Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Guide To Undisciplined Messaging - Politico

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:45 PM
Original message
A Guide To Undisciplined Messaging - Politico
<snip>

The furor over Hillary Rodham Clinton’s reference to Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination is just the latest flap in a presidential campaign that has at times seemed to careen from gaffe to gaffe. Sometimes it’s a loose-lipped surrogate capturing attention with an insensitive remark, other times it’s the candidate inserting foot in mouth. Either way, the result tends to be damaging — even if the comment itself was innocently intended.

Indeed, the problem has become so pronounced in both parties that Republican officials, worried about a general election campaign marked by verbal blunders that leave the party vulnerable to charges of racism or sexism, have coined a term for it — “undisciplined messaging.”

So, in an effort to protect politicians of all stripes from the hazards of ill-considered statements, Politico offers its own Guide to Undisciplined Messaging, a list of dirty words or phrases that have already surfaced in this campaign but are better left unsaid.

“Sweetie”

Gaffe: While touring a factory in Detroit, Barack Obama was asked a question by a local female television reporter. “Hold on a second, sweetie,” he replied. “We’ll hold a press avail.”

Explanation: If your grandfather uses a term to describe the opposite sex, that should be a warning sign that it’s a bit outdated. And it doesn’t matter if you affectionately refer to your wife, significant other, or daughter that way.

“Hard-working Americans, white Americans”

Gaffe: In an interview with USA Today, Clinton questioned Obama’s support among "working, hard-working Americans, white Americans."

Explanation: If you can envision white supremacist David Duke using the phrase, it’s safe to assume it’s inappropriate for mainstream political discourse. As one of her strongest supporters, Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, delicately put it, the remark was “the dumbest thing she could have said.”

“Tar baby”

Gaffe: Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney both drew unwanted attention for referring to a difficult situation as a “tar baby.”

Explanation: The derivation of “tar baby” isn’t explicitly racist — it was originally just the sticky doll used to catch Br’er Rabbit in Joel Chandler Harris’ turn-of-the-century folktale. But over time the term has come to have unpleasant racial connotations, so avoid it altogether.

“Boy”

Gaffe: Speaking about Obama at the Northern Kentucky Lincoln Day dinner last month, Rep. Geoff Davis (R-Ky.) said of the senator: “I'm going to tell you something: That boy's finger does not need to be on the button.”

Explanation: There are many ways in which a politician could use the word “boy” and not self-immolate. But not when directing it in a condescending fashion toward an African-American presidential candidate.

“Cojones,” etc.

Gaffe: Introducing Clinton to an Indiana crowd before the Democratic primary there, a local labor leader spoke of her “testicular fortitude.” He wasn’t the first to make reference to this anatomical impossibility in regards to Clinton — James Carville told ABC’s "Nightline" that if Clinton gave Obama “one of her cojones, they’d both have two.”

Explanation: If it’s the kind of word you wouldn’t say in polite company, then you certainly shouldn’t be saying it into a microphone or in any circumstance where it might end up on YouTube. The word “toughness” will do just fine here. Best to keep it above the belt.

“Pansy”

Gaffe: Democratic North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley tells a crowd that Hillary Clinton “makes Rocky Balboa look like a pansy.”

Explanation: If it can be construed as gay-bashing, it almost assuredly will be construed as gay-bashing. So, unless you’re talking about the flower, pansy is a no-go on the campaign trail. You can’t use it to mean “effeminate” or “weak.” Not anymore. The word has been explicitly condemned as a derogatory gay slur for decades and implicitly known as one for centuries. Gay blogs immediately latched onto Easley’s seemingly innocent comment, demanding that Clinton renounce it. Also out: fairy, fruit, nancy and, note to Gov. Bill Richardson (D-N.M.): “maricon.”

Fatal Attraction

Gaffe: Rep. Stephen I. Cohen (D-Tenn.) evoked the notorious film Fatal Attraction to describe Clinton’s intention to remain in the presidential race. Speaking to a local Tennessee television station, Cohen opined, “Glenn Close should have stayed in the tub.”

Explanation: It hardly needs to be said that equating Clinton with a bunny-killing cinematic psychopath doesn’t do justice to her or to the historic nature of her campaign. And it’s a good way to piss off your female constituents.

“Articulate”

Gaffe: Examples, usually involving Barack Obama, are too numerous to mention. Not quite a cringe-worthy gaffe yet, but rapidly moving in that direction.

Explanation: Yes, Obama is articulate. But so are scores of other white politicians who are not regularly referred to as articulate. Calling him “articulate,” even by way of a sincere compliment, is premised on a stereotype, so it’s best avoided. For the record, as Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) learned the hard way, “clean” is not an acceptable alternative.

Any assassination reference

Gaffe: In an interview with the Argus Leader editorial board last week, Clinton said: “You know, my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.” The week prior, former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee made a fatuous joke about Obama getting shot at during a speaking engagement hosted by the National Rifle Association.

Explanation: Even in jest, assassinations are not funny. And in Clinton’s case, regardless of what she meant, the remark caused a minor political tremor precisely because the topic is so sensitive.

<snip>

Link: http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=273FA58D-3048-5C12-0031522FE0F94F46

Words matter...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. politico admits jumping the assassination story too soon
They picked it up from another source, and were dismayed when they saw the video, seeing that it was inflammatory when taken out of context, but not so much when the whole things was viewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. True... And I Wonder How Much Of It Is A Generational Thing...
like so much else this year.

I'm pretty sure that if Hillary had referred instead in some way to the McKinley or Lincoln assassinations, it wouldn't have had the same impact.

But many of us here, and throughout the blogosphere, and throughout the entire country, lived though those devastating moments in time.

AND SO DID HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON!

We just passed one 40th anniversary assassination, and are almost to the second one.

And Ted Kennedy just got diagnosed with a possible death sentence a few days ago!

So HRC, is either the stupidest, forgetfullest, or manipulativest candidate for President I've seen in recent memory.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. What You Said
i agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. So the "Tanya Harding" option is still valid?
With apologies to Tonya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck Politico.
I don't trust 'em at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hey Frenchie... The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly...
Just like here.

I like to take it all in, and think for myself.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do you know when the "sprung" up? And where they came from?
This politico?

Because the more we use them as a newsource, the more we are setting ourselves up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah... And I Watch Then Just The Same As I Do Time, Newsweek, WaPo, NYT...
ABC, NBC, CBS...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes......that is the accurate category to put them in......
also Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Words do matter very much.
Edited on Mon May-26-08 07:58 PM by IndyOp
I cannot, though, put "sweetie-gate" - although admittedly offensive - on the same par as the mention of Bobby Kennedy's assassination.

To be clear, I take very definite umbrage about "sweetie" and the use of the term "cahones" to mean courage and any mention of Glenn Close's psychopathic female character as analogous to Clinton's refusal to suspend her campaign.

Even though I do not think Clinton "meant anything by" mentioning Kennedy's June 1968 assassination - the possibility of assassination is worse than the possibility of sexism or racism -- boy? I am relieved to see it was an R who used that term.

:(

On edit: Clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary MEANT what she said
Rachel Maddow has been screaming for people to believe that Hillary means
what she says. (Rachel was talking about Hillary's promise to take primary to the convention).

Eugene Robinson calmly said on MSNBC that Hillary was saying what she meant regarding the
assassination. She is hoping that Obama is destroyed so she can take his place, since
that is the only way she can get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. There were a million better ways to make that point
and none of them involve Bill Clinton or RFK. That was her worst sin, tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, I remember all of these..the one I think
that is trying to be too PC is the "articulate"..because not everyone is and Obama has the gift.

It wasn't the first time hilary used the "RFK assassination in June" reference, gratuitiously, on Friday but I bet it's going to be the last time she opens her ghoulish mouth about that particular talking point of hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC