Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Letter To Superdelegates: Full Text

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:40 PM
Original message
Clinton Letter To Superdelegates: Full Text

Clinton’s Letter to Superdelegates

Dear ___________,

The stakes in this election are so high: with two wars abroad, our economy in crisis here at home, and so many families struggling across America, the need for new leadership has never been greater.

At this point, we do not yet have a nominee – and when the last votes are cast on June 3, neither Senator Obama nor I will have secured the nomination. It will be up to automatic delegates like you to help choose our party’s nominee, and I would like to tell you why I believe I am the stronger candidate against Senator McCain and would be the best President and Commander in Chief.

Voters in every state have made it clear that they want to be heard and counted as part of this historic race. And as we reach the end of the primary season, more than 17 million people have supported me in my effort to become the Democratic nominee – more people than have ever voted for a potential nominee in the history of our party. In the past two weeks alone, record numbers of voters participated in the West Virginia and Kentucky primaries. And with 40 and 35 point margins of victory, it is clear that even when voters are repeatedly told this race is over, they’re not giving up on me – and I am not giving up on them either.

After seven years of feeling invisible to the Bush administration, Americans are seeking a President who is strong, experienced, and ready to take on our toughest challenges, from serving as Commander in Chief and ending the war in Iraq to turning our economy around. They want a President who shares their core beliefs about our country and its future and “gets” what they go through every day to care for their families, pay the bills and try to put something away for the future.

We simply cannot afford another four – or eight – years in the wilderness. That is why, everywhere I go, people come up to me, grip my hand or arm, and urge me to keep on running. That is why I continue in this race: because I believe I am best prepared to lead this country as President – and best prepared to put together a broad coalition of voters to break the lock Republicans have had on the electoral map and beat Senator McCain in November.

Recent polls and election results show a clear trend: I am ahead in states that have been critical to victory in the past two elections. From Ohio, to Pennsylvania, to West Virginia and beyond, the results of recent primaries in battleground states show that I have strong support from the regions and demographics Democrats need to take back the White House. I am also currently ahead of Senator McCain in Gallup national tracking polls, while Senator Obama is behind him. And nearly all independent analyses show that I am in a stronger position to win the Electoral College, primarily because I lead Senator McCain in Florida and Ohio. I’ve enclosed a detailed analysis of recent electoral and polling information, and I hope you will take some time to review it carefully.

In addition, when the primaries are finished, I expect to lead in the popular vote and in delegates earned through primaries. Ultimately, the point of our primary process is to pick our strongest nominee – the one who would be the best President and Commander in Chief, who has the greatest support from members of our party, and who is most likely to win in November. So I hope you will consider not just the strength of the coalition backing me, but also that more people will have cast their votes for me.

I am in this race for them — for all the men and women I meet who wake up every day and work hard to make a difference for their families. People who deserve a shot at the American dream – the chance to save for college, a home and retirement; to afford quality health care for their families; to fill the gas tank and buy the groceries with a little left over each month.

I am in this race for all the women in their nineties who’ve told me they were born before women could vote, and they want to live to see a woman in the White House. For all the women who are energized for the first time, and voting for the first time. For the little girls – and little boys – whose parents lift them onto their shoulders at our rallies, and whisper in their ears, “See, you can be anything you want to be.” As the first woman ever to be in this position, I believe I have a responsibility to them.

Finally, I am in this race because I believe staying in this race will help unite the Democratic Party. I believe that if Senator Obama and I both make our case – and all Democrats have the chance to make their voices heard – everyone will be more likely to rally around the nominee.

In the end, I am committed to unifying this party. What Senator Obama and I share is so much greater than our differences; and no matter who wins this nomination, I will do everything I can to bring us together and move us forward.

But at this point, neither of us has crossed the finish line. I hope that in the time remaining, you will think hard about which candidate has the best chance to lead our party to victory in November. I hope you will consider the results of the recent primaries and what they tell us about the mindset of voters in the key battleground states. I hope you will think about the broad and winning coalition of voters I have built. And most important, I hope you will think about who is ready to stand on that stage with Senator McCain, fight for the deepest principles of our party, and lead our country forward into this new century.

http://thepage.time.com/clintons-letter-to-superdelegates/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why did we have all these primaries, again?? why don't we just
nominate by poll??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Need to pick the right poll too.
Not the ones that show Obama ahead of HRC nationally. Just the states where she was ahead. Or the national polls that show her doing better against McCain and not the ones that show her doing worse. And certainly not one where it is clear how much better Obama would do if she would not be encouraging her supporters to abandon the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. More like..
"Why do we have all this primary nonsense anyway. As you know, I'm entitled to the nomination, and it's my turn to get it. I would have had it wrapped up on Super Tuesday, but those pesky voters bought the line of claptrap that Sen. Obama spoke. I need your help to keep this upstart back in his place until it's his turn. Fair's fair, it's my turn and you need to see the light and give me what I'm entitled to!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. On to Denver!
Oh well. I am starting to wrap my head around that eventuality. It is best that we simply drop the infighting and go against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Guess they stopped returning Phone Calls
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. heh heh...
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. Or maybe the Clinton Campaign quit paying the phone bill.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Senator Clinton needs to be shown the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. The trap door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sorry but I couldn't read past "automatic delegates" (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I have a cd changer?? - Is this the same thing as an automatic
delegate???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Same
I stopped there too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That is the actual, technical term. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. cite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Sure.
Edited on Wed May-28-08 01:47 PM by cbayer
The majority of what we call super-delegates are technically called automatic delegates. This is because they get their seats automatically by holding elected positions within the party. There is a much smaller number who are awarded their seats by the party for various other reasons.

I tried to download from DNC site, but my connection is like molasses. I was able to get this article that explains it to some degree.

http://www.reformelections.org/commentary.asp?opedid=1800

edited to add wiki site which says that "superdelegate" is not even a DNC term.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=edit&forum=132&topic_id=6159347&mesg_id=6160092

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Complete Bullsh*t, and here is the proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. On further research, I find the terms "unpledged" and "automatic"
to be those actually used by the DNC. They do not use Superdelegate.

The Clinton campaign has chosen to use automatic, but they are not the first or only group to use that term. The Huffpo piece just said that Ickes requested they used automatic because it was more accurate (which it is). Unpledged is probably even more accurate.

I am sorry you felt the need to call my post complete Bullsh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. He requested they use it because he was trying to sell the notion
of them automatically having to pick someone. This was before they needed them to have to just pick Hillary over the will of their constituents.

It is unfortunate in the process that 99% of the public didn't know the massive number of "Super" delegates in the process until it mattered this year. I agree with Pelosi that we need to cut that number down. I personally would like them to cut it in half. I do see merit to having some though. You need that group to be able to make a solid majority if things get too close and threaten to leave it a huge bickering mess (which we are approaching).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I hope we can agree to disagree on your first point.
I felt the term was being used to indicate that they get their seats automatically and to emphasize that they had no more power or sway than a regular delegate. Either way, I think the term is more accurate.

I agree with your second point. I think there are far too many of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canucksawbones Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. the actual term
according to the DNC charter is "unpledged delegates"

The Clinton campaign made up the automatic delegate term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. I believe, on further research, that you are correct.
Though the word "automatic" is used repeatedly, the term Automatic Delegate is not. The term Superdelegate is also not used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can someone tell Tracy Flick to put a sock in it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh shit, Obama's screwn now!
All the superdelegates are going to cry, salute the flag and change their votes to Hillary! The sky will open...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary: "Give me the nomination or I'll hold my breath and turn blue."
Proceed. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is a very important part of the letter:
"In the end, I am committed to unifying this party. What Senator Obama and I share is so much greater than our differences; and no matter who wins this nomination, I will do everything I can to bring us together and move us forward."

I believe her when she says this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The question is what "end" means
The end of the primaries or the end of the convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It is nice to know
that she is no longer advocating McCain as a better candidate than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I don't believe anything
that spews from her vile mouth or pen.

Hi-liar-y has lied, twisted, distorted, deflected and projected to the point that she is completely untrustworthy.

Remember just as WE 'misinterpreted' her words about the RFK assassination, these 'make nice' words -- similar to those heard at debates -- are not likely what she means!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. This does not surprise me.
Many here have bought into every twisted, distorted, deflected, projected lie about Clinton that has been fed to them by the media and the RW spin machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. nice try
but no media needed, HRC turned this former ardent supporter to an ardent opponent, all by herself, her words and hers actions and it sll started with IWR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. She *has* to say that. She's talking to the Super D's after all.
After they vote against her, and Obama rejects her on the ballot, expect her to make a 3rd party run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. Why do you believe her when she say that?
When everything she's been doing shows a mindset that's the complete opposite of what she says?

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Because I have not bought into the image of her that has been sold
to the public during this primary season. I think she has been massively redrawn as an evil liar who is intent on destroying the party and I don't buy any of that. She has made some errors - they both have. However, she is a Democrat in every sense of the word and I do not believe for a second that she will not do everything she can to see that our Democratic candidate is elected in GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Sold? It's a matter of seeing for oneself
The woman is my senator but I won't delude myself into believing she's a progressive and I certainly won't pretend that she's not run a horrendous campaign.

She's said things that are not only demonstratively false but that she knows are demonstratively false. That is the definition of a liar; although I've refrained from using the "L" word straight out.

If she's willing to do everything she can to see that our Democratic candidate is elected why did she make it sound as though Senator McSame was more qualified than Senator Obama? That's not spin that's the words out of her own mouth.

To paraphrase: "McCain has a lifetime of experience, I have a lifetime of experience, Obama has a speech."

It is one thing to fight hard in order to win the nomination but it is completely unforgivable to use Republican talking points to do so. Senator Clinton is writing McSame's ads for him. And as much as people will say that the Republicans will do worse, I certainly had no illusions of how disgusting the Republicans were going to be in this race. I damn sure didn't expect to hear it from the Democratic rival first. That's inexcusable.

Next, you'll be telling me that the dog whistling is another bill of goods and not something I actually heard or saw and that it's something being fed to me by the media. Don't bother. I know racial code when I bloody well hear it. I don't have the privilege of pretending it wasn't said and for that? No cookie (nomination) for Mrs. Clinton.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. We the people! Obama/44 POTUS!
Yes We Can!


K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. "I expect to lead in the popular vote and in delegates earned through primaries."
Only her math shows she's won the popular vote, and she completely ignores the caucases.

Does she believe the SD's are stupid? I mean, WTF!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Actually, she won the shmopopular vote, that cannot be denied...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. In her first sentence she says "abroad". Sexist!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. I wonder who wrote that heart-tugging piece of nonsense.
An awful lot of "hoping" and "believing" going on there. Maybe the heavens will open up, choirs will sing and Jesus himself will descend and anoint Hillary nominee of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. To sum up her letter...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. "I am dividing us in order to unite us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. where on earth is this from? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. She's wasting her time and everyone else's at this point
Keep wasting Bill's "speech" money, by all means!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. more people than have ever voted for a potential nominee in the history of our party

Ehm,

hate to break this up to you, but there has been one democratic candidate in history that got even more votes than that: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!

She is such a pathetic liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. LOL - how will she be able to "pay the bills"
They want a President who shares their core beliefs about our country and its future and “gets” what they go through every day to care for their families, pay the bills and try to put something away for the future.


She even discounts her own abilities in her letter - she can't pay her own bills, what a fraud, what a grifter ...

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
47. Dear Hillary
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.

Love,
The Superdelegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. When I get junk mail, I just pitch it without opening it...n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. She Makes A Quite Powerful Case There. Gotta Give Her Credit.
Likely won't be close to enough, but she definitely raises some really good points that are worthy of consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC