Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Mythbusting: Kerry did not lead in Ohio and Florida prior to the '04 vote.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:44 PM
Original message
Election Mythbusting: Kerry did not lead in Ohio and Florida prior to the '04 vote.
This is an often repeated lie by many on this site that I feel breaks morale and discourages our resolve. Here's a link for everyone:
http://www.surveyusa.com/Scorecards/Scorecard2004AllGeneralX.html

Kerry clearly trailed in Ohio and Florida polling was all over the place, but on average he was slightly behind there as well. The idea that Obama's leads in these states are meaningless is simply incorrect. If he maintains them at current levels, he will win them more likely than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can anyone use the 2004 election, especially Ohio, as
a gauge for anything?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It confirmed most of the voting trends from 2004 in close elections.
We could see pretty firmly what the two parties' bases of support were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Does it confirm
how many votes were suppressed (est. 350,000) and the extent to which the GOP tampered with the election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That has precisely 5% relation to my OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The actually OH election and results has everything to do with your OP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, and the president's approval ratings hovered near or at 50%
That kind of number is a predictor of an encumbent getting re-elected. 2008's structure is definitely in the Democrats' favor. This does not mean we can relax or think it's in the bag, but that our chances are far better than 2004. I think Kerry's debate performances were what allowed him to get as close as he did in an election that was set up to favor the encumbent (war time president, 50% approval rating, the country still extremely afraid).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. And 2008 is nothing like 2004 - Homeland Security isn't ginning up terror alerts every
time Obama makes a crucial hit against McCain.

I also believe that Rather's lawsuit against CBS, his admission that corpmedia was protecting Bush in 2004 for the favorable rulings they expected in a Bush second term, and McClellan's current book tour that validates the charge the media went easy on Bush has made some in the media concerned about being seen as Bush's watercarriers. Now, they were ALL warriors in questioning Bush all these years, dontcha know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do you have the polls from June. I think this is what people are referring to, though I do not know
Edited on Wed Jun-18-08 05:29 PM by Mass
whether a comparison is adequate or not.

In addition, I would say that polls that early are meaningless. What is important is to spread the message to those who have not heard it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. WORRY WARTS NEED TO FUCK OFF
SERIOUSLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC