Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s Lobbyist Connection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:58 PM
Original message
Obama’s Lobbyist Connection
Obama’s Lobbyist Connection
Michael Isikoff
NEWSWEEK
May 24, 2008

When Illinois utility Commonwealth Edison wanted state lawmakers to back a hefty rate hike two years ago, it took a creative lobbying approach, concocting a new outfit that seemed devoted to the public interest: Consumers Organized for Reliable Electricity, or CORE. CORE ran TV ads warning of a "California-style energy crisis" if the rate increase wasn't approved—but without disclosing the commercials were funded by Commonwealth Edison. The ad campaign provoked a brief uproar when its ties to the utility, which is owned by Exelon Corp., became known. "It's corporate money trying to hoodwink the public," the state's Democratic Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said. What got scant notice then—but may soon get more scrutiny—is that CORE was the brainchild of ASK Public Strategies, a consulting firm whose senior partner is David Axelrod, now chief strategist for Barack Obama.

(snip)

But the activities of ASK (located in the same office as Axelrod's political firm) illustrate the difficulties in defining exactly who a lobbyist is. In 2004, Cablevision hired ASK to set up a group similar to CORE to block a new stadium for the New York Jets in Manhattan. Unlike Illinois, New York disclosure laws do cover such work, and ASK's $1.1 million fee was listed as the "largest lobbying contract" of the year in the annual report of the state's lobbying commission. ASK last year proposed a similar "political campaign style approach" to help Illinois hospitals block a state proposal that would have forced them to provide more medical care to the indigent. One part of its plan: create a "grassroots" group of medical experts "capable of contacting policymakers to advocate for our position," according to a copy of the proposal. (ASK didn't get the contract.) Public-interest watchdogs say these grassroots campaigns are state of the art in the lobbying world. "There's no way with a straight face to say that's not lobbying," says Ellen Miller, director of the Sunlight Foundation, which promotes government transparency.

Axelrod says there are still huge differences between him and top McCain advisers, including the fact that he doesn't work in D.C. But his corporate clients do have business in the capital. One of them, Exelon, lobbied Obama two years ago on a nuclear bill; the firm's executives and employees have also been a top source of cash for Obama's campaign, contributing $236,211. Axelrod says he's never talked to Obama about Exelon matters. "I'm not going to public officials with bundles of money on behalf of a corporate client," Axelrod says.

URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/138519

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't we hear
About Hillary's ties to lobbyists? And don't tell me she has none!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. We hear plenty. Just do a simple search on these pages
Don't you know? Hillary is behind 9/11, Katrina, the tsunami, perhaps even Hitler rise to power.

Where the Clintons are concerned, this place is the same as freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Because Barack Obama is our nominee.
Hillary is not really the subject anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone on msnbc last night called Obama's lobbyist ties...
B Street connections ~ as opposed to McCain's many K Street campaign staffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I heard that
The idea was that his lobbyists were the low-lever sort that don't as much have the ear of the most influential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Clever way to put it I thought - several blocks from the action!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That's because he was barely two years in the Senate before he decided,
rather the powers that be in the party looking for an anti-Clinton candidate approached him, precisely because he was new with no national track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think McCain should bring this up....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. gee, I wonder why employees of one of Illinois largest Corporations
would support an Illinois Senator for the President???

It just boggles the mind!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama has also taken the most $$ from drug companies this election.
More than HRC or McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. not entirely true, he has taken money from drug company employees
Edited on Wed May-28-08 05:05 PM by LSK
You see when you donate money to campaigns, they ask you where you work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike L Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Most from management of the companies. em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. you do not know that and there is no evidence of that
Edited on Wed May-28-08 05:10 PM by LSK
I get sick of blanket statements with no sources behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Since only drug company EMPLOYEES may donate
your point is valid. Obama has raised more money from private citizens than any other campaign this primary season. That's gotta hurt his rival, McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I don't have anything against lobbyists
After all, the Sierra Club also has lobbyists. These groups provide an important function to educate our representatives, to point out additional points.

It is up to the elected officials, then, not to be swayed by contributions and to vote because of these, instead of on the merit.

(Utopia, I know, but, perhaps, someday..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. How many times has shit been posted, and how many times we debunked it?! Get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its too bad your user name doesnt apply to the Clintons
What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC