Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama caused the release of Hillary's RFK gaff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:07 PM
Original message
Obama caused the release of Hillary's RFK gaff
A relative of mine explained tonight that the media would have been unaware of Hillary's campaign strategy statement if Obama's camp had not leaked it.

I'm positive that I read the press corps covering Hillary in the field didn't hear the comment because the Internet connection on their bus was so bad that they couldn't watch the editorial meeting. My retaliative only believes media sources which were in existence two generations ago, anything newer isn't credible.

Is there a "mainstream" media time line that confirms the web-cast of the editorial meeting which verifies that Hillary's words were out regardless of whether Obama's campaign pointed them out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The NY Post had an article on it and Obama's staff forwarded that to the other media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Is that the same as Obama's campaign originating
it? I'm just venting here, but recirculating an opponents gaff is plain politics, it's not unfair, even if that's what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Like it's ok if they go around planting assassin seeds as long as not many
har the dog whistle..or report on it :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. thats not true NYPost was blogging it and it went directly to Drudge
there was an article about it today where a Post corespondent was watching it happened and on reflection thought that they may have jumped to soon. In any case there was no Obama involvement. Next time bring a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Its straight from HillaryForum...therefore, no linkiepoo. And hey, STOP TELLING THE TRUTH.. you
confuse them with factoids. Sheesh, Grant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Can't make a stinkie-poo if there's no linkie-poo!
Words to live by...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. No, NY Post had an article that was picked up by Drudge
Obama's people responded to the NY Post article.

If it had hit Drudge and the NY Post it is fair to respond to it even if responding to it requires you to quote what you are responding to.

Here's the NYTimes article about how it "spread."

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/on-the-road-clintons-very-bad-day/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Uh, read the NYT account...From NY Post to Drudge and all major media checks out Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. Do you have a source that states Sen. Obama's camp forwarded anything to anyone,
Edited on Mon May-26-08 09:28 PM by Window
besides the campaign's response?

snip

"On the other end were editors who had seen a Drudge Report link to a New York Post item online. The Post was not with the traveling press — and apparently had a decent Internet connection."

The initial N.Y. Post item read this way: “She is still in the presidential race, she said today, because historically, it makes no sense to quit, and added that, ‘Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June,’ making an odd comparison between the dead candidate and Barack Obama.”

snip

By then, the Obama campaign had issued a statement, linking to the Post item and saying her comment “was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign.” Privately, we were told, the Obama camp was livid.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/on-the-road-clintons-very-bad-day/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. That is not what I heard. I heard that Obama campaign forwarded
Keith Olberman's remarks about Hillary to the media. David Alxerod did not deny that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. KO's remarks came waaaay later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. Where is the link, and I want the link to give who on the staff did it
not some nameless bullshit, like most of the other things getting spewed around


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. You might check the Argus website to see if there is a posting time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh Bullshit..like I believe anything a hilary whiner
was passin' off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. You realize you just said the word "webcast", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama has spies everywhere!
It's a conspiracy!

Maybe it really wasn't Hillary at that interview. Maybe it was Obama in a disguise. Dressed up like Hillary. Then he said something really stupid and leaked it to the media.

GOtta hand it to Hillary, she has one over active imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. The AP Reported It
There wasn't an Obama rep in the room to witness it so. Next it'll be said they forced the words into her mouth and mind, 3x.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Yup. Blame the victim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. How is Hilary a victim? She is the one who said the words.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good, I hope he did
Payback is a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. I suppose he held a gun to her head and forced her to say that stupid shit too.....
..... Give me a f**king break!! :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. That's what I don't get with this
It's not as if she didn't say it. So the problem is that she said it, and people found out about it?

This wasn't the confessional. This wasn't private communications. She was talking to an editorial board IIRC. Public.

This is a non-issue, IMO. And just an attempt to deflect blame for a major, major reckless gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. The NY Post did the story and Drudge put it on his front page.
And then it was all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was a live and then rebroadcast event on the Argus website
Edited on Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM by asSEENonTV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just wanted to add
that even if he did leak the information it doesn't change the fact that she said it. How Obama leaking it to the press gives Hillary any cover is beyond me; she did say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. It shouldn't change a thing
the statement was fair play, except to victimologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:13 PM
Original message
Obama forced her to say it three times?
Keep it up. Save whatever you're smoking for life under the the McCain administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. Haven't We All Been Told Time & Again
How nothing unplanned comes out of the Clinton campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, considering she was talking to a newspaper at the time, I'd give them that as proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:16 PM
Original message
yep...what a bizarre OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
61. It's a "somebody told me" lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Every move either of them take
is watched, examined, & picked apart, NO INTERVIEW goes unchecked. I do not buy that Obama needed to tell the press about it because they did not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wrong! It was Obama using the power of the crystal skull that made Hillary do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
74. Bwaha! You just came *so close* to owing me a keyboard. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bittergate
Sucks doesn't it...really really sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Sweet revenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Clinton was talking to journalists. On the record.
Run that by your retaliative and see what he thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Drudge 5/23 14:48 EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. What time did she say it
Not that Drudge will help, since, despite his bias, he is "new media."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
26.  it`s never hillary`s fault...really... it is`t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why would the Obama campaign have a better connection than the press?
That makes no sense.

It seems that the feed for the reporters on the bus was bad, but other reporters had streaming access that worked.

e.g.: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/05/24/how-clintons-comments-didnt-then-did-catch-fire/?mod=homeblogmod_washingtonwire

And while a couple reporters — who had managed to stick with the streaming press conference — mentioned that they found her assassination reference slightly strange, few on the trail thought it would be the lead on any of their stories that day.

The fact that it did become big news is illustrative of journalistic competition in the Internet age. The entire pack of reporters sent to watch Clinton’s every move had somehow gotten beat, and forced into following a New York Post reporter who was nowhere near the campaign, but who, apparently, had a much-better Internet connection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Clearly Obama has the WSJ in his pocket ;)
Your link is perfect. It is the sequence I recall, although I doubt it will change any minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. This just in: Obama camp forced Tuzla snipers to remain hidden, use silencers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. FollowUp: Obama Camp Held Chelsea Hostage thereby Forcing Hillary to Purposefully SINK Her
Own Campaign. Person on campaign trail is Chelsea look-alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Ingenious Nigerian email scam drains Clinton campaign funds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. Not a surprise.
Someone on that campaign plays very dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Damn them for reporting Hillary's words
the day she says them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Oh bullshit...you sure believe some anonymous poster
spreading trumped up shit about Obama with some more bullshit of your own you can't back up.

hilary makes her 3 or 4th reference to "RFK's assassination in June" talking point to reporters in South Dakota and somehow this Obama's fault?

No it's not.

<snip>

"From NBC's Mark Murray and Domenico Montanaro
This might not help the Hillary-for-veep chatter... The New York Post writes, "Hillary Clinton today brought up the assassination of Sen. Robert Kennedy while defending her decision to stay in the race against Barack Obama. 'My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don't understand it,' she said, dismissing calls to drop out."

"Clinton made her comments at a meeting with the Sioux Falls Argus-Leader's editorial board while campaigning in South Dakota, where she complained that, 'People have been trying to push me out of this ever since Iowa.'"

Obama spokesman Bill Burton responded to Clinton's remarks. "Senator Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign."

NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli notes that Clinton said something similar the day after the Indiana and North Carolina primaries. "Sometimes you gotta calm people down a little bit. But if you look at successful presidential campaigns, my husband did not get the nomination until June of 1992," she said. "I remember tragically when Senator Kennedy won California near the end of that process."


http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/23/1058940.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. LOL, whatever
Hillary is fair game this is a campaign, sound familiar :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. And if the rolls were reversed, would she do any different?
Like if say.. she was sitting on a couple of tapes of Rev. Wright - she'd just burn those, and not send 'em out to every media outlet in the country?

Please - what she said was pathetic. Her apology was worse - only to the Kennedy's as if she didn't insult Obama just as bad.

And frankly, what's there to release? This was the THIRD FUCKING TIME she's said it. Did his campaign report it EVERY TIME?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
37. Good for him..
... it's about time everyone know what many of us have known for months. HRC will say ANYTHING, stoop to ANY LEVEL, to grab for the 0.01% chance at winning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. Abusers always blame their victim
it's not suprising at all that the Clintons have been trying to spin this as all being Obama's fault. I still don't think they fully get that every single syllable can be reported on within seconds after it's uttered via the internet, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Web spread the News .. The Clintons don't get the Web
and neither do the Bushes. The Clintons are still living in the 90s.
It doesn't come out of one source.


That's why both of them want to control it and oppose a free internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. It's a hard concept for anyone
who doesn't use it to understand, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. It's amazing how out of touch they are n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
45. New York Times good enough?
How many sources needed to prove the newspaper was webcasting the interview live & also had posted it on their website? Since blogs aren't what your're looking for here's a NYT reporter's account who was traveling with the Hillary campaign. The live webcast was not just being spottily viewed by traveling press corps with bad mobile internet connections but also by media folks and others with good internet connections.

NYT report from reporter traveling with Hillary's campaign:

Mrs. Clinton had three events. First was a meeting with the editorial board of the Sioux Falls Argus Leader, which was live-streaming the interview, something a few newspapers just started doing in this election cycle.

The press corps, meanwhile, was on a bus from the airport to Brandon, a few miles away, to set up for her second event at a supermarket. (The media are sometimes in a different place from the candidate, usually when the event is private or small.)

Her interview began while we were on the bus, but Internet access was so poor, we could only pick up bits of her comments intermittently. We did hear her bat back reports that her campaign had made overtures to Senator Barack Obama’s campaign about some kind of deal for her to exit the race.

At the supermarket, we were ensconced in a café off the deli counter, where many reporters were writing about her denying the overtures while also trying to follow the live stream. Here, too, Internet access was spotty and the stream came over in choppy bursts.

Mrs. Clinton arrived from the newspaper in the midst of this, and began addressing a couple of hundred people who were seated adjacent to us, in the fresh produce section. Then our cell phones and Blackberries went off.

On the other end were editors who had seen a Drudge Report link to a New York Post item online. The Post was not with the traveling press — and apparently had a decent Internet connection.

The initial N.Y. Post item read this way: “She is still in the presidential race, she said today, because historically, it makes no sense to quit, and added that, ‘Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June,’ making an odd comparison between the dead candidate and Barack Obama.”

Mrs. Clinton did not make that comparison. Here’s the video and here’s the transcript from the paper’s Web site, though it is not complete.


More at http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/on-the-road-clintons-very-bad-day/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
50. Obama's good at trashing fellow Dems
typical of Dems who spend most of their career in strongly Democratic areas like Chicago. They become very comfortable with running nasty campaigns against fellow Dems, and courting Republicans who help them get the job done.

However, they often owe many favors to GOP'ers who have helped them in their climb up the ladder and usually are ill equipped to run against them in a hotly contested race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
68. Interesting circles
your mind tends to wander in. I was going to suggest that you might want to ease back into reality slowly. However, on further reflection, I don't suspect you are going there at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
51. It does not matter who pointed it out.
It is already out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
52. it was in a newspaper interview!
that's not exactly keeping it a secret. if one journalist read the transcript it would have come out immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
72. The interview was live streamed on the web and they also posted a video of it. And it was a big
news day since reporters wanted to get her response to the reported "campaign in talks" claims.

It's not like no one in the media was watching the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
53. Politico says they got it from NY Post
...and jumped on it immediately, but they were dismayed when they finally saw it in context. Politico says out of context it was inflammatory, in context not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
57. WSJ's account...posters's relative has it all wrong.
Clinton was scheduled to sit down with the editorial board at the Sioux Falls Argus Leader ahead of a campaign event at a Brandon, S.D., grocery store. The Clinton camp’s press people advised reporters that the editorial board meeting would be streamed online where reporters would be able to watch, take notes and report on anything worthwhile.

The press corps was sent ahead to the grocery story, Sunshine Foods, where they ensconced themselves in a reserved café area, picked at pasta salad from the spread, pecked away at their keyboards and tried to watch the Clinton meeting online.

Unfortunately, as sometimes happens out on the trail, the local technology infrastructure didn’t seem quite ready for an influx of heavily wired journalists. Some reporters found the streamed broadcast of the editorial meeting excruciatingly slow, rendering it unwatchable. It didn’t seem that there would be any huge news out of a routine sitdown with the editors of a small-town daily, besides her batting away earlier reports that day that she was seeking to reach a deal with Obama’s campaign as way to exit the nomination race. She did, in fact, tell the editorial board that those reports were “flatly untrue… flatly, completely untrue.”

Clinton concluded her meeting at the Argus Leader and arrived at the supermarket, where a few hundred onlookers assembled in the produce section, when the RFK comments began to reverberate around the Internet.

As the New York senator was delivering her stump speech in the grocery store, reporters began receiving messages on their BlackBerrys from editors wondering about a New York Post story posted prominently on the Drudge Report that referenced the senator’s mention of the assassination.

The bulk of the press corps soon gathered around a Clinton spokesman asking for comments and clarification on the Kennedy quotes. Seemingly taken aback by the direction the questions were going, the spokesman explained that Clinton had merely been trying to emphasize the point that Democratic primary fights had stretched into June in the past.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/05/24/how-clintons-comments-didnt-then-did-catch-fire/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
58. Of COURSE he did...and then he denies it..or acts like "everyone else' is overreacting when HE was
the one stoking the fires. It's been a calling card of his for quite some time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #58
73. An assertion contradicted by reporters who actually got the calls from editors who saw it in NY Post
and Drudge within minutes of the interview which was on a live internet feed. Yeah, the MSM (even the haughty NYT) checks out Drudge for material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
60. So the repeated times that HRC used the RFK meme is Obama's fault?
Holy shit. You. Are. Insane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
62. What the O camp did was send out Keithy's ranting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think the misspelling 'retaliative' for relative in the OP is revealing.
...I'm just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
64. ** You know, if Hillary never made the serious gaff there wouldnt have been a story **
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
66. Obama has control of Hillary's mind! Hillary is Obama's puppet and he makes her do dumb things. (nt)
Edited on Mon May-26-08 10:26 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. No it is more than that.
He has full control of all reality, He is "the one" and he has programmed the Matrix against Hillary. All matter and people everywhere now conspire against her. She is the only one who could ever have saved us, but it is too late, because the Agents have received their programming from Obama central. He is the "emperor" from the star wars movies combined with "the architect" from the Matrix, with a little Darth Vader thrown in for good measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. Gaffe? She said it at least twice before. And the same could be said about "bittergate."
Remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
69. Of course. They're overly sensitive and defensive in the Obama camp.
It doesn't take much to set them off.

Another thing. If Hillary is so irrelevant at this point, why are they still putting so much effort on her and not McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
71. The New York Post heard it on the live feed
and it went from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC