Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I believe in the forgiveness of sin and the redemption of ignorance."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:25 PM
Original message
"I believe in the forgiveness of sin and the redemption of ignorance."
I'm a lifelong Illinoisan who had the distinct honor and privilege of knowing the late Adlai E. Stevenson II (he and my granddad were good friends), and the subject line of my post is a quotation of his reply to a anti-UN heckler in Dallas TX in November 1963...

Sen. Clinton made a huge gaffe when she referenced Bobby Kennedy's murder in June 1968, no doubt, but it was just that-- a gaffe, a thing done in ignorance, but without malice.

I've done it.

You've done it.

We've ALL done it!

She has apologized (as she should have), so whaddya say let's all just let it go, OK? I accept her apology and am more than ready to move on with the important task of electing a Democrat as President of the United States in November, and I'd like to think that you are, too.

I'll hush up now...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. can we forgive Imus too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I fail to see how the two events are analogous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. figures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Then you don't see too well. I'd get that problem checked out. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes it was a gaffe
But it speaks to the underlying desperation of her ambition, and explains why she has stayed in the race despite the odds.

It was a gaffe saying it IN PUBLIC, but its obvious her campaign has been thinking through all the things that might happen to Obama in justifying her continuing, and the notion of an assassination is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't buy it
I'm a lifelong Democrat. My grandfather knew Tip O'Neill; heck, Tip went to his wake. I don't think either of them, despite being hardscrabble Davis Square pols, would ever put up with this sort of crap.

I don't buy Hillary's apology or her explanation. This is the fourth time Hillary or her campaign has raised the specter of assasination. One time might be a gaffe. When it happens a second, third, and fourth time, it is a deliberate, calculated, cynical, and sick strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. She's exhausted...
Tired people often say really dumb stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The she is unqualified for the job and this proves it.
If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen. Didn't she spout that a few weeks back?

She's tired so she says crazy shit?

Then she is unqualified to be POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sen. Obama said there were 57 states, too.
They're BOTH tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If you want to compare that to this, then you are delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. I'm quite sane, actually. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. i won't question your sanity, but
i will question your basic comprehension abilities and critical thinking skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. 'Critical' is an oddly-appropriate word in this instance, I believe.
It's quite obvious that many posters in GD-P are ever-ready to be critical and/or offended by virtually anything Sen. Clinton says. I'm just not prepared to spend the emotional capital that such a silly reaction requires-- I'm saving my outrage for Sen. McCain and the fall campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. i didn't know
we were designed with a limited and apparently costly capacity for outrage.

i'm perfectly suited to call out dems when they have done wrong, just as i do and will continue to do when it's mccain et al.

i won't go the blind allegiance route. it's akin to nationalism, and just because hillary claims democratic ideals placing a "D" next to her name does not make her infallible and exempt from "criticism."

i have been "critical" of senator clinton, but with the ability to discern between a flag pin and turning assassination into a talking point. this is deserving of criticism even from her supporters- if obama had said it, i would not be defending him right now.

patriotism requires holding those in charge responsible for their egregious "errors," not placing them on a pedestal and patting their backs and telling them it's okay...repeatedly- that's how we ended up in the mess we've been in for the better part of a decade- have you ever talked to a 28%er? eerily similar in terms of loyalty.

sorry. i refuse to give her a pass on this one, and i remain perfectly capable of and eager to deliver the same "criticism" to mccain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. She's been saying it since January
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not a gaffe if you do it over and over and over. And she didn't apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I say 'po-TAY-toe' and you say 'po-TAH-toe' ...
Edited on Sat May-24-08 01:40 PM by ColesCountyDem
I'm and Obama supporter, and I took her 'explanation' as an apology. Wearing sackcloth and ashes isn't a requirement of mine before something can be considered an apology.

I'm hopelessly old-fashioned, I know...

(Edited for a spelling error made because I was tired)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. At no point did I say, suggest, or imply that a "sackcloth and ashes" was required....
for an apology.

Not one single person has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. We must be reading a different thread.
Sen. Clinton never said that Obama would/could be murdered, either, but many, many posters took it that way. Why would it be so odd for me to take many of the replies made here in the same light?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Oh. Then there was no gaffe. And certainly not a gaffe repeated over and over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yotun Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Tomato, not potato...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually, she didn't apologize. She said I'm sorry if you were offended.
Edited on Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM by SoonerPride
An apology includes the words "I apologize" or "I am sorry for what I did"

"I regret you were offended" is not an apology.

Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. See my reply to BlooInBloo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. An apology must include an apology. She failed.
This "I regret you were upset" is not an apology.

See I'm old fashioned too.

She should apologize. For real. And mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. And apologies do not have conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Like a kid who says they were sorry they got caught stealing.
She's not sorry, nor does she even understand WHY what she said is outrageous.

She is unfit for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Once is a gaffe, several times is a talking point
This is part of a very purposeful strategy to justify Hillary's continued campaign
in spite of all possibility that she might win fairly and by the rules;
by seeding doubt and hesitation among the remaining superdelegates that
"something might happen".

It's purposeful, it's transparent and it's wrong.
And rightfully so, it blew up in her face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Before it was code "anythign might happen"
Now it is is revealed as "Obama might get RFKed"
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. no, it was NOT a gaffe.
Edited on Sat May-24-08 01:46 PM by beezlebum
once is a gaffe. twice is a codefying pattern, but perhaps forgivable mistake. three times is a tactic and/or talking point- not a gaffe, do not pass go.

(ht to tblue and bloo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. When "Elected Leaders" do things in ignorance ..... you get things like Invading Iraq...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. I agree , but i have a big but ....
(sorry Pee Wee)

She didn't apologize to who she should have.

She pounced on Kerry's blown joke, she pounced on the "bitter" gaffe and others.

<insert your favorite bad karma metaphor here>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'll agree that it was a less-than-perfect apology.
I've said all along that it was a DUMB THING to say, and I'll admit that she could have done a better job apologizing. Still, if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it's almost certainly a duck.

hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. It is no gaffe..
it is a campaign strategy.
the sky will open, the light will come down, a lightening bolt will strike Senator Obama, and the celestial choirs will be singing my name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. That's your idea of an apology?
Wow, some people here have very low standards indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Some people are willing to forgive, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. A talking point CANNOT be a gaffe
by definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm becoming less and less sure about the redemption of ignorance part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC