Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The only pundits defending Clinton's assassination comments are...wait for it...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:38 PM
Original message
The only pundits defending Clinton's assassination comments are...wait for it...
Fox News.

I guess her repeated appearances on their network has worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. sorry that just isn't true
I watched MTP today and two of them did defend as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I watched MTP too
and didn't see much defense of Clinton. Who defended her undefendable remarks? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice-9 Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Which two on MTP defended them?
I'm listening to MTP as I'm typing this (on tivo, since I didn't wake up until 12 p.m.!), and I don't really hear any of them defending her comments. They all seem to agree that the intended meaning of what Senator Clinton said was simply that primary contests have frequently gone to June. But that's not much of a defense given that (1) the statement "primary contests have frequently gone to June" is disingenuous as a historical matter; and (2) whatever Clinton meant, her choice of words was terrible and reflected a political naivety that is simply astounding for someone who claims to be the more seasoned and experienced candidate. So nothing I'm hearing on MTP really qualifies as a "defense" of what Clinton said.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Here's the transcript.. and I just posted excerpts. I saw no defense.
Edited on Sun May-25-08 01:11 PM by K Gardner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. hate to say this but the transcript is not always the same
they "airbrush" it later, I saw the Newsweek pundit defending her on the show, it was a "gaffe" not intentional, blah, blah, blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. maybe I saw a different one
who knows, the one I saw was comprised of totally of pundits this week with Timmie, there were no interviews per se just the roundtable, I remember Gwen Iffel from the Newshour was there, they had a representative from Newsweek, (he was the one that defended Hillary) and there were at least two others, (oh, one of the others was the historian that wrote on Lincoln). I saw David Brooks on the NewsHour on Friday night, defending her with
it was just exhaustion spiel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. She also blamed the Bosnia gaffe on "exhaustion."
I thought the whole premise of her campaign was being ready to respond to 3am phone-calls? How can she do that effectively when she makes so many mistakes when she's tired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. well, yes, and then she doesn't apologize
saying something like "If I traumatized people with my remarks..."

here's some quotes defending her from David Brooks, (NewsHour/PBS) and MTP

DAVID BROOKS, Columnist, New York Times: .. and then we've got Hillary Clinton with the RFK thing. And my own personal belief is she didn't mean it. She was talking about June. She stumbled into the assassination thing. She didn't mean anything by it. You know, she says 100,000 words a day like all the candidates.

I basically think there's nothing to it, doesn't reflect any real views of any of the three what happened today.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june08/brookshields_05-23.html

MR. RUSSERT: Robert Kennedy's son, RFK Jr., issued this statement: "It's clear from the context that Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June. ... I understand how highly charged the atmosphere is, but I think it is a mistake for people to take offense."

MR. MEACHAM: (Newsweek)...But I think this is a great example of what our colleague Michael Kinsley called a gaff in Washington. It's when someone tells the truth by accident, and I think this is exactly what Maureen and Gwen were saying. It's not that she wishes him bodily harm, it is that she is counting on cataclysm.

MR. MEACHAM: (Newsweek) Senator Clinton can run until Labor Day if she wants, you know? No, no one's--she keeps talking about people forcing her out. It's a democracy. She's running, she's winning the popular vote, God go with her.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24815500/page/2/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. She's ready at 3 a.m.
It's 7 EST that's giving her trouble.


:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. That is simply false. Which, when I consider the source, isn't surprising. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. David Brooks defended her and there were some on MTP
Edited on Sun May-25-08 12:40 PM by MissWaverly
oh, it was just exhaustion and she HAS more popular votes lie.-MTP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. exhausted from a full night of sleep, on her first of three events,
in the morning. Uh huh. Yeah, she was too tired to know what she was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. What's her excuse for the other two occasions in which she stated it?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Good thing she wasn't saying that shit on that 3am phone call.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I have been thinking that too
the campaign trail is much easier than being President where you have to go eyeball to
eyeball with foreign leaders, many of whom would rather spit in your eye than talk to you.
She does not have the inner core, the leadership qualities to be prez. She has the same
I pity me quality that Nixon had which is never a good personality trait for a prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yeah, MTP shouldn't have let the "popular vote" lie slip by
Edited on Sun May-25-08 12:45 PM by ErinBerin84
the Newsweek guy. But that was also the Newsweek guy who was trying to tell us that McCain is nothing like Bush. MTP was good today. They said that Hillary obviously didn't wish Obama bodily harm, but it was at the least a faux pas to use the word assasination. And presidential scholar Doris Kearns Goodwin smacked down the intellectual dishonesty of both the "my husband didn't get this nomination until June" and the RFK comparison being inappropriate since the primaries started in March. George Snuffy, who obviously worked for the Clinton campaign in 92, also said that Hillary's logic on the Bill Clinton/June comparison was "pure silliness". Heh, George Will also used the "Hillary was fatigued" excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Amen to that MissWaverly
I am exhausted to my core!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. read Right is Wrong
What is needed is not the Left Take on this or the Right Take on this but just a simple
this is not what a politician should say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. The right wingers are defending hilary like
they defended bush for 8 years..with lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. well, say she was tired well then
she is never going to be tired at the G8 conference or at 3:00 am for the famous phone
call or when there's another earthquake, flood or hurricane in this country or around the
world that needs dealt with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was hoping the Sunday shows wouldn't beat it to death
because the sooner this topic goes away, the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I take no joy in any gaffegates. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. This one in particular isn't an idea we need floating around, in especial.
Edited on Sun May-25-08 01:18 PM by sfexpat2000
I don't mean we shouldn't talk about here. But it was sort of a relief that it wasn't repeated over and over again this morning on the talk shows.

edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. is there some reason you feel the need to use the word assassination in your thread title?
is it really necessary or are you hoping to get replies by using an inflammatory word?

Be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Exactly, why use her words ?? That is really weird..
Edited on Sun May-25-08 03:02 PM by Bensthename
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. I think that your indignation about that word would be best directed at Senator Clinton. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. I saw Chris Wallace this morning and he looked incredulous and Terry McAuliffe's
spin. I don't think he is buying the b.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Chris Wallace Has Half A Brain
and anyone with half a brain ain't buying McAwful's numbers, spin etc....Although he was right on about the "anything can happen" statement. Anything did happen, only it happened to his candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I actually have begun to feel sorry for him
lately he's been acutely uncomfortable like someone waking up from a hypnotic trance,
the spin is wearing off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. LOL!
:D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC