Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come when a woman does something.......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:49 PM
Original message
How come when a woman does something.......
one doesn't like, she's destroying a whole movement, but a man doesn't harm anybody or anything?

Nice try, third-wave "feminists", but please do try to thank a feminist for all the rights you take for granted whilst you go walking on on that self-righteous, "I hope I'm pleasing some man, somewhere" march.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, girls just don't understand....
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What did you use the gasoline for?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I had to borrow my sister's truck to see a doctor some distance away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thanks.
I am glad you only had to make the one visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Thanks!! We really thought I was in trouble for a while. I'm ok now.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Glad to hear that.
Would be interested in your transportation other than the doctor visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. All bicycle all the time. No car for 20 of the last 25 years.
Oil and oil companies are going to kill us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
67. No more urban sprawl.
Cities designed for people is what are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. lol doesn't it seem like this kitten has 54 posts a day lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
52. Ah...
She's a one-note kitty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you give examples of what you are trying to illustrate with those remarks?
I am not sure I see any parallel with a woman doing something to destroy a movement and a man doing the same thing but not harming anyone/anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I assume this is in response to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Possibly, but I don't see the parallel because Obama's actions and Clinton's actions are not similar
I could start posting video links of her praising McCain but why bother.. we all know the crap she has pulled.

Obama has done nothing similar. So I just don't see how they can be referred to the way the OP did, as if they had done the same thing,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I could be wrong but
I don't think that the OP was saying anything at all about Obama specifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. which is why I asked for examples.... Maybe I over reacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
49. correct me if I am wrong but I seem to remember nothing like this being
said about Chairman Dean-I do remember a few people on a different board speculating that he would bolt the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I seem to recollect a group of me
who ruined the Islamic movement by killing a bunch of innocents. Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. The same arguments happens in other movements.
Environmental extremists are constantly used to discredit all environmental leaders and groups. So no, I don't see a double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ask a conservative what they think of John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. What third wave?
There has been no third wave.
Just an erosion, corrosion, encrustation and morphing of waves one and two.

We are still waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
70. true
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's kind of like a democrat attacking a democrat in a way that leads to the weakening of the party
As a whole... Like in the GE.

Or to be more specific... When a democrat attacks another in a head to head primary race by taking up RW talking points as the torch they carry, and endorsing the Republican opponent as qualified over their Dem competitor, all the while moving the goal posts for their own benefit, and segmenting the party in to groups to pit against each other, and using Rove's map to promote it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Well played, sir/madam. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
54. I like your answer
I'm pretty tired of this sexism/feminism issue in regards to this primary. Sorry, I just don't see how this has turned into a full-blown feminist issue either. For me it's about two candidates. One ran a better campaign than the other. When you don't get your way you don't yell out an "ism". If the role were reversed, and the campaigns ran just as they already have - I would not accept Obama loudly complaining "racism".

I understand feminism as well as the next woman my age. I have lived sexism many times over. It is not pretty. It is terrible. HORRIBLE! It can be what nightmares are made of, seriously. Pardon the crassness: But you work your ass off and get pissed on, with no kind words to soothe your battered soul. That is sexism.

I don't dispute that Hillary may have experienced something during this primary, but I do not believe her losses are due to sexism, or any of the other excuses that have come from her camp. She was over-confident in the beginning, re-grouped too late, then said and did some things she should not have said and done.

Personally, I think she has a wonderful opportunity to move forward as one of the strongest and influential leaders in the Senate. That is if she can get away from some people who are more concerned with their own agenda than they truly are with hers.

Hillary has recently found herself a voice that is mighty powerful. She could do so very much to inspire many young women for generations to come. But more than that, she could influence and touch on every American's life for as long as our Democracy exists. She could be a voice to reckon with for the next 20-30 years - far longer than the limit a Presidency would impose.

I'm sure a lot of people disagree. Yesterday I was told that my thoughts were total bullshit. So what do I know, I'm just a small voice of many.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
64. Rove's Map but Hillary has the
GPS in her pocket to help her follow the map!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. When one is in a leadership role, one embodies the cause that they are leading,
She wasn't running as the first PRESIDENT who happens to be female, she was running to be the first FEMALE U.S. president.

Subtle, but important, distinction there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
47. Exactly!
I do believe many women who support Hillary don't grasp that distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm not sure
but I think it has something to do with cooties.
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I was preparing a serious reply to the OP
Then I read your post. Thank you for the smile. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. You're welcome
Although i have been informed I have a chip on my shoulder about women. Please don't tell my wife!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I had the same reaction to your post as ellacot...
My blood pressure thanks you most kindly:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. :)
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
51. here give me your arm
i know how to immunize you
its gonna sting but never cooties ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Please, Lord, are we up to #3 yet? Please say yes, pretty please with sanity on top.
:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
46. make sure you ask for heavy on the sanity
from one of these guys:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. What is damaging is not what she does, it is the sniveling of her & some of her supporters
when she gets called on the crap she pulls.

IF you want to be taken seriously, to be treated like a grown up equal, you do not make a bunch of lame excuses for screw ups. You do not go about attacking critics with legitimate questions or debate as being sexists.

Constantly resorting to that foolishness shows ya got nuttin and you have no interest in equality or being serious, you just want your way. It is not a mature, thinking woman's way of dealing with life.

Grow up and stop blaming others for what Hillary and her campaign did to themselves, THEN we might stop pointing out how the false claims of sexism, comparing Hillary being treated like any other candidate who fucks up as being 'sent to the back of the bus' or a Holocaust. That shit diminishes the efforts of the Civil Rights Movement, and those who did the brave things of standing up and speaking truth to power. It diminishes the deaths of MILLIONS by claiming the slights to Hillary are on a par.

It destroys credibility and it is not just men saying so. It is a lot of us old women who have been in this fight a hell of a long time, who saw our mothers and grandmothers in this fight and watch our daughters engage in this fight.

It does us no kindness to be used by apologists who will not accept that Hillary is a grown woman who had all the advantages and blew it anyway. It does not make us happy to have such short sighted political opportunists try to hide under the banners we have carried for generations the way bush and his ilk wrapped themselves in the flag as they diminished America.

We won't be used like that without coming at those who try to use us for cover.

Fuck that shit. We work too hard to have a bunch of whiny ass excuse makers run for cover and call others sexist when they are not. We will not stand silent while the likes of the blindly loyal HRC apologists blame her failures on sexists the way McCarthy blamed his own flaws and fears on commies hiding everywhere.

No. Won't let you off the hook for that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Are you talking about the Feminist Movement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Perhaps, when a woman (or more accurately her supporters)
presume to speak for a movement, their actions are taken to be a reflection of said movement. For example, if I (as a woman) wanted to run for an office, let's say president of a large country and ebbing superpower. Now let's say that I was competing with men who had heretofore been the only gender elected to the office of president and at first, I'm the frontrunner and everyone presumes I will win. But somewhere along the way another candidate starts cutting into my lead and I make several big and not so big gaffes....
If my numbers start to drop and I scream "Sexism" while at the same time using racially divisive talking points against my opponent (purposefully or not) and start insisting that rules I had previously agreed to are no longer fair, then I would say that there are some who might use this as a way to say women aren't ready to be president, even though it's not true and even though, on my best days I am everything that the women's movement stands for...

just a hunch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Men destroyed their movement eons ago.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Masculists Unite!!
:rofl:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. Please cut it out with the gender card
I would feel the exact same way about any politician, male or female, who is behaving the way Hillary is right now. I have lost all respect for Bill Clinton, and I think less of him than I think of her.

I actually agree with your second point to some degree. I am a young woman and it bothers me to see some women my age not want to talk about feminism for fear of pissing guys off. But I don't see what that has to do with this campaign. I believe sexism against any female politician is unacceptable and I have tried to call it out here on DU when I have seen it. But I don't believe that the example you cited above has anything to do with gender, and I don't believe that being a feminist means I automatically owe Hillary Clinton my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. after you call out people here with your post
and try to insult, when someone says something insulting in return are you going to run over to the lounge and play victim again?

"Someone called me x or y!:" Come on, Heathers, rally to me!! Someone said something to call me out after I tried to insult everyone who doesn't agree with me! (Oh wait, you leave out that part.) Sexists! Oh, it's so unfair and gd-p is so awful!!! Let me come over here and gossip about it!!!"

Is that your strong feminist stance?

what a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Well...
Hillary has set an example;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. You know what's interesting?
Look at her profile.

Country: Canada

Hobby: messing with convention.


Cute, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. The OP has issues
Watch out that she doesn't send you a threatening PM then put you on ignore so that you cannot respond. She has done it to me and just today two other posters say that she is stalking them via PM as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. You and they should alert on him/her/it. Harassment by PM is against the rules.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. At the time I didn't know that it was against the rules
So I just deleted it but if she ever does it again I will send it to the admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
74. I didn't know Darth Kitten was a stalker
but I'm not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #33
65. don't even bother responding to this particularly insane POS poster
Edited on Sun May-25-08 05:43 AM by ima_sinnic
--she likes hit and run OPs, first of all -- I think the entire board is on her ignore list -- or will respond to certain people individually by PM, with (unfathomably) no repercussions of any kind, she is just allowed to keep doing it, no matter how many of us alert on her stalking-by-PM habit. She is also a Canadian who has never posted anything that is NOT nasty and has a strange fetish about US elections even though she cannot vote in them. Typical NASTY, disagreeable and thoroughly unlikable Clinton supporter boo-hooing about "feminism" and all that other bullcrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Do you have any idea how many good, strong, independent women you're insulting
with this kind of obnoxious crap?

...thank a feminist for all the rights you take for granted whilst you go walking on on that self-righteous, "I hope I'm pleasing some man, somewhere" march.


The more you Clinton partisans post bullshit like this, the more I'm proud that I'm not one of you. If women like you are claiming to represent "feminism", then I want no damn part of it, thank you very much.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh STOP! HRC and her supporters are undermining the position of women leaders -
Edited on Sat May-24-08 10:09 PM by ShortnFiery
Such stereotypically "victimhood" behavior is an embarrassment to truly STRONG women leaders everywhere.

Constantly "playing the victim" reflects poorly on our beloved gender. :nuke:

This woman asks you to CONSIDER:

http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html

It is blame-gaming, whining, a way of not taking responsibility, of not seeing your flaws and addressing them. You want to say "Girl, butch up, you are playing in the leagues, they get bruised in the leagues, they break each other's bones, they like to hit you low and hear the crack, it's like that for the boys and for the girls."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
41. How come this posts sounds like a 6 year old wrote it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
43. Thank you.
I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
44. How come when Hillary Clinton does something wrong and vile, it becomes an issue of feminism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
45. Meanwhile Hillary supporters are threatening to not vote or vote for McCain
Edited on Sun May-25-08 12:09 AM by cbc5g
Which could set womens rights back decades. Perhaps they should inquire with those feminists who fought hard. What would they say about this nonsense? They'd say shut your whining mouth and vote for Obama. Getting someone supportive of womens rights in office is more important than feelings hurt in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
48. If a man does it in the name of some movement, he would be.
The issue isn't even really so much about Hillary. Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot, Hillary was ahead, Obama was trailing, and Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton were leading campaigns threatening to vote for McCain/not vote. Would anyone hear argue that they would be harming the black rights movement? The same applies to those claiming feminism and threatening to support McCain over Obama. And that's in addition to already throwing many staunch allies of women like NARAL and Ted Kennedy under the bus already for refusing to bow down and get behind Hillary. The latter mostly, because it's a classic "cut off your nose to spite your face" tactic.

Look I'm 24. Most of the women I know at my age support Obama and are strong supporters of women's rights, but some are reluctant to label themselves feminists. The reason is basically that Limbaugh and co. have largely been successful in defining the debate and convincing so many young women that they aren't feminists if they shave or wear makeup. This mindset hasn't completely taken over the generation, but the current situation with many of Hillary's supporters aren't changing things. Do you think young women supportive of women's rights are going to want to associate themselves with a movement which tells them they are self-hating misogynists for supporting Obama? And that's not even getting into the ageist shit I've seen so frequently on this forum with so many talking about how the older voters are taking care of the young voters who don't know what's good for them with their support for Obama and so much deragotary attacks on Obama's young supporters. Remember, we are the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Most of my friends are Senator Obama supporters and I ask them why
since I think that he has major flaws as a candidate and I really am worried that people are blowing his ability to get anything done out of proportion.

Most of them outside of agreeing with his positions (which makes sense) cannot show me anything that rests my fears. These are seasons political operatives too that were around in 2004.

I would have and do have the same fears with Senator Clinton since there is nothing that jumps out at me with her actual record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #50
69. what about the recent legislation
co-sponsored with Kerry that funds veterans' needs by closing tax loopholes with the military contractor KBR?

-- this money also targets funding for Americorp/college tuition.

What about the energy initiative to develop alternative industries?

What about the tax plan that helps the middle and lower classes, unlike the republican tax plan in effect and continuing thru McCain that gives money to the haves at the expense of the have nots?

I do not doubt that Obama and EVERY other candidate who will EVER run has flaws and negatives. God god, look at Bush Jr!!! I think that, of the two candidates still in the primary, Obama is the FAR better candidate to get elected and to get democrats downticket elected too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
53. Did obama "threaten" Hillary's life three times?Do his people go on every tv show
and "wonder aloud" about some "catastrophe" befalling her?..grinning from ear to ear.. i-musta-missed it, if he and his are doing this..


It has NOTHING TO DO WITH HER GENDER..IT'S HER EVIL LITTLE BRAIN..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
55. It's not about being a woman, it's about being in the fore front,
being the first. You represent the others, what you do or say can reflect on those who come after. Why is that so hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
56. *yawn*
How original, a bitter, old, bat insulting the younger feminists. Aren't you proud of yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
57. hear, hear. couldn't have said it better. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #57
68. so you are agreeing that if a woman doesn't support Hillary
she's not a feminist? Because that's what that last sentence says, basically.

Or do you agree with the first sentence - that Hillary and her supporters' whining about sexism whenever Hillary screws up doesn't undermine a movement.

--- Those same supporters who repeatedly claim they represent the "women's vote?" .. yet Ferraro cares so little about women's rights she's threatening to vote for McCain and a republican supreme court? -- so that her "leadership" therefore encourages Clinton dead-enders to work to overturn Roe v. Wade? Or is the "women's movement" Emily's List, that attacked NARAL because it choose to support the candidate it did?

I totally agree that Clinton doesn't represent the women's movement. She just pretends she does because it can get her votes. But obviously, if her closest advisers are promoting the idea of voting for the Republican platform, Clinton does not represent the women's movement AT ALL.

She's just another pandering politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
58. If Obama were cryig racism at every turn
I do believe he would be harming the movement for racial equality. It would make a lot of people very hesitant to vote for him and also for the next black person who wanted to run for president. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. He is.
But that's OK. Cuz men are always right, ya know.

Cackle, cackle... stir, stir.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
59. K&R
Good post!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruby slippers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
60. um, Mike Huckabee said it, too....and last I knew he was a man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
62. Don't mind me, I just stopped by this thread to
pad my ignore list!

It was getting rather thin with all the "tombstoning" that has been slimming it down of late!

Now where was I?

Oh yea, Don't support Hillary and you are on a "self-righteous......march"! Yep that's makes lots of sense!

Just remember Darth_Kitten that the original "Darth" worked from the "dark side" of the force!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
63. Gosh and I thought Hillary was trying to be a standard bearer for women...
Guess I was wrong. That is a good thing too because she is screwing up so badly, she would be an awful example to hold up to our young people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamsterDem Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
66. Big difference
Hillary is happy in the role of female role model; she's made many statements drawing upon her femininity to wrangle female votes. Obama is not just a leader of males, but a leader of people (male, female, white, black, etc.). So when someone so embodying the female cause - someone who holds such commanding support amongst women and feminists, someone who's actively sought that support, and someone who enjoys oodles of vocal support from that quarter of the electorate - makes errors and demonstrates flaws, they'll necessarily be viewed as harmful to the cause which they purport to represent or are seen as representing especially if her supporters resort to the kind of behavior that's offending everyone else (i.e. if Hillary is seen as lying, then her supporters who seek to cover for the lie with yet more lies damage the cause by association with and furtherance of what's seen as dishonesty).

It's the same as when Bush messes up - which is admittedly a thousand-fold as compared to Hillary - it reflects poorly on American citizens if it's viewed as us being supportive of or excusing the mistake. He was "elected" (or so he claims) by the American people, therefore his mistakes are at times seen as ours. Her voting bloc is comprised heavily of females, therefore her mistakes will necessarily reflect poorly on those females who support those mistakes (race baiting, Tuzla, assassination gate, etc.) since such a huge portion of her base is female.

Think about it this way. My union is supporting Obama, but they're not overly "gung ho" about it. It was likely a political calculation by Hoffa relating to Obama's poll numbers which had a lot to do with the endorsement. But if my union were totally gung ho for Obama - aligning him with our cause as if he were one of us - then we'd suffer whenever he screwed up because anyone could make the claim that "you guys support a guy who ..." I heard that a ton in 2004, and that was when we supported a white male. There's no sexism in the implication; it's just reality.

I don't think Hillary is damaging the female cause. I think she's damaging her own reputation and the Democratic Party. But that doesn't mean others are totally off base if they see it differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
71. Another Dumb Post About "Feminist Purity"
You give yourself far too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
72. Hillary SIDES with men like Bush and McCain when they smear good Dem vets like Kerry
like John Kerry.

TeamClinton helped SABOTAGE the elections of Gore and Kerry who would have furthered women's rights, but she needed Bush's election to protect Hillary2008, and you think THOSE actions against women and Dem issues was fine the last 8years, so it could APPEAR a strong woman would rescue our causes, completely oblivious to how she and her husband protected BushInc so actively since the 90s and throughout the last 7 years of Bush2.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
73. speaking of self-righteous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC