Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With all due respect, Ickes was right, the MI ruling is wrong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:20 PM
Original message
With all due respect, Ickes was right, the MI ruling is wrong
Obama should not have been given ANY MI votes. They should have been UNCOMMITTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes and I'm sure Stalin would approve of your comment.
NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
59. Stalin? Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. With all due respect, Michigan should not have counted n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. BINGO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Double Bingo!
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:44 PM by Andy823
When I hear all the crap about breaking the rules by giving Obama delegates, and yet Hillary signed a paper saying those two states would NOT count, and Hillary wanted to get all the delegates even though Obama's name was not on the ballot, it makes me sick! :puke: Hell what was agreed to was put together by the democratic party in Michigan, why should anyone complain, this is what the state party wants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
49. aaannnddd SLAM-DUNK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. That's the point of all this.
Michigan never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ya...everyone knows...
that no one in MI wants Obama for president. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree that it was wrong. NOBODY should have gotten any delegates
out of Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. IMO, it should have been 50/50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Well, that would be the same net. But maybe more palatable for some, so okay.
I could go with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robyn66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. In my opinion
Michigan shouldn't have gotten any delegates at all. They had no excuse for breaking the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ickes = Wolverine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I was thinking more Gollum.
"FILTHY OBAMA CAMP! THEY SSSSTOLE IT FROM USSSS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stalin thanks you for those words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I disagree. They should have gone to Kucinich. Just to fuck things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Heh
If only, eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. And to reiterate
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:35 PM by quakerboy
I think they should have randomly redistributed several other states delegates as well. Some from California to Kucinich. A few Arizona delegates to Gravel, just to mix it up. Maybe a couple New Jersey Delegates should be assigned to vote for Ron Paul, just to encourage him a little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. The dictatorship of Hillaryland approves your message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I am an Obama supporter and a parlimentarian,they broke the Rule of Law to award those votes to him
They should have remained uncommitted he could have picked them up with a phone call, the same as Edwards delegates.

This ruling was not a legal compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Not "legal?" So, you're going to take it to court? Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Like it or not we are a country of laws. They only let her go forward
by breaking the rules for Obama.

They could have followed the rules of law and Obama would have been fine and picked them up as uncommitted the same as Edwards delegates, wih ou jusifying hr fighting on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. They should have counted NO votes according TO THE RULES.
That would have been a much better result, but since so many Hillary supporters are so losers, they tried to reach a compromise.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
58. This was a proposal from the state party ...
Edited on Sat May-31-08 08:29 PM by BearSquirrel2
This was a proposal from the state party in order to have their representation restored after they broke party rules. The credentials committee accepted this proposal. Blame Michigan.

I'm sick of all these Clinton supporters fake outrage when Hillary said the contest would not count and Ickes previously voted to remove all delegates from Michigan.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. hilary broke the rules..what say you about that
shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. There is no "legal" issue here
The DNC is a private organization, and the Supreme Court has ruled on multiple occasions that they have the right to award delegates in any manner that they see fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. There is no bylaw in the DNC that this is rooted in, They would need two motions to establish
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:38 PM by Boz
this motion legally they didnt cross there Ts and dot there Is and left a loophole for her to jump through.

The motion was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. The "election" was illegal. The committee supported the MI Dem Party's allocation.
The distribution of the illegal primary was clearly unrepresentative of the intent of the MI voters. The 50/50 split was just as arbitrary. The only real choices were to maintain the 100% ban or support the request of the state party.

Compromise is seldom welcomed by all parties, but is often necessary to move forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Then Hillary shouldn't have gotten any either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. While that would be the FAIR thing rules arent always fair, they have no self awareness
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:39 PM by Boz
MI had a certified vote, yes it was fucked up, but it was valid and the votes were cast for Hillary and none for Obama.
Thats what they should have allowed to be used with the 50% and then Obama could pick up the unsupported in fairly quickly, this was a broken rule of law end run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree. NO delegates should be awarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree.
Remember where you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. The ruling was wrong - with only one name on the ballet the MI votes shouldn't have counted or 50/50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
50. Kucinich and Dodd were also on the ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. With all due respect, no delegates should have been awared from MI
That was not an election. Democratic elections have all the candidates on the ballot.

So a compromise was reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. He was right about one thing only
That the process was flawed. When the voters are told the vote will count towards 0 delegates and the participants told not to campaign, then the election result cannot be said to reflect the will of the people.
The Michigan DNC then tabled what they saw as the best compromise, given the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. Stupidest idea EVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Uncommitted votes were clearly votes for not-Hillary
Why should she get any of them? The best option for her would have been a 73-55 split, with her getting the 2 add-ons, with each delegate vote counting as 1/2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. In My opinion
Florida and Michigan should have gotten no delegates so Ickes can go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yeah. Zero people wanted to vote for Obama.
And the delegate count should reflect that. That makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. And as the Chaos-bots like to say...
Ignore them at your peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. They ruled in favor of the state Democratic parties
in both cases. I think in the end, it was the only option available, given the circumstances. I'm just happy they didn't kick it to the credentials committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. With all due respect MI should not be counted but....
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM by Lerrad
Give all the MI votes to Hillary and Obama still wins.
So lets stop this arguing and Beat the shit of John McSane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. If I had my way Michigan would not have been seated! That was the fairest thing to do
because those were the rules they agreed upon at the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. With all due respect, your OP is wrong.
Edited on Sat May-31-08 06:42 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I am an Obama supporter, This has nothing to do with either candidate
It is the rules, many of us have complained about moving goalposts, this is just the same thing, it just happens to be for our benefit, but it is wrong just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Fairness and following the rules has nothing to do with partisanship.
There was no way in hell Michigan could be seated without all players being on the ballot. This is a fair resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. the election was declared invalid..
by the Michigan Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
37. Tell that to the democratic party in Michigan, who proposed the solution.
Apparently, the Clinton campaign knows better than the party in the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. If you're "respecting the voters" you have to respect those who would
have voted for Obama too. THAT is why they allocated the way they did. It was masterful, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Obama didn't respect them
he took his name off the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Indeed he did. He asked them to vote "uncommitted." That's why he
received credit for those "uncommitted" votes. It's really not that complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
45. True, reasonable grounds for appeal
Obama took his name off the ballot, though it was not required that he do so. He feared the loss in MI would hurt his chances in following primaries, as it would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Great strategy on Team Obama's part. Why hate?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. I actually kind of agree....
no one should have recieved any delegates, the whole primary should be tossed out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. Technically speaking
Hillary netted delegates out of contests that were considered invalid. The rules were changed at her request and the outcome benefitted her.

To spin this as an outrage to Hillary is ignoring obvious facts.

Take the victory and feel satisfied that she and yo got your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
51. The Michigan Democratic Party..
declared their election invalid. I was very impressed that Michigan acknowledged the election was flawed, people were told their votes would not count, and that this was the solution they advocated and crafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
53. How does the apportionment work?
Is it that all the uncommitted votes will be considered Obama votes when apportioning delegates, while the Clinton votes will be used to apportion her delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
57. With due respect there should be 0 Michigan Delegates ...

Remember Mr. Ickes voted against any Michigan representation before the contest and stripped that excercise of any legitimacy. Obama took his pledge note to participate seriously. Having your name on the ballot means YOU ARE PARTICIPATING.

The 50-50 split would have been the most appropriate avenue. But this was a good compromise to make the issue go away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
60. There were no delegates
delegates were not reassigned from one status to another because NO DELEGATES EXISTED until today. Michigan had exactly zero delegates walking in this am. Hillary had none, Barack had none, uncommitted had none. There were no uncommitted delegates because no Michigan convention delegates existed.

The Michigan Democratic party, through its own means, proposed a settlement for their willful violation, so that delegates could be created/accredited to represent them. The RBC accepted their recommendation with the automatic 50 percent sanction for the timing violation, as dictated by the rules.

The argument is stupid, because until today, no MI convention delegates existed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC