance to repeat such shit, could you imagine if Obama would of said such a thing about her? Oh hell the MSM would be talking about it all the way up to Nov and her supporters would of burned an effigy of him at the stake. The double standard an hypocrisy is astonishing and I cannot believe there are some on this board speculating that Axelrod will use this. I think they are smart enough to know not to touch her words as they do their own damage on their own. You see, that is the difference between Obama who has class and Hillary who has none. She jumped all over bitter gate using it to her advantage. Obama made one statement and left it at that and he had every right to make such statement since her words were so nasty.

I'm not going to let them tell me what I heard and what it meant. They can defend her till they are blue in the face but it is obvious that this is not sitting well with people. I'm sure come next week this will still be front and center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. Exactly...and remember She's a Lawyer...

In the context of Obama, Clinton's words broke a double taboo, because since the beginning of his candidacy, some of Obama's supporters have feared that his race made him more of a target than other presidential hopefuls. Obama was placed under Secret Service protection early, a full year ago.

To be unaware that one's words tap into a monumental fear that exists in a portion of the electorate -- a fear that Obama's race could get him killed -- is an unusual mistake for a serious and highly disciplined presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. i haven't really slowed down to
really consider the scope of this whole thing.

i knew it was awful on a number of levels when i saw the first subjectline.

but it seems to just keep growing and growing in abhorrence- and here, you point out the fact that obama's security detail had already been beefed up early on, and she still sought to repeat this garbage- it amazes me that anyone is excusing it, or expecting others to just let it go.

at the very least, i would hope people would understand the anger over this. but i have to keep reminding myself that, as crankychatter pointed out, i'm sure it's largely operatives here rolling their eyes and telling everyone to "calm down."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. Very sad that this isn't the first time she said it and esp. after the Huckster
Huckabee made those grotesque comments so very recently at the NRA convention, she should have dropped that reference from her list. I'm still reeling from the Huckster's creepy remarks and would think she was too. That should have been enough to prompt her to drop that reference from her "June campaigns are okay" talking point list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC