Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lanny Davis' solution for Michigan: Give Hillary 101 pledged delegates to Obama's 27

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:14 PM
Original message
Lanny Davis' solution for Michigan: Give Hillary 101 pledged delegates to Obama's 27
So basically punish Obama for taking his name off the ballot by giving Hillary 101 of Michigan's 128 Delegates.

:rofl: :rofl:

A possible solution

So what is the fairest solution for the Rules Committee, taking into account Michigan's and Florida's willingness to revote but for the failure of the Obama campaign to sit down and work out details to solve their "concerns"?

It is rather simple. Go back, in effect, to the status quo ante and make some reasonable and fair adjustments.

In Michigan, Clinton received 55 percent of the vote. According to Thegreenpapers.com, she thus should receive 73 pledged delegates based on that percentage.

What about the 50 remaining uncommitted delegates, and 7 collectively cast for Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, who were also on the ballot?

Some of those 50 delegates might have been for Clinton as a second choice to candidates other than Obama, so it would be totally unfair to award all 50 delegates to Obama.

One little known fact: Clinton complied with party rules by allowing her name to remain on the ballot, as did Dodd and Kucinich. Obama was not forced by party rules to remove his name — he chose to do so.

The Rules Committee has several options. The fairest would be to allocate those 57 pledged delegates, to Clinton and Obama by the same ratio of their standing to one another in the average of the most recent Michigan statewide polls prior to the Jan. 15 primary. Or perhaps one Solomonic compromise, more generous to Obama than to Clinton, would be to divide the remaining delegates approximately 50-50 between the two of them, 28-27 (giving Clinton the extra delegate since she led in all the latest statewide polls prior to Jan. 15).

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10614_Page2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is an improbable solution.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hola Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. No logic
Even Hillary will be hard pressed to understand why she should get uncommitted delegates since her name was on the ballot. What's next give Kucinich and Gravel uncommitted delegates too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. You could empty a State hospital's pharmacy shelves and still fall well
short of an efficacious dose to quell Lanny Davis' refractory psychosis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Clinton camp has determined they need to make untrealistic demands
......so they have an excuse to try and keep it going until the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. If FL & MI Democratic party accept DNC compromise, Hillary has no case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. True...... but Hillary's supporters are in control of those state's party
They can stall if Hillary wants them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. But, are they nuts??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RooferDem Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lanny Davis broke my heart in the fall of 1983.
He told me what the real meaning of the word "crapulent" was. It broke my heart.

Also, he has very many fine pinstriped suits and a fantastic haircut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And the meaning is???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, the DNC did request names be removed
By requesting candidates neither campaign or particiapte, the request to remove names was made.

Lanny Davis is another one I'll never look at as anything other than another Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh type, along with all Clintons, Carville, Bartcop, and a ton of other assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary will not get more than 55% of the Michigan delegates, if that.
Lanny Davis suffers from the lack of oxygen which naturally results from having his head stuck up Bill or Hillary's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a 'tard.
People in MI who wanted to vote for Clinton already had the option to do so. Could you imagine Kerry arguing that since Bush has become less popular since his re-election, we should switch presidents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanTex Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. "some reasonable and fair adjustments"
Wow. This might be the silliest example of "Clinton math" yet. The chain of twisted logic is two whole pages long!

Don't these people realize that you can't propose 10 different ways of counting the votes, and then claim that each one of them is the "fairest"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Id say you should split them as they have split "stragglers" so far
Edited on Mon May-26-08 06:40 PM by dbmk
Which would be 80-20 in Obamas favour, give or take.

IF it were to go along those lines that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. The 69-59 split seems to be the most likely outcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. more than what she actually earned?
what is this? affirmative action candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Your wrong on the name removal it was part of the pledge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Democratic_primary,_2008

The decision of the DNC diminished the significance of the Michigan primary.<5> On October 9, 2007, following Michigan's breach of DNC rules, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, and John Edwards withdrew from the Michigan Democratic Primary ballot.<6> Dennis Kucinich unsuccessfully sought to remove his name from the ballot.<7> Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd decided to remain on the ballot.<8> Although Clinton said she would honor a pledge that she and the other Democratic candidates had earlier made to refrain from campaigning or participating in Michigan,<8> Clinton and Dodd drew sharp criticism from Biden, who stated that the two candidates had "chosen to hedge their bets" and had "abandoned Democrats in Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina" by staying on the ballot.<8><9>


Here is what the pledge said

... I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, pledge

I shall not campaign or participate in any state

which schedules a presidential election primary or caucus before Feb. 5, 2008, except for the states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as “campaigning” is defined by rules and regulations of the DNC.


The only way to not participate is to remove your name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. This seems fair to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymakeragain Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. hehehe, good one.
You're joking right? If there were ever a flawed primary election it was that one. The whole thing should be thrown out and re-voted with Obama on the ballot and campaigning allowed. If no re-vote, then shit can it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hillary and her people were pushing for a revote months ago
Obama killed the idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Lanny Davis is a friggin crack head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. These people are fucking crazy...
she is sounding more and more like Bush everyday..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. Lanny is a vile, creepy little leprechaun..ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. They take a lot of acid in the Clinton campaign, don't they?
That's one of the most tortured, twisted rationales for awarding bad behavior ever.

You don't get to that level of incoherence without the aid of good drugs.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC