Courtesy of my time machine, that allowed me to go back to February 13th and retrieve this footage (
The relevant coverage begins 1:10 into the clip... and the really instructive part starts at 2:20):
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=156701&title=potomac-primariesI decided to undertake this quest after being inspired to look into the matter by the
other thing Hillary said yesterday.
HRC: People have been trying to push me out of this ever since Iowa.
Q: Why?
HRC: I don’t know. I don’t know. I find it curious. Because it is unprecedented in history. I don’t understand it. Between my opponent and his camp and some in the media there has been this urgency to end this. And historically, that makes no sense. So I find it a bit of a mystery.
As you can see, Jon Stewart, back on February 13th, did an excellent job of illustrating the media's bias on this subject. Unfortunately it seems that it has worked in the opposite direction, with the media constantly playing up her chances in the contest and portraying it as a neck and neck race which anyone could win and insisting she was NOT out of the running even while she was racking up a long string of unbroken primary losses, many by landside margins... and we all know how this trend continued through Ohio, and Texas, and Pennsylvania... and all the way until North Carolina and Indiana when the camel's back finally snapped.
As for "her opponent" trying to convey some "urgency to end this"... WHERE and WHEN? EVERY SINGLE statement I have ever seen out of Obama OR his campaign staff has, clearly and without fail, stressed that Hillary is entitled to continue running as long as she wants.
I find this almost as despicable as that other thing that happened yesterday, for one simple reason. This argument that she is now making, trying to tell her supporters and the rest of the country that the Obama campaign and the media have been behaving unfairly to her through the whole campaign and oh she's a poor victim, combined with her ridiculous attempts to continue to tell the voters in Florida and Michigan that the Democratic party and Obama are trying to disenfranchise them when she knows damn well that isn't true, is designed to accomplish one primary objective, and that's to paint Obama's now inevitable victory as somehow illegitimate. This is not a tactic that is in any way designed to somehow give her the nomination, even seating those delegations would NOt accomplish that at this point and we all know it. This is a tactic purely designed to undermine support and enthusiasm for Obama's candidacy going forward into the GE and to throw up a roadblock between Obama and the Clinton supporters and Florida and Michigan voters he needs to being into his camp to win that race, and there are no two ways about it. And I don't buy for one single second that she doesn't know that that's the main effect of these statements.