Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Argus Leader (SD): Clinton is top candidate for Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:39 AM
Original message
Argus Leader (SD): Clinton is top candidate for Dems

By The Editorial Board

Clinton is the strongest Democratic candidate for South Dakota. Her resilience and determination never should be questioned. She has met or overcome every challenge or roadblock in her way, and there have been many. Her determination to carry the nomination process through to its real conclusion has perhaps earned her a grudging respect from those who would never support her.

For the first time in memory, every state will play a role in choosing a nominee for the nation's highest office.

But Clinton is the strongest Democratic candidate for South Dakota.

Her mastery of complex policy detail is broad and deep, and her experience as a senator and former first lady matches that.

Measured against her opponent, Clinton is philosophically more moderate. That is likely a good thing for South Dakota.

Clinton has demonstrated a real commitment to Native American issues and will have visited several South Dakota reservations before the race is over.

Clinton is precisely correct when she says that people outside the region have a poor understanding of the troubling trends on our reservations. Federal attention could help. That includes but is not limited to higher-ranking posts in the federal bureaucracy.

Her truly universal health care plan would be welcomed by thousands of South Dakotans. Even on reservations, where health care is nominally universal already, such a plan would be welcome. The federal government would never be allowed to subject everyday Americans to the kind of care Native Americans living on reservations routinely receive.

Obama is justifiably credited as a powerful speaker, but Clinton holds her own easily. As those who have attended her South Dakota rallies can attest, she is quick on her feet and energetic. She frames her ideas clearly in speeches and answers questions with genuine directness.

Her resilience and determination never should be questioned. She has met or overcome every challenge or roadblock in her way, and there have been many. Her determination to carry the nomination process through to its real conclusion has perhaps earned her a grudging respect from those who would never support her.

Clinton might not win this race. In fact, it's a long shot. But whatever some might say, the race is not over, and her name is on the ballot. Win or lose, she's also the best Democratic candidate for South Dakota.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. whats the polling for SD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. the last poll was over a month ago and gave Obama a 12-pt lead
A more recent poll in Montana gives Obama a nearly 20-pt lead. I think Obama will win both Montana and SD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks for the info - thats why I like DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. I wonder why Obama is spending more time in Montana. Does he think he is going to
lose SD so he does not want it to appear that he is putting too much effort into it? Or is it because he thinks he has it locked down and does not need to spend as much time there (ala North Carolina). I hope he wins both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Actually I believe he is there today and then Saturday and Sunday in SD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Oh okay! That's good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. if so, most of his lead must be coming from over by sioux falls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. based just on what i've seen here in Rapid City, i think clinton is doing pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yeah, the paper she was talking to regarding Bobby Kennedy's assassination
and they were so dumb they didn't challenge her on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. In truth, they were smart enough to know she she wasn't "hoping he gets shot"

It was not surprising that the Argus Leader’s executive editor, Randall Beck, put out a statement saying, “Her reference to Mr. Kennedy’s assassination appeared to focus on the time line of his primary candidacy and not the assassination itself.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Which means they are too stupid to see that timeline of the 2008 primaries
was pushed up far earlier than 1992, 1968 or even 2000 and 2004. The difference was that in 1968, the nomination was not determined yet - now there are 3 events left - SD, MT and PR - and HRC can not get more pledged delegates because Obama already has more than half . In 1992, all of the strongest opponents Clinton faced had already dropped out - leaving only Jerry Brown. He already was the presumed nominee.

The question is why, after she started with all the advantages in name recognition, party support and media support, the voters should be overruled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Which means the editor who heard her answer in person doesn't buy the BO Camp's "outrage"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I agree that it did not mean that she thought Obama would be assassinated
My point is that the number of primaries already decided is far greater this year - which makes the time of year comparison stupid.

The surprise to me is that there were many threads, here and elsewhere in the blogosphere where people were offended by the use of CA 1968 the first time (or times?) she used it. I am kind of surprised that no one was able to convey those comments upwards then - when there was no major attention. Her internet team could have saved her the grief had they caught it then and seen that some people immediately translated CA 1968 to "assassination". She could likely have found other examples - or stuck with just 1972 - if she really thought this was a viable idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Arrrrrgggg us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. What drivel. They reduce Obama to nothing more than a "powerful speaker"--
I used to live in SD, it's a red state, and a Repub-leaning paper wants "Operation Chaos" to continue. No big surprise. They also defended her "assassination" remark, when the rest of the world could see it for the ghoulish thing it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Speaking of Obama as a Speaker, I found a Fantastic quote from Bill given on a "West Wing" Special
It was about campaigning in poetry and governing in prose. I'll try to find the exact quote I saw and post it but it is wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another right wing Gannett paper endorses the right wing corporatist.
Color me shocked! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
50. They will love
Obama then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. I bet that editor can't name ONE ISSUE Clinton fought for or led a fight for in opposition to Bush
her entire senate career.

She never FOUGHT for anything of any import to Dems or to this country if she would have to stand publicly against Bush to do so, and, in fact, she led opposition to those brave Democrats who DID stand to oppose Bush on his decision to use force in Iraq, his nominations of fascist judges, and sided against Dem plans for an Iraq withdrawal timetable.

Then, Lieberman lost HIS primary race, and HRC figured she could fool enough Dems and pretend she was for withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks for the kick!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. word up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Guess that RFK assassination quote clinched the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Another victim of Karl Axlerod's SwiftAsasinationGateBoat is heard from...
You gotta give Karl Axelrod his due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. You want a list of all the bullshit "scandals"
that they media/Clinton campaign has tried to use against Obama? I think snipergate/assassinationgate pale in comparison. If you can't handle any criticism of your girl, just watch fox news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Yup...
he is one great ventriloquist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. that's it, i am switching my vote now....
Edited on Fri May-30-08 11:47 AM by dionysus
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's great, I knew you'd wise up someday! Say, when did that tree fall on Karl Axlerod?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. Very nice endorsement!!!
Thank you for posting it.

Hillary IS the better candidate, unfortunately we'll probably end up with the new kid on the block.

Leave it to the Democrats to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R. Off to the greatest with thee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Good for them. They owed her a good word, for sure, after the whole "assassination" thing that came
our of their interview with her. I think this was the honorable thing for the Argus Leader to do.

Peace,
sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Thanks for the nice response,
...appreciated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Fantastic!
I knew they would endorse her.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Merry Xmas.
But you still won't be getting a bike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. Somehow this editorial reminds me of something from a high school newspaper.
The writer seems to admire qualities of toughness and stamina, as well as a regional advantage, but doesn't see the global imperative at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. two bit newspaper whose editor defended hillary's RFK comments
color me unsurprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. You'll *love* this!
Update: Another tip of the hat, this one going to Lambert of Corrente; he correctly observes how Argus, the same newspaper that interviewed Hillary last week didn't think too much of "the baseless, defamatory, and grotesque charges propagated by the NY Post and the Obama campaign" as evidenced by their endorsement of Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. k&R!
Edited on Fri May-30-08 06:33 PM by indimuse
I posted one as well.. didn't see yours! BUT...She also gained a SD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Excellent comment from your thread:
Update: Another tip of the hat, this one going to Lambert of Corrente; he correctly observes how Argus, the same newspaper that interviewed Hillary last week didn't think too much of "the baseless, defamatory, and grotesque charges propagated by the NY Post and the Obama campaign" as evidenced by their endorsement of Hillary.
< Indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Those dancing girls are getting around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. "every state will play a role in choosing a nominee for the nation's highest office."
:patriot:

It's been many years since I voted for someone I actually wanted to vote for, that being for Carter in the GE. This year it's for Hillary in Oregon's primary. Now let the chips fall where they may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Carter was my first ever Presidential vote, and my proudest.
I pounded some nails with him many years later and told him so - and he took my hand, and thanked me.
And you know what? He meant it. Be proud of that vote you're going to cast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I would have been honored to work with Carter, pounding nails or painting walls.
Carter was my first vote, also. I fell asleep watching TV the night of the election, woke up in time to hear the election declared for Reagan, and immediately burst into tears, like I knew deep down it was the beginning of the end. I felt so bad for Carter, I knew he'd been sucker punched.

On a more cheerful note, I already voted for Hillary (primary was last Tuesday), and you betcha I'm proud! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. I knew she was playing to the Hicksville haters
with the RFK crack. She's beyond repulsive so let them have her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. "Hicksville"
Thanks for the elitist kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. Nice endorsement
Edited on Fri May-30-08 09:42 PM by JoFerret
...many good points. Many GREAT points.
Obama folk should take note before jumping on the trash mobile.
Life is way more complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. Thanks for the response!
:you rock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. It's too little too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yeah, Democrats are wising up to Obama, but it's probably too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC