Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does the Argus Leader (the editorial board that interviewed Hillary) see the RFK remark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:48 AM
Original message
How does the Argus Leader (the editorial board that interviewed Hillary) see the RFK remark?
The Argus Leader editorial board issued a statement saying, "The context of the question and answer with Sen. Clinton was whether her continued candidacy jeopardized party unity this close to the Democratic convention. Her reference to Mr. Kennedy's assassination appeared to focus on the timeline of his primary candidacy and not the assassination itself."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/clintons-contex.html

How does RFK Jr. view it?

"It is clear from the context that Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June. I have heard her make this reference before, also citing her husband's 1992 race, both of which were hard fought through June. I understand how highly charged the atmosphere is, but I think it is a mistake for people to take offense,” read the statement.

http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080523/UPDATES/80523051
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. it goes beyond that IMO
to a person that has become unfit mentally to serve as POTUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh, how I've missed you in my time away from GD:P
:hug:

I will pray for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. yea I empied out my ignore list
and you oozed back in...thanks I could use any prayers. Hey while you're at it pray for Hillary's mental stability, clearly she needs them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Such anger from such a young person
Perhaps you should try meditation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm not young
and I don't do drugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Drugs? What are you talking about? I suggested meditation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. yes you did
I mis-read it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. But John McCain's had FOUR bouts of skinn cancer since 2000.
That should medically disqualify him, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. After Cheney, can ANYTHING disqualify anyone on medical grounds
for running for president or vice president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Please remember to check for duplicate posts. Also remember: People can have differing opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's right, nobody has been duplicating a thing here for 24 hours
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Where is there a reference to the Argus Leader statement?
If I missed it being previously posted, my bad.

And yes, I'm aware people have different opinions.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6103843
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. RFK's assassination didn't jeopardize party unity
We did quite well at that convention and the following election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. A walk in the park, so to speak...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. But that's a different point
You're discussing whether you agree with Hillary's spin or not. I don't agree with it either. But the fact remains her spin was about candidacies that were active in June. Not about Obama being killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I disagree
There are ample examples she could have used - Reagan/Ford, Mondale/Hart, Carter/Kennedy, Dukakis/Jackson. And even 1968 could have been invoked without referencing RFK's assassination.

There is a historical link between all of the possible analogies she could have used - do you know what that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. She was not trying to raise the specter of assassination
she was, inartfully and stupidly, talking about candidacies that were still active in June. She memorizes talking points, as all candidates do, and these were the exact same talking points she had used before to emphasize her calendar argument.

I don't agree with her spin, because previous campaigns started much earlier, and her husband had the nomination locked in March, though he technically didn't get it until June. So her spin is warped on its face. But she wasn't talking about Obama. She was talking about herself and her campaign. And trying to justify its existence into next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. prolonged battle -> losing?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. She needs to see someone
about her obsession with snipers and assassins. It's not healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lets take a look at RFK jr's response
"Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June"

Ok. That is correct. She cited RFKs assassination in june of 68 as a reason why she should stay in the race. Now apply that to the current race. Who exactly would have to be assassinated for Clinton's decision to remain in the race to make a difference?

Do you need a hint?

Oh, and about "also citing her husband's 1992 race, both of which were hard fought through June" - Bill's 92 race was effectively over in march. So we are left with Bobby's California win, erased by assassination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for trying to bring some sense into this with facts but
it won't work here. BO supporters made up their minds to attack anything Hillary says or does months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC