Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anchorage TV Station: Sarah Palin Was "Definitely Pregnant" With Trig

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cascades07 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:43 PM
Original message
Anchorage TV Station: Sarah Palin Was "Definitely Pregnant" With Trig
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 09:45 PM by Cascades07
The Huffington Post's Lee Strahan interviewed the reporter that appears in the picture used as evidence that Sarah Palin was pregnant with her son, Trig.

Her name is Cherie Shirey, seen in the picture holding a microphone:



Cherie said: "These internet rumors are very bizarre. We worked with Governer Palin many times in 2008. Our reporters worked her on location and in the studio and I worked with her myself. She was definitely pregnant. You could see it in her belly and her face. The whole idea that Sarah Palin wasn't pregnant with Trig is completely, absolutely absurd. "

"It's a KTVA reporter in this picture with Governor Palin. Shirey confirmed the photo was taken in April, 2008", the Huffington Post reports.

link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/anchorage-tv-station-pali_b_123029.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Bristol Palin is definitely pregnant now.
They are a fertile bunch, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. She certainly looked pregnant in this photo.
And since her daughter is 5 months pregnant now, I think the case is closed. The baby can't be Bristol's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. She holds her belly just like her daughter. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I never saw a pregnant woman who didn't do that, at one time or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't think my wife did.
3 kids. She never did it. Maybe it's cultural. She's Japanese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. You could be right.
As much as anything else, it's a way of showing off the pregnant belly. And not to paint people with too broad a brush but it seems that Asians are less inclined to show off than are Westerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I didn't do it to show off.
My hands were either on top of my belly, under it, on my sides or on my back because I hurt so much. Because my belly was always too big to put my arms around it comfortably by the time I was in my seventh and eighth month, much less the nineth and tenth. Yes, there is a tenth month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Which is why I said...
"As much as anything else...." Some women like to show off their bellies. Nothing wrong with that. It's exciting to know you're going to bring a new life into the world. Some women do it because it's a natural place for the hands to fall or because of aching back or abdominal muscles.

In the case of the photo of Bristol Palin holding her belly, backstage, at her mother's debut as McCain's running mate, I suspect it was not to show off, since she had done everything possible to hide it, that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. So they say, but they may have been duped.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 09:49 PM by TexasObserver
She never showed a bit for 7 months, then suddenly there was her "belly." Or was it just another contrivance by a very deceptive and media savvy governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. This doesn't explain her astonishingly bad judgment--or McCain's
A 44-year old woman, with a history of four previous pregnancies, traveled many hours by commercial airliner, after an amniotic fluid leak, then drove another 50 miles to a small, outlying hospital, with no NICU, to deliver a one-month premature, high risk baby.

And, three days later, she left her special needs baby in the hospital to return to work in the capitol, more than 800 miles away. She exposed her child to terrible danger and demonstrated unspeakably deficient mothering skills.

Nobody in their right mind could ever want her finger anywhere near the proverbial button. And that McCain would pick her has to call into question his ability to make sound decisions in the best interest of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascades07 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It explains the Daily Kos' and Andrew Sullivan's judgment
Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. So, what do you think of her judgment, as a mother?
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 10:04 PM by Fridays Child
And McCain's judgment in picking her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. stop posting the same stuff
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM by iamthebandfanman
especially if ur new here... atleast look around before posting something thats been posted 100 times...

i cant believe anybody even replied to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascades07 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. This is the first time anyone mentions this Huffington Post interview
Or at least the first thread on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. But you replied.
;)

And so did I--only as a segue to the topic of Sarah Palin's terrible judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I still don't understand how her staff didn't know she was pregnant till right before the birth!
Something doesn't smell right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. why did she go from 4 am after leakage until midnight before she sought
medical attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. The rumors only took off because her freaking daughter looked like a preggo.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM by Arrowhead2k1
Which we find out, she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Leave the kid alone and don't make excuses.
Someone started the rumor and everyone ran with it. Like most gossip, it was wrong and everyone was wrong to carry it on. Now everyone needs to drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I had no part in the rumors personally.
But when I saw the pics of the daughter looking pregnant, it had me thinking too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. We worked with her all the time.... never saw her daughter....
Wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. It doesnt explain these photos on March 14th
March 14





March 14 photo with heavy contrast via photoshop, sorry about the wash out at the top, I wanted clear contrast on the jacket and the skirt. Notice she's leaning backwards which should cause a very definable bulge in the belly if those April 14 photos are correct. She doesnt go from flat to huge in a month.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes, and in the background reflection of the glass I can make out the grassy knoll shooter...
( :eyes: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. She must have only started showing in the last month or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. She goes from flat to that??? In a month?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Sure looks like it to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. seems unlikely to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gee thanks for joining DU to inform us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. THAT ISN'T WHAT THE ARTICLE SAYS ...
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 10:32 PM by doublethink
You state this .... "The Huffington Post's Lee Strahan interviewed the reporter that appears in the picture used as evidence that Sarah Palin was pregnant with her son, Trig. Her name is Cherie Shirey, seen in the picture holding a microphone"

That is a lie ..... the reporter with the mic is Andrea Gusty of KTVA. I'll be right back with a link.

http://www.ktva.com/anchors/ci_6613755

now check out this video and compare your picture with the reporter .....

http://www.ktva.com/video

(just click on the first video to the right on the page.)

ps: lots of other videos on that page with "Palingates" going on up there especially the ones on Troopergate. Peace.

on edit: with updated links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. True, the lady in the picture is Gusty


link properties (h)ttp://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site163/2008/0201/20080201_052648_Gusty-small_200.jpg

Not sure if it matters, but there's a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Thanks for posting that ..... I updated my post too with links.
Just pertebs me when people get facts wrong. :) Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sarah, show us the original birth certificate and hospital records. America needs to know !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC