Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Come on. How embarrassing will it be if Obama gets the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:37 AM
Original message
Come on. How embarrassing will it be if Obama gets the
nomination without a majority of the popular vote!

That back-stabber Bill Richardson's head will spin off his torso he'll be so confused about whose ass he should be attaching his lips to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your argument is fatally flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Clinton's claim to a popular vote lead is ridiculous.
She includes a state that doesn't even vote in the general election, discounts caucus states that Obama won, and fully counts Michigan and Floriday.
Not only THAT, but as much as she wishes otherwise, popular vote does not determine the winner of the nomination.
Delegates do. And Obama is going to win that fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. What state...
...doesn't vote in the GE? I'm assuming you mean PR (not a state). Popular vote will have a big influence over the SD's, MI and FL included. Though we don't know yet the outcome of their delegate seating, a couple of million Democrats voted in those "primaries" whether we like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. Popular vote's "influence" on SDs
Unlike some of those trying to make the popular vote into an issue here, the SDs actually are not naieve, dishonest or stupid.

Let's imagine a discussion about the popular vote with, let's say, John Conyers, SD from Michigan:

You: Mr. Conyers, you should support Hillary because she won the "popular" vote during the primary campaign.

Conyers: Really? How were the votes from my state, Michigan, tabulated in this "popular vote" calculation.

You: Well, we gave HRC the votes she received in your state's primary.

Conyers: And Obama?

You: We gave him nothing.

Conyers: So you think it reflects the will of the people of Michigan to assume that there is no popular suppoort of Obama in our state whatsoever?

You: Yes.

Conyers: So you count votes from Puerto Rico, which doesn't get a say in the GE, but my support, and the support of hundreds of thousands of other Michigan citizens for Obama is discounted as a nullity and not reflective of the "will of the people"?

You: Yes

Conyers: Get the fuck out of my office, you moron.

Now, imagine that same conversation with the SDs from various states that conducted caucuses -- except add in, before the point where you are tossed out the SDs office, the statement that you are advocating that the voters in that particular state, who expressed their support for Obama through caucuses duly conducted in accordance with the rules of the party, should not be counted, but the popular vote from a tainted election in Michigan should be counted, albeit only for one candidate.
Actually, in those instances, the SD won't just demand that you leave his/her office, he/she will have you physically removed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is a territory, not a state...
...that is why it doesn't have a vote in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livingmadness Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lawdy. How embarrassing will it be
5 days from now, to have been spouting drivel for months and STILL have your candidate lose? Ah well, at least there are no questions as to whose ass your lips are attached to ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. My candidate John Edwards did lose when he dropped
out.

There's only one winner. Why would it be embarrassing to lose livingmadness?

You don't seem particularly intelligent in the sense you believe Obama will be able to win the GE without the support of Hillary Clinton voters.

And we all know he can not. He will be crushed by McCain without the tens of millions who support Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. So, you're saying that none of Hillary's supporters will vote Dem in November?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. No, I'm sure most will......I'm telling a very cocky
livingmadness that Obama needs the support of Hillary supporters.

Some Obama fans think he is so powerful, he can some how magically win with just the support of his voters.

And we all know that's laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
65. I'll agree with you there. We need every Dem and most of the independants...
...and even a few Repub crossovers for good measure.

I think Obama can get them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
73. So what Happens if Hillary gets Nom

Then some Obama suporters will not vote for Hillary! (Mexican Standoff)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livingmadness Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Why would it be embarrassing to WIN cboy4?
How do you know how 'tens of millions' of Hillary supporters will vote? And 6 months out from the GE? Forget intelligence, you obviously are prescient. Lucky you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Psssst
Edwards hearts Obama now.

Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. You make me sad
Such a waste of words and energy. Isn't it time to start directing your ire at the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm hip, people need to redirect their anger towards Mc4MoreWars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I can divide my ire blogslut....but I appreciate your
concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. really? you haven't exactly demonstrated that- at all.
your ire is consigned to all things Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well Obama irritates me. Why wouldn't I speak out about
that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. Gonna be a long summer & fall for you then
Will you shout 'SERENITY NOW!!!' every time before visiting DU to keep from posting about how much Barack Obama irritates you? The day is fast approaching when open criticism of the Democratic nominee will no longer be tolerated. Getting tombstoned over an inability to control one's rage...how embarrassing is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. There's nothing wrong with constructive criticism Cirque.
I criticize lots of Democrats when they deserve it.

And if Obama says something that irritates me in August or February 2009, you can count on me speaking my opinion.

This is, ummmm, a discussion board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
45. You're the one that claimed you could divide your ire
You can't. You're obsessed with your hate of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. No, I actually don't hate him....he just irritates me....He's like
the co-worker you never want to talk to in the hallway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Theres no way to count a popular vote in the primary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Will you support the Democratic Party nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Who cares about that? Will he shut up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. good point. wrong forum obviously
I'll take it elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Senator Obama would probably advise you to keep your
mouth shut as he needs every vote he can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Take your threats elsewhere. You are in charge of your own decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Oh boy. How many time have I said this? I've said if Obama
is the nominee, I will circle in his name at the voting booth, I will then throw up everywhere, and then drive home.

See, he gets my vote because I'm a loyal Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. so that would be a 'no': no support.
Not surprising. Kerry wasn't exactly at the top of my list, but I worked my ass off for him. I supported Clinton twice, even though I never liked him or his triangulating bullshit. McGovern was the only presidential candidate I actually agreed with politically. Time to cowboy up. Our party has made its choice, the primary season is over and now is the time to unify and work together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. What do you want from me Warren? Blood? I said I would
vote for Obama if he's the nominee.

But I'm not lifting a finger to help him in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
57. A loyal Democrat wouldn't act this way at the polling place. I pity you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. "A loyal Democrat wouldn't act this way at the polling place"
:spray:

I can't breathe!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why do you want to disenfranchise caucus states? Do you
hate Ameria? :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. You Need To Be Banned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Riiiiight, because I'm not an Obama fan. Please. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Ya, cause so many people get banned from this site for not liking Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. I know when I first signed up in 2002, the rules were very
clear.

"Must be an Obama fan!11!" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
69. The fact that you, Tellurian, OzarkDem, etc are still here...
...indicates to me that Obama fandom ain't a requirement here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #69
76. Of course it's not.....It's people like Ozark and myself
who make DU interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. Embarassing for whom?
Popular vote is impossible to determine. But you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
21. Is this Clinton's meme of the day or are you winging it?
And stop sliming Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. I think I loathe Joe Lieberman only slightly more than
Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. Since you were an Edwards supporter, you should follow his lead (or not), but
you really need to give it a break. My, my, such a hard-on for Sen. Obama and Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. I don't know. You explain to me how you calculate a "majority" of the popular vote
in a system that doesn't account for the popular vote in one-third of the states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
34. I bet lots of people that voted for Hillary are regretting it big time.
I used to like the Clintons, but that was ages ago. I'm soooo over them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
36. I do believe I have the vapors.
I must clutch my pearls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
37. Your irrational Bill Richardson hate-on stems from his betrayal of Clinton?
Nevermind what may be best for the nation? Not saying that's the case here, but from your OP it appears that your grievance is strictly with his switching of endorsement. How petty is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. He never endorsed Hillary to begin with
In fact he thought at one point he would make a better President than her and ran against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. You're right...my bad
Still, the OP apparently believes that Bill Richardson had signed some oath of fealty to the Clintons and that this betrayal demands retribution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. In the OPs mind
He hates Obama he doesn't love the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
58. But he was leaning toward endorsing her, which is why he
watched the Super Bowl with President Clinton as late as February.

He wants a White House job.

But then he decided Obama was probably going to be the nominee, and he would be doing the White House hiring .. so he dropped Hillary.

Even a piece of driftwood is smart enough to figure that out Jake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. He's a politian
Are you new to this. This is what they do.

Also talk about betrayal, He thought he was better than both of them because HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. No, running for president is not a betrayal. For one thing,
he was never going to be a threat.

Please, I can build a bridge to Neptune sooner than Bill Richardson will ever be president.

And secondly, there's only one job opening for president.

Friends know they're going to have to run against each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Wierd Logic
Edited on Thu May-29-08 06:46 AM by Jake3463
By running for President in the first place he was saying I don't think Hillary should be President. I should. Than after he drops out and had time to watch the race he made a judgement that Obama was the better candidate. He might want a White House job as well and part of picking that was who would most likely help me in getting that job i.e. actually being elected President.

Just because you have wings with an old friend and his wife happens to be running for President doesn't mean you owe your old friend's wife anything.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #37
54. Exactly. His betrayal of Clinton. His complete absence of
personal loyalty, his arrogance, and his mooching of White House jobs.

Why doesn't he ever get his own White House job? He's always sucking up to someone, so he has his own key to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RooferDem Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
38. Come on. How embarrassing will it be if Obama gets the
nomination, and during his victory speech on Tuesday he has a little glob of mustard on his upper lip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
46. Stop disenfranchising voters.
It's unbecoming a Democrat to insist on using numbers that don't include caucus states. Lay this to rest already. She is behind. In every metric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
47. yeah, you're right
He doesn't have the popular vote once you stop counting all those pesky votes. They do tend to get in the way don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
49. Don't you mean,
"How embarrassing will it be if Obama gets the nomination without a majority of the white vote,"?

Because, honestly, that's what this whole exercise sounds like.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
53. What's truly embarrassing is that anyone is buying into this argument...
Truly it is. What's worse, we've been told that those who don't buy into this fantasy are probably sexist. I just have to shake my head at those who think Hillary still has a future political career in this party. Personally, I don't think the Kennedy thing for her is in the cards either. She's lost too much respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
55. Not embarrassing at all. He will have enough elected delagates to become the nominee.
Your continued refusal to refrain from bashing Obama with senseless drivel is annoying. Please stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. You people post unflattering photos and cartoons of
Hillary, and outnumber Hillary supporters by about 20 to 1.

And you want me to stop?

Now that's funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
62. The nomination is based on delegates. Nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
64. LOL, still trying to fly that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
66. Still, Obama can say he did what the vast right wing conspiracy couldn't
he beat the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. yes he can
but taking out a Clinton is only going to impress the Republicans, who'll stick with McLame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. but those 'undecided'
will chose either Obama or McCain.
Perhaps HRC and Bigdog can swing some of them. I wonder which way they will push.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
67. how embarrassing is it hillary and her supporters can not do simple math n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. Right, just like when Obama said there were 57 states? Your candidate...
can't count I guess. :rofl:

Thanks, this was too easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. there is a difference between making a mistake and lying about numbers
continually being pointed out you are lying about numbers and continuing the lying about numbers.

if you can really compare hillary claiming she is ahead in popular vote, which is a lie, not true, a non truth to obama once making a mistake in speech, .... then you too are part of the ignore to press your agenda in dishonesty.

i dont respect that. i dont care the side, or the person.... but for people to expect to be taken seriously in lie isnt gonna happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
72. Last goal post, huh..lol When he does win the pop vote, I expect you to hush it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
75. FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yanez Houston Jordan Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
77. Hillary has spent well over twice as much money as any failed primary candidate in history, plus
she has the most recent past Democratic president (who remains popular) campaigning for her in the primary in a way that is entirely unprecedented in history (Bush didn't push his halfwit son with even one quarter of the fanaticism that Bill employs to push Hillary), and much of the DNC structure and membership is personally indebted to the Clintons in a way and to a degree that is unique.

After Hillary die-hards spent all of 2007 assuring us that she could not possible lose because she was totally inevitable, why do Hillary die-hards feign shock that the primary's popular vote remains close?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC