Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Willie Brown on MSNBC just now is and idiot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:14 PM
Original message
Willie Brown on MSNBC just now is and idiot
It's not that I disagree with his position, its just that he doesn't understand the facts.

He said FL should not be punished by not seating full delegates because the dems had no control over when the primary was, it was all in the hands of the GOP.

Now, you'll remember, as I do, this argument was being pushed a few months ago but we've not heard it recently because it has been debunked.

1. Almost all the dems voted for it, had the dems NOT voted for it they might have an argument.

MORE IMPORTANTLY

2. The dem party rules say, if you have no control over when the primary is set but you, as the dem party in that state make A GOOD FAITH EFFORT to stop the primary being set outside the rules, you get a pass.

The dem party did NOT make a good faith effort to stop the GOP setting the primary too early.

Brown didn't know it.

Either he should not be a politician if he's not going to be better informed or I should get a life and stay off the computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Either not being honest or ignorant. Take your pick. I had to laugh when I heard him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Obama fans reject Mr Brown because he told the truth(on vote to get paper trail primary date was set
there was no way to change anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. He knows more than you do
the republican controlled legislature in Florida attached it to a bill to ensure paper ballots - the dems were over a barrel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And if it was indeed the party heads who did this, punish them and don't seat the superdelegates..
...but count the votes...that's only fair. But wait, that helps Hilary, and anything that helps Hilary is inherently unfair. just as anything that shows people voted for her is inherently racist. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. that would work for me, on one condition. You had made THAT rule before the vote.
My beef is that the voters of the whole nation were told FL and MI would not count. I have friends in both places who did not vote because...they were told their votes would not count.

What about them?

It doesn't seem fair to me that the people who said "fuck the party, fuck the rules" might end up deciding who the nominee is when I followed the rules (which seemed reasonable to me, and the Hillary at the time) and my vote will not count for as much.

The vote in FL and MI was much depressed, lower than any other state this year.

It's wrong

It's unethical.

If Hillary wins by unethical means, that makes us just like them and she will lose in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. so the democratic party in florida had no intention of moving up the primary date?
As in they signaled to dean "hey, we dont want to move the primary up, but its going to be moved up anyways, so its not our fault."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No they weren't. It would have passed anyway.
So the GOP would have said the Florida Dems were against paper ballots. And the Floida Dems could have justifiably said they're lying. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Florida Dems didn't want to move the date up?
Oh really! Explain this then, please: http://youtube.com/watch?v=r25wUeMAwdE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No they were not over a barrel, the truth always works n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's amazing the amount of stuff
that people in high positions do not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's a matter of party discipline, which is more important than any one election.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC