|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:20 PM Original message |
With all due respect, Ickes was right, the MI ruling is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes and I'm sure Stalin would approve of your comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bilgewaterbill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Stalin? Nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. With all due respect, Michigan should not have counted n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. BINGO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
38. Double Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
futureliveshere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
49. aaannnddd SLAM-DUNK!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
56. That's the point of all this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ya...everyone knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. I agree that it was wrong. NOBODY should have gotten any delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. IMO, it should have been 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Well, that would be the same net. But maybe more palatable for some, so okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robyn66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. In my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ickes = Wolverine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I was thinking more Gollum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. Stalin thanks you for those words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. I disagree. They should have gone to Kucinich. Just to fuck things up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. And to reiterate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. The dictatorship of Hillaryland approves your message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I am an Obama supporter and a parlimentarian,they broke the Rule of Law to award those votes to him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Not "legal?" So, you're going to take it to court? Good luck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Like it or not we are a country of laws. They only let her go forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. They should have counted NO votes according TO THE RULES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
58. This was a proposal from the state party ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. hilary broke the rules..what say you about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. There is no "legal" issue here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. There is no bylaw in the DNC that this is rooted in, They would need two motions to establish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
40. The "election" was illegal. The committee supported the MI Dem Party's allocation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. Then Hillary shouldn't have gotten any either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. While that would be the FAIR thing rules arent always fair, they have no self awareness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. I agree. NO delegates should be awarded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
15. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. The ruling was wrong - with only one name on the ballet the MI votes shouldn't have counted or 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Kucinich and Dodd were also on the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. With all due respect, no delegates should have been awared from MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. He was right about one thing only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. Stupidest idea EVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. Uncommitted votes were clearly votes for not-Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. In My opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yeah. Zero people wanted to vote for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. And as the Chaos-bots like to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
32. They ruled in favor of the state Democratic parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerrad (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
33. With all due respect MI should not be counted but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
35. If I had my way Michigan would not have been seated! That was the fairest thing to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
36. With all due respect, your OP is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I am an Obama supporter, This has nothing to do with either candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Fairness and following the rules has nothing to do with partisanship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. the election was declared invalid.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
37. Tell that to the democratic party in Michigan, who proposed the solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
43. If you're "respecting the voters" you have to respect those who would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Obama didn't respect them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Indeed he did. He asked them to vote "uncommitted." That's why he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
45. True, reasonable grounds for appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Great strategy on Team Obama's part. Why hate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
47. I actually kind of agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
48. Technically speaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
51. The Michigan Democratic Party.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. How does the apportionment work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
57. With due respect there should be 0 Michigan Delegates ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
60. There were no delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC