Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NADER on CSPAN now monday 9AM eastern

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:01 AM
Original message
NADER on CSPAN now monday 9AM eastern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why doesn't Nader have anything powerful to say about race and gender?
It's very confusing.

Just said he has asked Green Party not to consider him and would only run as an independant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. that's one reason
most of his support is while liberal males. if he talked about these issues i'm sure he could get more amount of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. he says he's exploring a run as an independent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. He just endorsed Kucinich
more or less.

But he didn't say he wouldn't run if Kucinich were nominated.

Says he plays within the party rules, and that he's clear and cogent.

Commented on K losing mayor's seat after fighting electric company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. He refuses to admit he cost Gore the election
He's in total permanent denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree with him. Read Toobin's book, like Nader said, and you won't blame
Nader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Does Toobin's blame Gore's loss on Gore? Not counting ALL counties?
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 09:33 AM by flpoljunkie
Rather than cherrypicking Volusia, Dade, Broward and Palm Beach?

Edited to add: Let's see Ralph, even 38% of 97,488 of the votes you received in Florida is 37,045! Hello???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Toobin says:
on the morning after the election, Gore was advised by the top experts on recount law that he had to get a statewide recount. The experts told him exactly where he would find the votes he needed to win. Gore chose a four-county recount rather than follow their advice. Ultimately, the recount proved that Gore was wrong and the experts were exactly right.

However, Toobin's book isn't just about this one event. His book lays out a series of dozens of events and choices by Gore, all which were very wrong, which inexorably led to his loss. It would have been hard to pick just one to change which would have altered the outcome. Collectively, however, it looks like (1) Gore was Gore's biggest enemy, and (2) the Democrats didn't take the necessary steps to counter Republican conniving (eg, the butterfly ballot, getting black votes counted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Thanks, AP.
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 09:50 AM by flpoljunkie
Gore, whom I loyally supported, was a lousy candidate and the mercurial and pendantic Gore still does not know who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. I don't disagree that the Gore campaign was fubared
almost from day 1. Gore got where he did in spite of his self and his campaign. I rolled my eyes the day I heard the breaking news report about Gore inventing the Internet, regardless of what he really said and how it happened.

My only point is that but for Naders votes in FL, Gore would have won. If 75% of Nader's votes in FL would not have voted at all in the presidential election if Nader wasn't on the ballot, Gore would still have more than won FL with the remaining 25% (and I'm ball-parking this).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. 20% of registered Dems voted for Bush in 2000
This was NOT the result of the Nader campaign

This was NOT because Bush is a brilliant statesman

This is for no other reason than that Gore ran a campaign in which the vast policy differences between himself and Bush were elided rather than emphasized. And in light of the vast Republican fraud in Florida, the big scary Nader crap is getting pretty damn old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. If just 1% of Nader's votes had gone to Gore
FL would never have happened like it did. Nader got 97K votes.

The Nader "crap" may be getting old and I guess Nader supporters are going to watch it get even older. Nader and those that voted for him will have to live with what they caused for the rest of their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Permanent denial is what a lot of people suffer from
* refused to concede the loss, Gore was afraid of starting a civil war, and Ralph could not believe telling the truth might hurt some people. Bill couldn't believe opening up his trouser fly could hurt and the PNAC thought the rest of world was as ignorant as they were.

Many people live in permanent denial here in this USA. I could go on but I am sure this will get deleted before the hours up because others are also living in a state of permanent denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nader is for Kucinich and so am I!
I agree with Nader about this one thing. Kucinich is the very best candidate ...but I doubt that he will be able to overcome the organization of Dean. If Dean would put Kucinich as his VP I would even overlook Dean's association with AIPAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Caller complains about Corvair thing -- 'how do you feel about putting...
...GM workers out of business over mildly unsafe Corvair, when the VW beetle was the least safe car on the road? why didn't you put VW employees out of work?"

A: Well, the Corvair put people out of lives. It was very unsafe (lists the multiple defects). And I wrote one chapter about the Corvair in a book. I wrote an entire book about why small cars like the VW Beetle were unsafe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Says all candidates except Dean have met with him.
Said it was implied that they were looking for endorsements. (Only one directly asked him for endorsement.)

Said he told them all that he's endorsing Kucinich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Good
Glad Dean didn't meet with this turkey, despite all the good things he did in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. might have been kerry
since they know each other i think kerry would have been comfortable asking him directly for it. but i can understand why he would support kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. he support DK, but still might run
hmmm...he confuses me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How convenient for Nader with Kucinich's odds of getting nod very low.
And don't tell me, Ralph Nader that the 97,488 votes you got in Florida did NOT make the difference. This, after you said you would NOT campaign in states where the race was too close to call.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. He has supported Kucinich from beginning.
There's nothing nefarious in it. Clearly he and Kucinich are on the same page, philosophically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I might also add that Nader said he like John Kerry, too.
He said this last fall, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. He also said he respected John Edwards's career as a lawyer.
He said that in 2002, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. yeah, talked about kerry and edwards at the same time
when is saw. you two might be referring to the same appearance. nader and kerry have known each other so it's no surprise he would like him. and edwards work as a trial lawyer is something that should be admired. and i of course expect him to support kucinich out of all the democratic candidates running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. Calls Dean a "work in progress"
Likes what he's doing with internet. But he was a moderate governor. Perhaps he has a dramatic conversion to being a liberal. But if he has, he should be talking more about corporate abuse. (I.e., he's a little too corproate-friendly.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Called Dean a run-of-the-mill Democrat
as Governor of Vermont who may have been "reinvigorated" for his presidential campaign.

He's a work-in-progress, according to Ralph, who, IMHO, will probably run again if Howard's liberal conversion doesn't hold up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. he "DOES" make some good points....we should listen to what he says
he has done good work for this country....I do not want him to run for president...his calling is as an advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. I like DK, in spite of Nader. Seems Ralphie is jockeying for power with HD
Is that VP spot still open in the HD kitchen cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Kucinich
If Dean were to pick Dennis for the VP, he'd lock in a loss for sure. It is almost mandatory that he ask Clark, then perhaps Edwards to be his VP, should Clark turn him down. This will silence the stupid defense debate, which is pretty moronic, as terrorism in America killed .00093% of the people in 2001, and we've been terrorist free in all the surrounding years. Heart attacks, diabetes, car wrecks, suicides, conventional murders, accidents each and every year, and a number of other things, like mad-cow disease, kill more people. We need to bring the fear in perspective.

I think viewing Lieberman--who had the name recognition going into the primary--and his steady decline of numbers from about 20% to 6% now, could point to a large part of Gore's difficulty. Clearly, a lot of folks were unhappy with Gore's choice as running mate, and are just as mad at Lieberman now.

Lieberman clearly shows by his campaign tactics that he values his candidacy over the democratic party, which I've maintained all along he is barely a member of, and I wish he'd go ahead and move to the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. Slamming Howard for saying he won't cut defense
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 09:50 AM by BeyondGeography
Of course, Howard can't do this because he's already perceived as being weak on defense and he'd be picked apart by the Pubs in the GE over this.

Nader is correct in saying that some of the money for social spending will have to come from defense. Called the $9 bn. we're spending on missile defense a waste of money, which is correct.

By the way, Clark has promised a top-down review of defense spending. When he cuts defense, he'll have the credibility to pull it off. Not so with Howard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. Nader
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. sure sounding like he wants to run at the end of the segment n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. it's a damn shame he can't be trusted. it would be great to two team bush
but he proved he can't be trusted to stay out of the contested states.

damn shame...he always got press and we could have used him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. it was funny watching him insult that Regressive at the end(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. He did slap him down pretty hard, didn't he ?
But he was deserving...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. yeah it was great
i was shocked there weren't more Regressives calling him, they usually hound Nader anytime he is on a call in show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC