Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Open Left" Blogger makes interesting case for why it's Hillary...worth reading while we wait...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:11 PM
Original message
"Open Left" Blogger makes interesting case for why it's Hillary...worth reading while we wait...
Hillary Clinton
by: tremayne
Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 00:42

No, I didn't get a text message. Just a hunch and this post might look really dumb very shortly. Partly, it's based on the process of elimination. The supposed final 3 were Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. Two days ago Biden was asked where he'd be this Saturday and he said "here" (in Delaware) and then followed up with "I'm not the guy." If he was just trying to deflect attention away that was an overly definitive statement. I think he's not the guy. While he'd bring a lot to the ticket he carries some risk, perhaps too much for the careful Obama.
Follow along for the rest.

As I've argued before, I think the schedule would be odd for a Virginia VP pick. You spend 2 days in VA and then leave to make the announcement somewhere else? And then you go (reportedly) to Indiana? Plus, there's this from Ambinder:

VA Dems pessimistic about Kaine's chances after reading his body language.

There was also an unconfirmed report that Kaine hadn't tested well compared to Warner with Virginia voters. If the main reason for his selction is to carry Virginia and that's not a certainty, do you pick him?

Bayh would be totally uninspired. It would say "I have this election in the bag and all I want my VP to do is not say anything stupid for 2 months." The strongest signal that it's Bayh is that we have heard so little from his camp. And that kind of discipline might be very appealing to Obama. So, of the three, and with the Indiana event that has been reported, I would predict Bayh.

But there are some reasons to think Obama might do something unexpected, something like going with Clinton. Here are some:

1. The race is undeniably close at this point. The Obama team may have a much superior ground machine but that sounds a little too much like wishful thinking for me. Obama wants to win and there is reason to believe that Obama support among Dems would move toward the 90% range if Clinton is the VP. It may move in that direction anyway but do you really want to leave that to chance?

2. The Clintons would complicate Obama's White House. But Obama is a pretty confident guy. Like Bill Clinton of the 1990s, he is pretty good at compromise. I am sure he is cognizant of the potential problems and also confident in his own ability to deal with it.

3. It goes against brand but maybe it doesn't. He's for change and HRC represents the past. But she, like he, would make history with a victory in November. In that sense they both represent significant cultural change.

4. Obama needs somebody (if he realizes it) who is willing to throw sharp elbows and dirty punches. He gets 2 such people with the Clintons. Bill used to be somewhat subtle with the putdowns but that was then and this is now.

5. If, in June, Clinton told you she should be your VP and you were seriously considering it, what would you do? You would probably tell her that the only way it could happen is if you wholeheartedly endorse me, make it clear you have gotten over the joint ticket idea, have those under your influence (such as the "Vote Both" folks) drop all of their efforts on HRC's behalf. You'd say, I can't look weak by picking you, like I was forced by circumstance. It must look like a choice I made that I didn't have to make but I did because I'm such a big person and I care about the country and I care about victory.

6. If, given the bitterness and length of the primaries, HRC came to you and said "I want to have my name formally submitted for nomination," would you say "sure" and also reward both Clinton's with high-profile speeches at the convention? Wouldn't you be a little worried about that? Unless of course you already had a VP deal in the works too.

7. There's no time left for McCain to raise "scary Hillary Clinton" money for his campaign because he switches to public financing in 13 days. The RNC can raise money this way but then again, Hill and Bill are pretty good fundraisers who would free Obama from those duties for the fall.

8. I've heard that Obama has a sense of theatrics and staging. Does he really think Obama-Bayh is exciting?

Okay, that's enough. Like I said, this will probably look dumb but who knows. I think when the only option is Bayh you really hope for anything that would be more exciting than that. Like "Obama-Can of Paint, 2008"

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=259BB5230BC9D5C6679662578282AC61?diaryId=7658
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. According to recent stories, she was never even vetted...
which kinda puts the kibosh on her being the VP, no?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080822/pl_politico/12713
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I read she was vetted....it was Bill who had the problem not releasing donors to his library.
:shrug: I'm not supporting Hillary...just thought it was an interesting viewpoint from the blogger about Bill speaking the day the VP is introduced at the Convention. And Hillary also having a prominent slot, plus a few other observations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I doubt that there's any skeletons in her closet that we don't know about.
The Clintons were under the microscope for 8 years. If there was any there, there...it would have been exposed a long time ago. Of all the potential candidates for VP, I think Obama would have really nothing to vet with HRC.

I'll be more than happy to support his choice and he could do a hellava lot worse than selecting Hillary.

Don't see much mileage gained in revving up the Clinton attack machine, either. "OMG, Hillary's running!...we could end up having another 8 years of peace and prosperity!" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree they wouldn't find anything...
but if they didn't even try, it's a sure sign she was never seriously considered. And I, too, would be totally cool with Hillary on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I heard the talking heads on FOX News of all places saying those *exact same words.*
That she hasn't been vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same old re-hashed talking points.
As every other piece on this subject. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. why are you so full of hatred?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. lol.
I was born to hate! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Biden's comment the other day could be because he'd not been told yet. And Hillary
Edited on Fri Aug-22-08 01:21 PM by wlucinda
still could very easily be the candidate. Even the politico article refustes itself with the last line quoting an Obama aide saying Hillary had been vetted for 16 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it could very well be her
Wouldn't surprise me in the least.

Before the primaries I think everyone pretty well the tiucket would be Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think she'd make a great VP. Then again I was a supporter of hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC