Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pregnancy Scandal Involving Sarah Palin Daughter? - Post Chronicle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:06 AM
Original message
Pregnancy Scandal Involving Sarah Palin Daughter? - Post Chronicle
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:06 AM by rndmprsn
this story is staring to get some traction...

to me its not the pregnancy, this kind of stuff happens...thats life...but, its the potential lies, judgment, cover up and susceptibility to extortion that having this "secret" would bring into the whitehouse.

if this is story is true, then i believe it shows how a panicked john w mccsame made a terrible choice and put this OWN AMBITIONS AHEAD OF THE COUNTRY'S WELL BEING - COUNTRY SECOND.

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168574.shtml

Bristol Palin pregnancy scandal? Rumors have begun circulating online about whether Governor Sarah Palin is young Trig's, supposedly her 5th child, mother at all...

...The allegations are that Sarah Palin's 16-year-old daughter, Bristol Palin (pictured left) became pregnant, and that Sarah Palin pretended the baby was hers.

Could this be true?

According to comments from classmates and other members of the community, Bristol Palin was out of school during what would have been the last trimester of the governor's pregnany due to a bad case of mono. A case so severe, according to the Palin family, Bristol missed nearly 5 months of school.

To be totally upfront, we have no idea if this story is accurate but online sources say it is so.

So, what is really happening here? Could this be simply a case of a mother who was simply trying to protect the image of her family or was this a deceptive politician using this falsehood to bolster her career and win admiration for claiming the child as her own and choosing not to terminate the pregnancy knowing the child would have Down's Syndrome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. If the baby is not hers, she's a lying hypocrite.


And using a Downs Syndrome infant to further her own political career and cause her daughter a lifelong sense of shame & secrecy.
This story deserves all the traction it can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Watch for the other shoe, the baby doesnt have down syndrome.
It only took two days for the media to print the first part, another day on the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. it disgusts me to repeat this but it is rumoured that the baby looks
more like an Inuit than a Down Syndrome child.

God help us -- either we are very twisted , or she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glancingthefuture Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. WHY MAKE DU look bad by starting/spreading vile rumors when
you have written NOthing to back this up??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. Yeah, it disgusts you. MMM hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
52. If TRUE we should shutup till she gets the nom and lies again about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
57. That explains my first thought when I saw the

baby on tv -- the Downs is either very mild, or the baby is of mixed race, but not having been around Inuits, I didn't quite put it together. This makes more sense. Darn, just when I was going to give in to the rational, "take off that damn tinfoil hat" DUers.

Bristol missed five months of school? Hmmm. Maybe they misheard the doc. He said she was "going to be a mom" and they heard "She is going to have mono."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
59. Thanks for saying that
I'd been wondering the same thing outloud to dh, who thought people wouldn't do stuff like that. My position is that power is poisonous to some personalities, read your damned history books, and yeah, I'd like to know if this woman is one of them before someone hands her the key to the WH.

Just because some is picked for this or that position, or has held this or that position, doesn't mean they are qualified. Or stable enough. Or smart enough. That is what citizens are supposed to figure out on their own, before they vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. So did Palin fake looking pregant?
This story is a bit goofy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thats the part of this that is the hardest to swallow...
Once you really start thinking about someone pulling this off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I've only seen one photo where she looked a little pregnant

NONE where she looked really pregnant.

And of course she could have faked it in the "little bit pregnant" photo. Mentally disturbed women do it, and a woman determined to protect her political future could too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. In my mind this woman IS mentally disturbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
47. If you are going to say that by definition fundies are "mentally disturbed" then I'm with you. n/t
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:36 AM by totodeinhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. i don't have those answers and do not pretend too, the point is other media are starting to cover...
this, and if indeed its true...and i do not know that, then it is very revealing about mccsame and his VP pick's character.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I guess...they're covering "online sources" - not persuing the actual story.
Anyone of us could have written this story - they are reporting on us more than the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. but we didn't..."online sources" might push the media to do some investigating on its own...
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 08:26 AM by rndmprsn
then when that happens and if more is uncovered, this becomes a bomb.

when/if KO covers this...then it becomes real.

the point is...the potential cover-up, lies and terrible judgement, but i digress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Speak for yourself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Was the John Kerry shooting himself for a Purple Heart story true ??
Truth went out of style four years ago with these creeps !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
62. It's not 'other media' - it's a website that reprints wht it finds on other sites
and it thinks it's a smear campaign. I suppose the only surprising thing is that, although the site is clearly right wing - looks at the "Friends of tPC Politics" in the left hand column of its home page- it has bothered printing this. But all it's doing is reprinting what a blog said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. No in fact when she announced it publically at 6 months, people that worked with her were shocked
And stated publically that she didn't look pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. In addition, the first time she announced it was two weeks AFTER she was mentioned as a VP lister
for the first time. So several scenarios to cover up.

On one hand she has used the baby to show her strong support against abortion.

Two, if it is a cover u for the daughter it may not have been to protect the daughter, but her political career, cant have an unwed teen daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. As goofy as saying Obama is a Muslim?
or was a "terrorist" with Bobby Seale in 1968?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. I could not give a shit if her 16 year old had 100 kids w/o being married...
...what does concern me is:

1. Palin is a lying hypocritical POS; and

2. She knows for a FACT that abstinence only does not work, but still supports it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonicmedusa Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Especially #2
As women our decisions should be between us and our doctors. Sarah Palin will work hard to take those choices away from us.

She is an abstinance only supporter, even though the rest of us may not have the luxury of stepping in and raising the grandchildren that will be forced on us as our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
61. If this story about the pregnancy is true
then she chose to use deception to hide what happened to them, rather than admit her policy is a failure in some situations.

A person with good moral character would have just come out and said, okay fine, my child is an example where abstinence didn't work. But we can make it work, maybe talk more, maybe do X,...and so on. Use it as an example, or a talking point or a place for discussions to begin on the subject. Personally, I will still think her ideas of "no choice for women" are hog snot, but understand the situation that came up for her, and not hold that against her, obviously, wouldn't hold it against anyone. What I hold against her, if this plays out, is the deception. That is simply huge to me.

Hiding the evidence of the failure of her stupid ideas, ideas which she wishes to foist on to every American woman, means that she is not fit for even the office she freaking holds. Hypocrital, but worse, since she wishes to impose her belief structure in this regard on our whole country now as a vp candidate. She doesn't want fruitful debate on her positions strengths (?) and obvious weaknesses - she wants to be in a place where she can steamroll the laws and stack the USSC in order to force her beliefs onto others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Make it about the cover up
The fact that they are lying to the world about who's baby that is.

Parents have in the past raised a child of their child similar to what this may be. But it she is telling the world that it is hers, either she is lying or she is psychotic and actually believes that it is. That goes to mental illness and there are documented cases of women taking other mothers babies and claiming them for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Agreed.

If true, the real scandal of this is her using the baby to promote her own right-to-life agenda while at the same time implicitly causing her daughter a sense of shame about unwed pregnancy. Shit happens.
Liars lying are reprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
45. Then, what?
So, you get her to admit the lie about her daughter's baby. That's great. Then, what???

Are you willing to gamble that the effect of exposing her as a liar is greater than the SYMPATHY she will garner when she has an opportunity to publicly explain why she lied? Remember, taking on her daughter's kid plays into the whole anti-choice bullshit. I can hear the public apology speech now. "I thought I was doing the right thing! I was only protecting my family. *sob* *sob* *sob*". Can you predict the public reaction to that? I can't.

Do you see the potential for backfire, here? At least admit the potential, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. wouldn't a 44 yo pregnant women be considered high-risk and not allowed to travel?
my sister who had a child @ 34 was considered higher-risk and she thinks a 44 yo woman would have been even more restricted in he daily activities...@ 8 months pregnant, she should have been on bed rest and certainly not traveling across the country giving speeches etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. The commerial airline wouldn't even have let her on the airline with out Dr approval
FAA and liability rules would have precluded it, because a situation could have put others in peril with emergency changes if her situation changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. thats what my sister just said too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. WRONG. If you'd been reading the many Palin threads you'd know
that Alaska Airlines has no such restrictions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. It has to, it is a FAA regulation with ANY major medical condition that could alter the flightplan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. Wouldn't it have to?
Don't Alaskans in remote areas sometimes need to fly to a city with a hospital in order to deliver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. i did see that, what is your oppinion on all these coincidental revelations?
now being reported in some print media, on daily kos and huffington...i'm curious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remember2000forever Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Downs Syndrome Is Usually The Result Of Older Eggs, Not Younger Ones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. But not exclusively, and in addition there is now a question of the Down Syndrome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. what's the question?
inuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Not one of the typical features of Down Syndrome, several points for Inuit
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:08 AM by Boz
and thats just one picture.

No upturned eyes, no flat head spaces, regular brain pan size and cross section coordinate nose and eye symmetry, no demonstrated or pronounced solid skull sutures.

Standard Inuit Color, nose flare, occipital orientation and composure, standard Inuit heavy lid on the eyes and so on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remember2000forever Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. So Are You Suggesting That The Daughter Had A Fling With An Eskimo?
Wouldn't that be accepted in Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Absolutely accepted, the problem would have arisen, after Palin said it was hers.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:06 AM by Boz
How would you explain Palin giving birth to an Inuit child, her husband has Inuit blood from a grandmother link, but none of those features showed up in previous children.

So now you have Palin saying shes going to be a mom, covering for the daughter, she rushes back when the daughter has the baby to "give birth" Uh oh Inuit, how do we explain that. Well Inuit are mongol related anthropologically, and Down syndrome is "a mongoloidesque" look as a side effect.

Bingo Down Syndrome.

Just as an aside she didn't announce that the baby was down syndrome afflicted until after the birth even though she had only told the public she was pregnant a month before she "gave birth". Even though today she champions that they had the baby tested and knew and could not terminate because of her strong beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
53. Babies may have some or all of the syndrome, & with varying severity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
48. Okay, I'm starting to have my doubts here
I thought this story was bullshit from the get go.

I now have a doubt about whether or not Sarah Palin's story is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mortos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. Actually the majority of Down Syndrome children are born to mothers under 30
My best friend's brother in high school fathered a Downs Syndrome baby with his 16 year old girlfriend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
50. The children w/DS that I work with mostly have young parents - I can't quote you statistics but
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 10:09 AM by AnotherMother4Peace
this is what I have been seeing in recent years. I'm thinking it might be environmental. There is a known cluster of babies born with Down Syndrome in Ireland to young women who attended a girls school. There was a nearby fire at a nuclear power plant that is being investigated as being a possible source of this cluster. There are a couple of other cluster births of Down that I've heard of: one in New Mexico and one in Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #50
63. Interesting, my OB says that womwn of Irish decent (me for ex.,)
are at a higher risk for babies w/ neural tube defects. Have you heard that, as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sad to say, but even if this whole story is BS, it;s too juicy to go away.
It's the kind of thing Nancy Grace dreams about at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. You know for sure that it is just BS? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I have no idea. That's why I said "even if" it's BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
35. she missed 5 months of school at exactly the same time she would have looked pregnant?
Five Months?? for Mono???


I am no doctor but that seems strange to me

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. Not to be a downer on this
but is this publication even real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. Seems that there is plenty of material to go after her on her record and experience
whereas something like this baby gate could come back to bite Dems in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
41. And--if it is true--making sure the baby would be covered by
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:25 AM by tblue37
the parents' insurance for all his medical needs--and since he has Down Syndrome, those expenses will inevitably add up. If this turns out to be true (and we should always qualify it if we have no proof, no matter how fishy their stories about the pregnacny and birth seem to be), then the Palins would also be guilty of insurance fraud, and that is no small matter.

On the other hand, keeping such a switch secret when so many people would have to keep their mouths shut would be very, very difficult. (This was not a home birth, but a potentially high risk hospital birth).

I think that there are certainly lies involved, but as another DU poster said yesterday, it may be no more than lies about her water breaking and then her toughing it out, giving a speech, and taking an 11-hour flight home to give birth, presented just to shore up her image with Alaskans as a tough frontier woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. There's also the question of how she even became preggers at 43
the chance in the real world w/o fertility treatments is less than 3%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #46
58. And if she knew it was unlikely, she may not
have used protection. It does happen, even at 43. But I am not convinced that thia is Sarah Palin's baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
49. Um, the Post Chronicle?
Can you tell me anything about the Post Chronicle?

It looks like an Internet "news" aggregator.

Stop trying to make this appear to be news. It's baseless wanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
51. why did you deliberately omit this from the end of the article?
"Or could this just be a smear campaign? Gut feeling: Smear campaign"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
54. Well, IF she lied, she did it to protect her daughter
and she's raising the child so her daughter can finish school and have a shot at a decent life. Not the first time a grandmother has stepped in to make her daughter and grandchild's life a little easier.

And who would it hurt, really?

I think I'm going to move on.

So what's with her sister Molly and her divorce / custody battle? What would be an example of an inappropriate use of power, in Sarah's opinion?

Why won't her mother in law vote for her?

How much say will the "first dude" have in her decisions? I assume he's quitting his job to become a full time parent, like Michelle did when Obama hit the trail, but I haven't heard, so are their kids being raised by a parent or a nanny?

What, exactly, did she do to put her town 20M in debt and what would be her motivation to lower oil prices when Alaskians are getting $3300 per person back in windfall profit taxes. And why don't all us us get a piece of that action - or are windfall profit taxes only a good idea up north?

How does she feel about the civil war /genocide in Darfur? Where does that sit with her pro-life stand or does the right to protection end at birth? IS she pro-death penalty?

If global warming is bullshit, why is Alaska's permafrost melting. And what's going to happen to Alaska if she's wrong? Any backup plan besides prayer?

Speaking of prayer, where does she stand on the separation of church and state? Does she support teacher led prayer in public schools? Does she support public money for private school vouchers? Should the teaching of craationism be allowed, or be mandidory?

I'd go on, but I've got to get ready for a labor day party.

See y'all later.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Protect he daughter by keeping her out of school for six months?
More like protecting the family name and her political stances about pre-marital sex. If true it would the the height of hypocrisy.

Thomas Jefferson once said: "We should never be afraid of the truth". Living a lie does nothing but put the whole family in jeopardy of ridicule and scandal if found out and the fact is it's simply a lie. The real mother should be known as the real mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. Why does everyone talk about protecting her daugher? What if the daughter wanted to acknowledge her
own baby or have an abortion and it was Sarah who could not live with either of those alternatives. And why is making your child live a lie "protecting" her?

People are nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto-Che-Guevara Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
56. What is the Post-Chronicle?
Never heard of that newspaper before. Is it even a newspaper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
60. Hard to believe the doctors involved would be lying. She stopped
mid flight when in labor to be checked one article says. Her mother in law talks about the pregnancy. Seems like a lot of people would have to be lying with her. I still believe what you say about McCain to be true irregardless. What we know about her to be true is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
65. just to remind...its not about the daughter or baby...
its about the lying, cover-up, possible extortion in the WH and horrible judgment.

get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC