Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Predictions for Saturday? (MI/FL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:38 PM
Original message
Predictions for Saturday? (MI/FL)
Not what you WANT to happen, what do you think WILL happen? (Not including appeals/lawsuits)

My prediction:

MI: 55-73, full w/ Supers

FL: full w/ Supers


No flames please, just predictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want the compromises forwarded by each state to be accepted
Edited on Mon May-26-08 07:03 PM by Johnny__Motown
that would be a 59-69 split in MI and the 1/2 delegate solution in FL

Unfortunatly each state would still be given full SDs. I would like to see the SD punished more than the voters but it won't happen


http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/05/fl-mi-by-numbers.html #4 in this list



anyways, I will predict that the compromises are accepted. a net 28 for Hillary cutting Obama's lead in pledged delegates to 133 (still insurmountable)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I'd go for those, just to get it over with as an issue.
But I would also like to see the Superdelegates cut in half in both states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. So would I, but the OP asked for what I thought would happen, not what I wanted to happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can I have some of what you are smoking???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. I just want this to be over.
This compromise gives Hillary more then she deserves but shows that Obama is the clear winner. Plus, allotting Obama the 238,168 uncommitted votes kills Hillary's popular vote complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. ENFORCE THE AGREED UPON RULES!!!!
No more goalpost moving.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I woul d like to see Supers from both states stripped
but I know that won't happen. They will protect the very ones who got them into this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The compromises won't move the goal posts, just the ball, And still way out of field goal range
Edited on Mon May-26-08 07:42 PM by Johnny__Motown
besides, she is down by 4 TDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Maybe 5 td's... I still wnat them punished. They might cost us this
presidential election and I think those responsible should be stripped of any status they might have. Malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. I agree, but again.. the OP asked for what I thought would happen, not what I wanted to happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Predict Democracy wins
not Obamocracy.

I'll be in DC at the meeting to make sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Man, you should be ashamed of yourself.
and I'm sure that you actually are, once you remove your hardhat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. At or outside banging a wooden spoon against a soup pot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I agree.
I do not want an "Obamocracy" nor a "Hillatocracy."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Maybe Mcauliff can give you a refund.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. "I'll be in DC at the meeting to make sure."
Perhaps someone should warn the Secret Service. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. don't forget your visual aids


BTW you do realize that Obama is so far ahead that even if Hillary gets all the delegates her way, including none for Obama in Michigan (which no one agrees should happen) that she will still have to get 72% of the superdelegates to win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Guys (and ladies) please; I said no flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary gets all the delegates from Michigan and Florida is seated as is.
Just kidding. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Michigan might go 59/69 for Hillary, and Florida will have its delegates receive half votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. MI 59-69 full vote + supers, Florida half-vote as recorded + supers.
Net gain of 28 for Mrs. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Both states 50/50
Edited on Mon May-26-08 06:56 PM by rocknation
The DNC's hands are tied--anything else legitimizes what they say was a illegitimate vote.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. NYT article on May 15
said there were three options on the table:
1. Seat MI/FL as half delegations.
2. Seat MI/FL in full but with a half vote each.
3. Michigan was likely to propose seating 75% of it's delegation.

I think that both MI/FL will be seated with a half vote each with full votes for the supers unfortunately. I agree with the other posters here. 28 or so net delegate gain for Senator Clinton. Not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Less than a full vote victimizes the voters--again.
Punish the real villains--the superdelegates--by reducing or stripping them of THEIR votes.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. If they give the uncommitted Michigan vote to Obama, I agree with you
Otherwise, it victimizes the voters in Michigan who couldn't vote for Obama because he wasn't on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. The people who did not vote because they were told no delegates were at stake also need to
be considered.


Hillary said the vote would not count for anything. Some people in MI even crossed over and voted in the Repug primary.


Counting the votes as if none of this ever happened is just plain wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Here are the "metrics" the DNC's ruling has to meet:
- preserves their authority
- doesn't disenfranchise the voters of FL/MI
- rewards the states that obeyed their rules
- rewards the MI/FL voters who didn't vote because they were told their votes wouldn't count
- punishes the people who disobeyed their rules
- discourages other states from breaking the rules
- seats the delegates in way which acknowledges that people voted (though they were warned their votes wouldn't count)
- doesn't give either candidate an advantage (since the DNC warned everyone involved that the votes would not count)

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Thank you, rocknation..
they can't go back and rewrite history just 'cause hilary whines and bil wags his finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. My prediction here.
RBC enforces the rules, punishes both FL and MI for moving up the primaries too early - removes ALL supers, but allow half-votes for both MI/FL to be cut down equally 50/50, giving Hillary absolutely nothing.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ultimately it won't matter
If she gets all of MI, and FL is seated as is, she is still behind. There is no way she is going to get all of MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama and Co... CHEATED in BOTH states!!!
ZERO for the CHEAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Really?
how so? I am looking forward to supporting credible links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. No, Clinton is trying to cheat in both states.. but I do agree with your final statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. What keeps Indimuse off ignore: Pure Comedic Value.
Your posting is always good for a laugh. Thank you for the stand up. When's the next show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. I see. Precisely how did he cheat?
By not putting his name on the ballot in Michigan? I would like to hear some facts from you, not assertions posted in all caps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Guys (and ladies) please; I said no flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. The results of the contests, reduced by half
they'll seat half of Florida. The Florida appeal didn't even ask for the whole delegation in their appeal, only 50%.

I think that they'll give 50% of Michigan's delegates to Clinton and 40% to Obama, reduced by half.

I think that they will seat all of the supers for each state. I don't think they *should* seat any, but getting themselves seated is what the supers will fight for hardest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. MI = 50/50 split. FL=50% vote value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. Given rationality prevails
MI 59-69 (no supers - they are the ones who violated the rules)

FL 50% (no supers - they are the ones who violated the rules, and then sued the party) (and this only if Geller & Co dismisses his lawsuit with prejudice.)

Finding of fact that the contests were unsanctioned and that the vote totals are irrelevant to the nomination process.

a very modest and irrelevant gain for Hillary.

My preference, as a Florida voter, allow the states to send their full slate as non-nominating contest "representatives". They get to go to the convention, sit in on the committees and cast zero votes for the nomination in prime time. I would prefer that Geller and the rest of the FL Dem idiots who screwed this up be fully embarrassed with prime time coverage. Perhaps we will then get some new leadership down here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'm thinking it will be slightly different
Michigan 59 -69 full with supers
Florida full with supers

Of course, your scenario is possible - give Clinton a victory, allowing her to withdraw gracefully, saying she has what she wanted, and allowing for party unity. That might happen if Obama already has enough superdelegates in the bag to win with FL and MI seated as-is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Gators will win by one touchdown in OT
The Wolverines will blow the lead, sending the game into OT.

Or:

Florida:
Clinton – 53 pledged delegates
Obama – 34 pledged delegates
Edwards – 4 pledged delegates
Unpledged – 2 add-on superdelegates (other SDs won't be allowed a vote)

Michigan (if it is counted at all):
Clinton – 32 pledged delegates
Uncommitted – 32 pledged delegates free to choose, but 90% of them will end up going to Obama
Unpledged - 3 add-on superdelegates (other SDs won't be allowed a vote)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. They have to go 50/50 for both states or....
... an equal percentage based on the number of delegates they each have w/o these two states.

This would ultimately be almost the same as enforcing the agreed upon rules, because it would not change the outcome. The only difference is delegates would be seated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. All will count for half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. Dolphins 16, Lions 3
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC