5. Everyone's going to say "yes". But, to be honest, I had to look up to see what it had become.
It's not as simple just as "harbor someone who threatens us and we can attack you". It's become quite complicated (or so I gather from the Sunday shows over the years). It always just seemed to be an ad hoc justification for their activities.
So yeah, I'm not really sure that I completely understand it.
9. Yes. It's a constantly-changing self-serving proclamation by * that says "we can do anything and
nobody can do a f*cking thing about it."
It's not just one thing. First it was the justification for invading Afghanistan for harboring the Taliban. Then the phrase was used to justify invading Iraq "pre-emptively" to depose Saddam, a perceived future threat. It was also used to describe supporting "Democracy" world-wide, and ultimately used as our justification for acting unilaterally to do basically anything we want in our own self-interest.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.